Cargando…
Comparison of Osteoconductive Ability of Two Types of Cholesterol-Bearing Pullulan (CHP) Nanogel-Hydrogels Impregnated with BMP-2 and RANKL-Binding Peptide: Bone Histomorphometric Study in a Murine Calvarial Defect Model
The receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL)-binding peptide is known to accelerate bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-2-induced bone formation. Cholesterol-bearing pullulan (CHP)-OA nanogel-crosslinked PEG gel (CHP-OA nanogel-hydrogel) was shown to release the RANKL-binding peptide sustainably; how...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10253458/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37298702 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms24119751 |
_version_ | 1785056410759856128 |
---|---|
author | Xie, Cangyou Rashed, Fatma Sasaki, Yosuke Khan, Masud Qi, Jia Kubo, Yuri Matsumoto, Yoshiro Sawada, Shinichi Sasaki, Yoshihiro Ono, Takashi Ikeda, Tohru Akiyoshi, Kazunari Aoki, Kazuhiro |
author_facet | Xie, Cangyou Rashed, Fatma Sasaki, Yosuke Khan, Masud Qi, Jia Kubo, Yuri Matsumoto, Yoshiro Sawada, Shinichi Sasaki, Yoshihiro Ono, Takashi Ikeda, Tohru Akiyoshi, Kazunari Aoki, Kazuhiro |
author_sort | Xie, Cangyou |
collection | PubMed |
description | The receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL)-binding peptide is known to accelerate bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-2-induced bone formation. Cholesterol-bearing pullulan (CHP)-OA nanogel-crosslinked PEG gel (CHP-OA nanogel-hydrogel) was shown to release the RANKL-binding peptide sustainably; however, an appropriate scaffold for peptide-accelerated bone formation is not determined yet. This study compares the osteoconductivity of CHP-OA hydrogel and another CHP nanogel, CHP-A nanogel-crosslinked PEG gel (CHP-A nanogel–hydrogel), in the bone formation induced by BMP-2 and the peptide. A calvarial defect model was performed in 5-week-old male mice, and scaffolds were placed in the defect. In vivo μCT was performed every week. Radiological and histological analyses after 4 weeks of scaffold placement revealed that the calcified bone area and the bone formation activity at the defect site in the CHP-OA hydrogel were significantly lower than those in the CHP-A hydrogel when the scaffolds were impregnated with both BMP-2 and the RANKL-binding peptide. The amount of induced bone was similar in both CHP-A and CHP-OA hydrogels when impregnated with BMP-2 alone. In conclusion, CHP-A hydrogel could be an appropriate scaffold compared to the CHP-OA hydrogel when the local bone formation was induced by the combination of RANKL-binding peptide and BMP-2, but not by BMP-2 alone. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10253458 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102534582023-06-10 Comparison of Osteoconductive Ability of Two Types of Cholesterol-Bearing Pullulan (CHP) Nanogel-Hydrogels Impregnated with BMP-2 and RANKL-Binding Peptide: Bone Histomorphometric Study in a Murine Calvarial Defect Model Xie, Cangyou Rashed, Fatma Sasaki, Yosuke Khan, Masud Qi, Jia Kubo, Yuri Matsumoto, Yoshiro Sawada, Shinichi Sasaki, Yoshihiro Ono, Takashi Ikeda, Tohru Akiyoshi, Kazunari Aoki, Kazuhiro Int J Mol Sci Article The receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL)-binding peptide is known to accelerate bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-2-induced bone formation. Cholesterol-bearing pullulan (CHP)-OA nanogel-crosslinked PEG gel (CHP-OA nanogel-hydrogel) was shown to release the RANKL-binding peptide sustainably; however, an appropriate scaffold for peptide-accelerated bone formation is not determined yet. This study compares the osteoconductivity of CHP-OA hydrogel and another CHP nanogel, CHP-A nanogel-crosslinked PEG gel (CHP-A nanogel–hydrogel), in the bone formation induced by BMP-2 and the peptide. A calvarial defect model was performed in 5-week-old male mice, and scaffolds were placed in the defect. In vivo μCT was performed every week. Radiological and histological analyses after 4 weeks of scaffold placement revealed that the calcified bone area and the bone formation activity at the defect site in the CHP-OA hydrogel were significantly lower than those in the CHP-A hydrogel when the scaffolds were impregnated with both BMP-2 and the RANKL-binding peptide. The amount of induced bone was similar in both CHP-A and CHP-OA hydrogels when impregnated with BMP-2 alone. In conclusion, CHP-A hydrogel could be an appropriate scaffold compared to the CHP-OA hydrogel when the local bone formation was induced by the combination of RANKL-binding peptide and BMP-2, but not by BMP-2 alone. MDPI 2023-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10253458/ /pubmed/37298702 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms24119751 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Xie, Cangyou Rashed, Fatma Sasaki, Yosuke Khan, Masud Qi, Jia Kubo, Yuri Matsumoto, Yoshiro Sawada, Shinichi Sasaki, Yoshihiro Ono, Takashi Ikeda, Tohru Akiyoshi, Kazunari Aoki, Kazuhiro Comparison of Osteoconductive Ability of Two Types of Cholesterol-Bearing Pullulan (CHP) Nanogel-Hydrogels Impregnated with BMP-2 and RANKL-Binding Peptide: Bone Histomorphometric Study in a Murine Calvarial Defect Model |
title | Comparison of Osteoconductive Ability of Two Types of Cholesterol-Bearing Pullulan (CHP) Nanogel-Hydrogels Impregnated with BMP-2 and RANKL-Binding Peptide: Bone Histomorphometric Study in a Murine Calvarial Defect Model |
title_full | Comparison of Osteoconductive Ability of Two Types of Cholesterol-Bearing Pullulan (CHP) Nanogel-Hydrogels Impregnated with BMP-2 and RANKL-Binding Peptide: Bone Histomorphometric Study in a Murine Calvarial Defect Model |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Osteoconductive Ability of Two Types of Cholesterol-Bearing Pullulan (CHP) Nanogel-Hydrogels Impregnated with BMP-2 and RANKL-Binding Peptide: Bone Histomorphometric Study in a Murine Calvarial Defect Model |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Osteoconductive Ability of Two Types of Cholesterol-Bearing Pullulan (CHP) Nanogel-Hydrogels Impregnated with BMP-2 and RANKL-Binding Peptide: Bone Histomorphometric Study in a Murine Calvarial Defect Model |
title_short | Comparison of Osteoconductive Ability of Two Types of Cholesterol-Bearing Pullulan (CHP) Nanogel-Hydrogels Impregnated with BMP-2 and RANKL-Binding Peptide: Bone Histomorphometric Study in a Murine Calvarial Defect Model |
title_sort | comparison of osteoconductive ability of two types of cholesterol-bearing pullulan (chp) nanogel-hydrogels impregnated with bmp-2 and rankl-binding peptide: bone histomorphometric study in a murine calvarial defect model |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10253458/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37298702 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms24119751 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xiecangyou comparisonofosteoconductiveabilityoftwotypesofcholesterolbearingpullulanchpnanogelhydrogelsimpregnatedwithbmp2andranklbindingpeptidebonehistomorphometricstudyinamurinecalvarialdefectmodel AT rashedfatma comparisonofosteoconductiveabilityoftwotypesofcholesterolbearingpullulanchpnanogelhydrogelsimpregnatedwithbmp2andranklbindingpeptidebonehistomorphometricstudyinamurinecalvarialdefectmodel AT sasakiyosuke comparisonofosteoconductiveabilityoftwotypesofcholesterolbearingpullulanchpnanogelhydrogelsimpregnatedwithbmp2andranklbindingpeptidebonehistomorphometricstudyinamurinecalvarialdefectmodel AT khanmasud comparisonofosteoconductiveabilityoftwotypesofcholesterolbearingpullulanchpnanogelhydrogelsimpregnatedwithbmp2andranklbindingpeptidebonehistomorphometricstudyinamurinecalvarialdefectmodel AT qijia comparisonofosteoconductiveabilityoftwotypesofcholesterolbearingpullulanchpnanogelhydrogelsimpregnatedwithbmp2andranklbindingpeptidebonehistomorphometricstudyinamurinecalvarialdefectmodel AT kuboyuri comparisonofosteoconductiveabilityoftwotypesofcholesterolbearingpullulanchpnanogelhydrogelsimpregnatedwithbmp2andranklbindingpeptidebonehistomorphometricstudyinamurinecalvarialdefectmodel AT matsumotoyoshiro comparisonofosteoconductiveabilityoftwotypesofcholesterolbearingpullulanchpnanogelhydrogelsimpregnatedwithbmp2andranklbindingpeptidebonehistomorphometricstudyinamurinecalvarialdefectmodel AT sawadashinichi comparisonofosteoconductiveabilityoftwotypesofcholesterolbearingpullulanchpnanogelhydrogelsimpregnatedwithbmp2andranklbindingpeptidebonehistomorphometricstudyinamurinecalvarialdefectmodel AT sasakiyoshihiro comparisonofosteoconductiveabilityoftwotypesofcholesterolbearingpullulanchpnanogelhydrogelsimpregnatedwithbmp2andranklbindingpeptidebonehistomorphometricstudyinamurinecalvarialdefectmodel AT onotakashi comparisonofosteoconductiveabilityoftwotypesofcholesterolbearingpullulanchpnanogelhydrogelsimpregnatedwithbmp2andranklbindingpeptidebonehistomorphometricstudyinamurinecalvarialdefectmodel AT ikedatohru comparisonofosteoconductiveabilityoftwotypesofcholesterolbearingpullulanchpnanogelhydrogelsimpregnatedwithbmp2andranklbindingpeptidebonehistomorphometricstudyinamurinecalvarialdefectmodel AT akiyoshikazunari comparisonofosteoconductiveabilityoftwotypesofcholesterolbearingpullulanchpnanogelhydrogelsimpregnatedwithbmp2andranklbindingpeptidebonehistomorphometricstudyinamurinecalvarialdefectmodel AT aokikazuhiro comparisonofosteoconductiveabilityoftwotypesofcholesterolbearingpullulanchpnanogelhydrogelsimpregnatedwithbmp2andranklbindingpeptidebonehistomorphometricstudyinamurinecalvarialdefectmodel |