Cargando…

Formaldehyde Reduction in an Operating Room Setting: Comparison of a Catalytic Surgical Vacuum Device With a Traditional Smoke Evacuator

Introduction Electrosurgery exposes healthcare workers to volatile organic compounds (VOCs) including formaldehyde. Adopting electrosurgical devices that catalytically transform formaldehyde to benign substances has the potential to improve safety in surgical settings. Materials and methods We compa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carroll, Gregory T, Kirschman, David L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10253242/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37303407
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.38831
_version_ 1785056360217444352
author Carroll, Gregory T
Kirschman, David L
author_facet Carroll, Gregory T
Kirschman, David L
author_sort Carroll, Gregory T
collection PubMed
description Introduction Electrosurgery exposes healthcare workers to volatile organic compounds (VOCs) including formaldehyde. Adopting electrosurgical devices that catalytically transform formaldehyde to benign substances has the potential to improve safety in surgical settings. Materials and methods We compared the efficiency of formaldehyde removal of two medical devices. The first was a novel surgical vacuum (SV) device containing ultra-low particulate air (ULPA) filtration, activated carbon and catalytic transition metal oxide. The second was a commonly utilized handpiece evacuator (HE) that contained only mechanical filtration and activated carbon granules. Both devices were exposed to formalin vapor. Results The time weighted average (TWA), median and peak concentrations of detected formaldehyde at the outflow of the SV unit were 90% lower than the corresponding values detected at the outflow of the HE device (p = 0.0034). When catalytic material was added to the HE device, the detected formaldehyde concentration at the outflow was reduced by 55% (p = 2.9 x 10(-15)). Conclusions The catalytic SV device has the potential to considerably reduce formaldehyde levels in operating room (OR) environments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10253242
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102532422023-06-10 Formaldehyde Reduction in an Operating Room Setting: Comparison of a Catalytic Surgical Vacuum Device With a Traditional Smoke Evacuator Carroll, Gregory T Kirschman, David L Cureus Environmental Health Introduction Electrosurgery exposes healthcare workers to volatile organic compounds (VOCs) including formaldehyde. Adopting electrosurgical devices that catalytically transform formaldehyde to benign substances has the potential to improve safety in surgical settings. Materials and methods We compared the efficiency of formaldehyde removal of two medical devices. The first was a novel surgical vacuum (SV) device containing ultra-low particulate air (ULPA) filtration, activated carbon and catalytic transition metal oxide. The second was a commonly utilized handpiece evacuator (HE) that contained only mechanical filtration and activated carbon granules. Both devices were exposed to formalin vapor. Results The time weighted average (TWA), median and peak concentrations of detected formaldehyde at the outflow of the SV unit were 90% lower than the corresponding values detected at the outflow of the HE device (p = 0.0034). When catalytic material was added to the HE device, the detected formaldehyde concentration at the outflow was reduced by 55% (p = 2.9 x 10(-15)). Conclusions The catalytic SV device has the potential to considerably reduce formaldehyde levels in operating room (OR) environments. Cureus 2023-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10253242/ /pubmed/37303407 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.38831 Text en Copyright © 2023, Carroll et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Environmental Health
Carroll, Gregory T
Kirschman, David L
Formaldehyde Reduction in an Operating Room Setting: Comparison of a Catalytic Surgical Vacuum Device With a Traditional Smoke Evacuator
title Formaldehyde Reduction in an Operating Room Setting: Comparison of a Catalytic Surgical Vacuum Device With a Traditional Smoke Evacuator
title_full Formaldehyde Reduction in an Operating Room Setting: Comparison of a Catalytic Surgical Vacuum Device With a Traditional Smoke Evacuator
title_fullStr Formaldehyde Reduction in an Operating Room Setting: Comparison of a Catalytic Surgical Vacuum Device With a Traditional Smoke Evacuator
title_full_unstemmed Formaldehyde Reduction in an Operating Room Setting: Comparison of a Catalytic Surgical Vacuum Device With a Traditional Smoke Evacuator
title_short Formaldehyde Reduction in an Operating Room Setting: Comparison of a Catalytic Surgical Vacuum Device With a Traditional Smoke Evacuator
title_sort formaldehyde reduction in an operating room setting: comparison of a catalytic surgical vacuum device with a traditional smoke evacuator
topic Environmental Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10253242/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37303407
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.38831
work_keys_str_mv AT carrollgregoryt formaldehydereductioninanoperatingroomsettingcomparisonofacatalyticsurgicalvacuumdevicewithatraditionalsmokeevacuator
AT kirschmandavidl formaldehydereductioninanoperatingroomsettingcomparisonofacatalyticsurgicalvacuumdevicewithatraditionalsmokeevacuator