Cargando…

Nonintubated versus Intubated Lung Volume Reduction Surgery in Patients with End-Stage Lung Emphysema and Hypercapnia

Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) represents an important treatment option in carefully selected patients with end-stage lung emphysema. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of nonintubated LVRS compared to intubated LVRS in patients with preoperative hypercapnia and lung e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Akil, Ali, Rehers, Stephanie, Ziegeler, Stephan, Ernst, Erik, Haselmann, Jan, Dickgreber, Nicolas Johannes, Fischer, Stefan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10253275/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37297944
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12113750
_version_ 1785056367011168256
author Akil, Ali
Rehers, Stephanie
Ziegeler, Stephan
Ernst, Erik
Haselmann, Jan
Dickgreber, Nicolas Johannes
Fischer, Stefan
author_facet Akil, Ali
Rehers, Stephanie
Ziegeler, Stephan
Ernst, Erik
Haselmann, Jan
Dickgreber, Nicolas Johannes
Fischer, Stefan
author_sort Akil, Ali
collection PubMed
description Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) represents an important treatment option in carefully selected patients with end-stage lung emphysema. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of nonintubated LVRS compared to intubated LVRS in patients with preoperative hypercapnia and lung emphysema. Between April 2019 and February 2021, n = 92 patients with end-stage lung emphysema and preoperative hypercapnia undergoing unilateral video-assisted thoracoscopic LVRS (VATS-LVRS) performed in epidural anesthesia and mild sedation (nonintubated, group 1) or conventional general anesthesia (intubated, control, group 2) were prospectively enrolled in this study. Data were retrospectively analyzed. In all patients, low-flow veno-venous extracorporeal lung support (low-flow VV ECLS) was applied as a bridge through LVRS. Ninety-day mortality was considered as the primary outcome. Secondary endpoints included: chest tube duration, hospital stay, intubation and conversion to general anesthesia. Intergroup analysis showed no significant difference between the baseline data and patients’ demographics. N = 36 patients underwent nonintubated surgery. VATS-LVRS under general anesthesia was performed in n = 56 patients. The mean duration of postoperative VV ECLS support was 3 ± 1 day in group 1 compared to 4 ± 1 in group 2. The 90-day mortality rate was 3% in group 1 compared to 7% in group 2. In group 1, all chest tubes were removed 5 ± 1 day (range 4–32 days) and 8 ± 1 day (range 4–44 days) in the control group after the surgery (p < 0.02). Prolonged chest tube therapy (>8 days) was observed in n = 3 patients in group 1 and n = 11 patients in the control group. The mean ICU stay was 4 ± 1 days in group 1 compared to 8 ± 2 days in the control group (p = 0.04). The mean hospital stay was significantly shorter in the nonintubated group 1 (6 ± 2 days vs. 10 ± 4 days, p = 0.01). Conversion to general anesthesia was necessary in one patient due to severe pleural adhesions. Nonintubated VATS-LVRS in patients with end-stage lung emphysema and hypercapnia is effective and well tolerated. Compared to general anesthesia, a reduction in mortality, chest tube duration, ICU and hospital stay and lower rate of prolonged air leak was observed. VV ECLS increases intraoperative safety and mitigates postoperative complications in such “high-risk” patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10253275
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102532752023-06-10 Nonintubated versus Intubated Lung Volume Reduction Surgery in Patients with End-Stage Lung Emphysema and Hypercapnia Akil, Ali Rehers, Stephanie Ziegeler, Stephan Ernst, Erik Haselmann, Jan Dickgreber, Nicolas Johannes Fischer, Stefan J Clin Med Article Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) represents an important treatment option in carefully selected patients with end-stage lung emphysema. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of nonintubated LVRS compared to intubated LVRS in patients with preoperative hypercapnia and lung emphysema. Between April 2019 and February 2021, n = 92 patients with end-stage lung emphysema and preoperative hypercapnia undergoing unilateral video-assisted thoracoscopic LVRS (VATS-LVRS) performed in epidural anesthesia and mild sedation (nonintubated, group 1) or conventional general anesthesia (intubated, control, group 2) were prospectively enrolled in this study. Data were retrospectively analyzed. In all patients, low-flow veno-venous extracorporeal lung support (low-flow VV ECLS) was applied as a bridge through LVRS. Ninety-day mortality was considered as the primary outcome. Secondary endpoints included: chest tube duration, hospital stay, intubation and conversion to general anesthesia. Intergroup analysis showed no significant difference between the baseline data and patients’ demographics. N = 36 patients underwent nonintubated surgery. VATS-LVRS under general anesthesia was performed in n = 56 patients. The mean duration of postoperative VV ECLS support was 3 ± 1 day in group 1 compared to 4 ± 1 in group 2. The 90-day mortality rate was 3% in group 1 compared to 7% in group 2. In group 1, all chest tubes were removed 5 ± 1 day (range 4–32 days) and 8 ± 1 day (range 4–44 days) in the control group after the surgery (p < 0.02). Prolonged chest tube therapy (>8 days) was observed in n = 3 patients in group 1 and n = 11 patients in the control group. The mean ICU stay was 4 ± 1 days in group 1 compared to 8 ± 2 days in the control group (p = 0.04). The mean hospital stay was significantly shorter in the nonintubated group 1 (6 ± 2 days vs. 10 ± 4 days, p = 0.01). Conversion to general anesthesia was necessary in one patient due to severe pleural adhesions. Nonintubated VATS-LVRS in patients with end-stage lung emphysema and hypercapnia is effective and well tolerated. Compared to general anesthesia, a reduction in mortality, chest tube duration, ICU and hospital stay and lower rate of prolonged air leak was observed. VV ECLS increases intraoperative safety and mitigates postoperative complications in such “high-risk” patients. MDPI 2023-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10253275/ /pubmed/37297944 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12113750 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Akil, Ali
Rehers, Stephanie
Ziegeler, Stephan
Ernst, Erik
Haselmann, Jan
Dickgreber, Nicolas Johannes
Fischer, Stefan
Nonintubated versus Intubated Lung Volume Reduction Surgery in Patients with End-Stage Lung Emphysema and Hypercapnia
title Nonintubated versus Intubated Lung Volume Reduction Surgery in Patients with End-Stage Lung Emphysema and Hypercapnia
title_full Nonintubated versus Intubated Lung Volume Reduction Surgery in Patients with End-Stage Lung Emphysema and Hypercapnia
title_fullStr Nonintubated versus Intubated Lung Volume Reduction Surgery in Patients with End-Stage Lung Emphysema and Hypercapnia
title_full_unstemmed Nonintubated versus Intubated Lung Volume Reduction Surgery in Patients with End-Stage Lung Emphysema and Hypercapnia
title_short Nonintubated versus Intubated Lung Volume Reduction Surgery in Patients with End-Stage Lung Emphysema and Hypercapnia
title_sort nonintubated versus intubated lung volume reduction surgery in patients with end-stage lung emphysema and hypercapnia
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10253275/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37297944
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12113750
work_keys_str_mv AT akilali nonintubatedversusintubatedlungvolumereductionsurgeryinpatientswithendstagelungemphysemaandhypercapnia
AT rehersstephanie nonintubatedversusintubatedlungvolumereductionsurgeryinpatientswithendstagelungemphysemaandhypercapnia
AT ziegelerstephan nonintubatedversusintubatedlungvolumereductionsurgeryinpatientswithendstagelungemphysemaandhypercapnia
AT ernsterik nonintubatedversusintubatedlungvolumereductionsurgeryinpatientswithendstagelungemphysemaandhypercapnia
AT haselmannjan nonintubatedversusintubatedlungvolumereductionsurgeryinpatientswithendstagelungemphysemaandhypercapnia
AT dickgrebernicolasjohannes nonintubatedversusintubatedlungvolumereductionsurgeryinpatientswithendstagelungemphysemaandhypercapnia
AT fischerstefan nonintubatedversusintubatedlungvolumereductionsurgeryinpatientswithendstagelungemphysemaandhypercapnia