Cargando…
Minimally Invasive Staging of Early-Stage Epithelial Ovarian Cancer versus Open Surgery in Terms of Feasibility and Safety: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Epithelial ovarian cancer is women’s fourth most common oncological cause of death. One of the main prognostic factors in ovarian cancer is the tumor stage. For instance, surgical staging of the disease is focal when choosing the best therapeutic option for each case. Although open surgery is the pr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10253482/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37298026 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12113831 |
_version_ | 1785056416408535040 |
---|---|
author | Ronsini, Carlo Pasanisi, Francesca Molitierno, Rossella Iavarone, Irene Vastarella, Maria Giovanna De Franciscis, Pasquale Conte, Carmine |
author_facet | Ronsini, Carlo Pasanisi, Francesca Molitierno, Rossella Iavarone, Irene Vastarella, Maria Giovanna De Franciscis, Pasquale Conte, Carmine |
author_sort | Ronsini, Carlo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Epithelial ovarian cancer is women’s fourth most common oncological cause of death. One of the main prognostic factors in ovarian cancer is the tumor stage. For instance, surgical staging of the disease is focal when choosing the best therapeutic option for each case. Although open surgery is the prevalent approach for staging and treating ovarian cancer, the use of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has found recent application in staging or restaging cases of early disease. Our work compares oncological outcomes after MIS staging for FIGO I epithelial ovarian cancer with the laparotomic approach. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement recommendations, we systematically searched the Pub Med and Scopus databases in February 2023. No temporal nor geographical limitation was made. We included the articles containing data about Disease-Free Survival (DFS) and Overall Survival (OS), Recurrence Rates (RR), and Upstaging Rates (UpR). We used comparative studies for the meta-analysis. After the database search and article selection, 19 works matched the inclusion criteria for the systematic review. Eleven of these were comparative studies between MIS and Open Surgical Staging (OSS) approaches for ovarian cancer staging and were included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis did not show a statistically significant difference between the MIS and the OSS group concerning DFS, OS, and RR. Only Upstaging Rate ≥ FIGO Stage II was statistically significative higher in the OSS group. Likewise, MIS is confirmed to be an approach with a lower profile of surgical complications. In conclusion, our study did not show one approach to be safer than the other. However, the lack of dedicated studies limits the evidence of our study. For instance, we recommend adequately selecting the specimen, minimizing the risk of spillage, and optimizing surgical staging. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10253482 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102534822023-06-10 Minimally Invasive Staging of Early-Stage Epithelial Ovarian Cancer versus Open Surgery in Terms of Feasibility and Safety: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Ronsini, Carlo Pasanisi, Francesca Molitierno, Rossella Iavarone, Irene Vastarella, Maria Giovanna De Franciscis, Pasquale Conte, Carmine J Clin Med Systematic Review Epithelial ovarian cancer is women’s fourth most common oncological cause of death. One of the main prognostic factors in ovarian cancer is the tumor stage. For instance, surgical staging of the disease is focal when choosing the best therapeutic option for each case. Although open surgery is the prevalent approach for staging and treating ovarian cancer, the use of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has found recent application in staging or restaging cases of early disease. Our work compares oncological outcomes after MIS staging for FIGO I epithelial ovarian cancer with the laparotomic approach. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement recommendations, we systematically searched the Pub Med and Scopus databases in February 2023. No temporal nor geographical limitation was made. We included the articles containing data about Disease-Free Survival (DFS) and Overall Survival (OS), Recurrence Rates (RR), and Upstaging Rates (UpR). We used comparative studies for the meta-analysis. After the database search and article selection, 19 works matched the inclusion criteria for the systematic review. Eleven of these were comparative studies between MIS and Open Surgical Staging (OSS) approaches for ovarian cancer staging and were included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis did not show a statistically significant difference between the MIS and the OSS group concerning DFS, OS, and RR. Only Upstaging Rate ≥ FIGO Stage II was statistically significative higher in the OSS group. Likewise, MIS is confirmed to be an approach with a lower profile of surgical complications. In conclusion, our study did not show one approach to be safer than the other. However, the lack of dedicated studies limits the evidence of our study. For instance, we recommend adequately selecting the specimen, minimizing the risk of spillage, and optimizing surgical staging. MDPI 2023-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10253482/ /pubmed/37298026 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12113831 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Ronsini, Carlo Pasanisi, Francesca Molitierno, Rossella Iavarone, Irene Vastarella, Maria Giovanna De Franciscis, Pasquale Conte, Carmine Minimally Invasive Staging of Early-Stage Epithelial Ovarian Cancer versus Open Surgery in Terms of Feasibility and Safety: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Minimally Invasive Staging of Early-Stage Epithelial Ovarian Cancer versus Open Surgery in Terms of Feasibility and Safety: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Minimally Invasive Staging of Early-Stage Epithelial Ovarian Cancer versus Open Surgery in Terms of Feasibility and Safety: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Minimally Invasive Staging of Early-Stage Epithelial Ovarian Cancer versus Open Surgery in Terms of Feasibility and Safety: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Minimally Invasive Staging of Early-Stage Epithelial Ovarian Cancer versus Open Surgery in Terms of Feasibility and Safety: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Minimally Invasive Staging of Early-Stage Epithelial Ovarian Cancer versus Open Surgery in Terms of Feasibility and Safety: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | minimally invasive staging of early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer versus open surgery in terms of feasibility and safety: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10253482/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37298026 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12113831 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ronsinicarlo minimallyinvasivestagingofearlystageepithelialovariancancerversusopensurgeryintermsoffeasibilityandsafetyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT pasanisifrancesca minimallyinvasivestagingofearlystageepithelialovariancancerversusopensurgeryintermsoffeasibilityandsafetyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT molitiernorossella minimallyinvasivestagingofearlystageepithelialovariancancerversusopensurgeryintermsoffeasibilityandsafetyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT iavaroneirene minimallyinvasivestagingofearlystageepithelialovariancancerversusopensurgeryintermsoffeasibilityandsafetyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT vastarellamariagiovanna minimallyinvasivestagingofearlystageepithelialovariancancerversusopensurgeryintermsoffeasibilityandsafetyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT defranciscispasquale minimallyinvasivestagingofearlystageepithelialovariancancerversusopensurgeryintermsoffeasibilityandsafetyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT contecarmine minimallyinvasivestagingofearlystageepithelialovariancancerversusopensurgeryintermsoffeasibilityandsafetyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |