Cargando…
Formaldehyde Reduction in an Operating Room Setting: Comparison of a Catalytic Surgical Vacuum Device With a Traditional Smoke Evacuator
Introduction Electrosurgery exposes healthcare workers to volatile organic compounds (VOCs) including formaldehyde. Adopting electrosurgical devices that catalytically transform formaldehyde to benign substances has the potential to improve safety in surgical settings. Materials and methods We compa...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10253242/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37303407 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.38831 |
_version_ | 1785056360217444352 |
---|---|
author | Carroll, Gregory T Kirschman, David L |
author_facet | Carroll, Gregory T Kirschman, David L |
author_sort | Carroll, Gregory T |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction Electrosurgery exposes healthcare workers to volatile organic compounds (VOCs) including formaldehyde. Adopting electrosurgical devices that catalytically transform formaldehyde to benign substances has the potential to improve safety in surgical settings. Materials and methods We compared the efficiency of formaldehyde removal of two medical devices. The first was a novel surgical vacuum (SV) device containing ultra-low particulate air (ULPA) filtration, activated carbon and catalytic transition metal oxide. The second was a commonly utilized handpiece evacuator (HE) that contained only mechanical filtration and activated carbon granules. Both devices were exposed to formalin vapor. Results The time weighted average (TWA), median and peak concentrations of detected formaldehyde at the outflow of the SV unit were 90% lower than the corresponding values detected at the outflow of the HE device (p = 0.0034). When catalytic material was added to the HE device, the detected formaldehyde concentration at the outflow was reduced by 55% (p = 2.9 x 10(-15)). Conclusions The catalytic SV device has the potential to considerably reduce formaldehyde levels in operating room (OR) environments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10253242 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102532422023-06-10 Formaldehyde Reduction in an Operating Room Setting: Comparison of a Catalytic Surgical Vacuum Device With a Traditional Smoke Evacuator Carroll, Gregory T Kirschman, David L Cureus Environmental Health Introduction Electrosurgery exposes healthcare workers to volatile organic compounds (VOCs) including formaldehyde. Adopting electrosurgical devices that catalytically transform formaldehyde to benign substances has the potential to improve safety in surgical settings. Materials and methods We compared the efficiency of formaldehyde removal of two medical devices. The first was a novel surgical vacuum (SV) device containing ultra-low particulate air (ULPA) filtration, activated carbon and catalytic transition metal oxide. The second was a commonly utilized handpiece evacuator (HE) that contained only mechanical filtration and activated carbon granules. Both devices were exposed to formalin vapor. Results The time weighted average (TWA), median and peak concentrations of detected formaldehyde at the outflow of the SV unit were 90% lower than the corresponding values detected at the outflow of the HE device (p = 0.0034). When catalytic material was added to the HE device, the detected formaldehyde concentration at the outflow was reduced by 55% (p = 2.9 x 10(-15)). Conclusions The catalytic SV device has the potential to considerably reduce formaldehyde levels in operating room (OR) environments. Cureus 2023-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10253242/ /pubmed/37303407 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.38831 Text en Copyright © 2023, Carroll et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Environmental Health Carroll, Gregory T Kirschman, David L Formaldehyde Reduction in an Operating Room Setting: Comparison of a Catalytic Surgical Vacuum Device With a Traditional Smoke Evacuator |
title | Formaldehyde Reduction in an Operating Room Setting: Comparison of a Catalytic Surgical Vacuum Device With a Traditional Smoke Evacuator |
title_full | Formaldehyde Reduction in an Operating Room Setting: Comparison of a Catalytic Surgical Vacuum Device With a Traditional Smoke Evacuator |
title_fullStr | Formaldehyde Reduction in an Operating Room Setting: Comparison of a Catalytic Surgical Vacuum Device With a Traditional Smoke Evacuator |
title_full_unstemmed | Formaldehyde Reduction in an Operating Room Setting: Comparison of a Catalytic Surgical Vacuum Device With a Traditional Smoke Evacuator |
title_short | Formaldehyde Reduction in an Operating Room Setting: Comparison of a Catalytic Surgical Vacuum Device With a Traditional Smoke Evacuator |
title_sort | formaldehyde reduction in an operating room setting: comparison of a catalytic surgical vacuum device with a traditional smoke evacuator |
topic | Environmental Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10253242/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37303407 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.38831 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT carrollgregoryt formaldehydereductioninanoperatingroomsettingcomparisonofacatalyticsurgicalvacuumdevicewithatraditionalsmokeevacuator AT kirschmandavidl formaldehydereductioninanoperatingroomsettingcomparisonofacatalyticsurgicalvacuumdevicewithatraditionalsmokeevacuator |