Cargando…

A Comparative Study of CCM and CCS Membrane Electrode Assemblies for High-Temperature Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells with a CsH(5)(PO(4))(2)-Doped Polybenzimidazole Membrane

Membrane electrode assemblies (MEAs) are critical components in influencing the electrochemical performance of high-temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cells (HT-PEMFCs). MEA manufacturing processes are mainly divided into the catalyst-coated membrane (CCM) and the catalyst-coated substrate (C...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Yizhe, Fu, Zhiyong, Li, Yifan, Zhang, Guichen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10253925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37297059
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16113925
_version_ 1785056522350362624
author Li, Yizhe
Fu, Zhiyong
Li, Yifan
Zhang, Guichen
author_facet Li, Yizhe
Fu, Zhiyong
Li, Yifan
Zhang, Guichen
author_sort Li, Yizhe
collection PubMed
description Membrane electrode assemblies (MEAs) are critical components in influencing the electrochemical performance of high-temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cells (HT-PEMFCs). MEA manufacturing processes are mainly divided into the catalyst-coated membrane (CCM) and the catalyst-coated substrate (CCS) methods. For conventional HT-PEMFCs based on phosphoric acid-doped polybenzimidazole (PBI) membranes, the wetting surface and extreme swelling of the PA-doped PBI membranes make the CCM method difficult to apply to the fabrication of MEAs. In this study, by taking advantage of the dry surface and low swelling of a CsH(5)(PO(4))(2)-doped PBI membrane, an MEA fabricated by the CCM method was compared with an MEA made by the CCS method. Under each temperature condition, the peak power density of the CCM-MEA was higher than that of the CCS-MEA. Furthermore, under humidified gas conditions, an enhancement in the peak power densities was observed for both MEAs, which was attributed to the increase in the conductivity of the electrolyte membrane. The CCM-MEA exhibited a peak power density of 647 mW cm(−2) at 200 °C, which was ~16% higher than that of the CCS-MEA. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy results showed that the CCM-MEA had lower ohmic resistance, which implied that it had better contact between the membrane and catalyst layer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10253925
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102539252023-06-10 A Comparative Study of CCM and CCS Membrane Electrode Assemblies for High-Temperature Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells with a CsH(5)(PO(4))(2)-Doped Polybenzimidazole Membrane Li, Yizhe Fu, Zhiyong Li, Yifan Zhang, Guichen Materials (Basel) Article Membrane electrode assemblies (MEAs) are critical components in influencing the electrochemical performance of high-temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cells (HT-PEMFCs). MEA manufacturing processes are mainly divided into the catalyst-coated membrane (CCM) and the catalyst-coated substrate (CCS) methods. For conventional HT-PEMFCs based on phosphoric acid-doped polybenzimidazole (PBI) membranes, the wetting surface and extreme swelling of the PA-doped PBI membranes make the CCM method difficult to apply to the fabrication of MEAs. In this study, by taking advantage of the dry surface and low swelling of a CsH(5)(PO(4))(2)-doped PBI membrane, an MEA fabricated by the CCM method was compared with an MEA made by the CCS method. Under each temperature condition, the peak power density of the CCM-MEA was higher than that of the CCS-MEA. Furthermore, under humidified gas conditions, an enhancement in the peak power densities was observed for both MEAs, which was attributed to the increase in the conductivity of the electrolyte membrane. The CCM-MEA exhibited a peak power density of 647 mW cm(−2) at 200 °C, which was ~16% higher than that of the CCS-MEA. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy results showed that the CCM-MEA had lower ohmic resistance, which implied that it had better contact between the membrane and catalyst layer. MDPI 2023-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10253925/ /pubmed/37297059 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16113925 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Li, Yizhe
Fu, Zhiyong
Li, Yifan
Zhang, Guichen
A Comparative Study of CCM and CCS Membrane Electrode Assemblies for High-Temperature Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells with a CsH(5)(PO(4))(2)-Doped Polybenzimidazole Membrane
title A Comparative Study of CCM and CCS Membrane Electrode Assemblies for High-Temperature Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells with a CsH(5)(PO(4))(2)-Doped Polybenzimidazole Membrane
title_full A Comparative Study of CCM and CCS Membrane Electrode Assemblies for High-Temperature Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells with a CsH(5)(PO(4))(2)-Doped Polybenzimidazole Membrane
title_fullStr A Comparative Study of CCM and CCS Membrane Electrode Assemblies for High-Temperature Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells with a CsH(5)(PO(4))(2)-Doped Polybenzimidazole Membrane
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Study of CCM and CCS Membrane Electrode Assemblies for High-Temperature Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells with a CsH(5)(PO(4))(2)-Doped Polybenzimidazole Membrane
title_short A Comparative Study of CCM and CCS Membrane Electrode Assemblies for High-Temperature Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells with a CsH(5)(PO(4))(2)-Doped Polybenzimidazole Membrane
title_sort comparative study of ccm and ccs membrane electrode assemblies for high-temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cells with a csh(5)(po(4))(2)-doped polybenzimidazole membrane
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10253925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37297059
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16113925
work_keys_str_mv AT liyizhe acomparativestudyofccmandccsmembraneelectrodeassembliesforhightemperatureprotonexchangemembranefuelcellswithacsh5po42dopedpolybenzimidazolemembrane
AT fuzhiyong acomparativestudyofccmandccsmembraneelectrodeassembliesforhightemperatureprotonexchangemembranefuelcellswithacsh5po42dopedpolybenzimidazolemembrane
AT liyifan acomparativestudyofccmandccsmembraneelectrodeassembliesforhightemperatureprotonexchangemembranefuelcellswithacsh5po42dopedpolybenzimidazolemembrane
AT zhangguichen acomparativestudyofccmandccsmembraneelectrodeassembliesforhightemperatureprotonexchangemembranefuelcellswithacsh5po42dopedpolybenzimidazolemembrane
AT liyizhe comparativestudyofccmandccsmembraneelectrodeassembliesforhightemperatureprotonexchangemembranefuelcellswithacsh5po42dopedpolybenzimidazolemembrane
AT fuzhiyong comparativestudyofccmandccsmembraneelectrodeassembliesforhightemperatureprotonexchangemembranefuelcellswithacsh5po42dopedpolybenzimidazolemembrane
AT liyifan comparativestudyofccmandccsmembraneelectrodeassembliesforhightemperatureprotonexchangemembranefuelcellswithacsh5po42dopedpolybenzimidazolemembrane
AT zhangguichen comparativestudyofccmandccsmembraneelectrodeassembliesforhightemperatureprotonexchangemembranefuelcellswithacsh5po42dopedpolybenzimidazolemembrane