Cargando…
A Comparative Study of CCM and CCS Membrane Electrode Assemblies for High-Temperature Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells with a CsH(5)(PO(4))(2)-Doped Polybenzimidazole Membrane
Membrane electrode assemblies (MEAs) are critical components in influencing the electrochemical performance of high-temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cells (HT-PEMFCs). MEA manufacturing processes are mainly divided into the catalyst-coated membrane (CCM) and the catalyst-coated substrate (C...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10253925/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37297059 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16113925 |
_version_ | 1785056522350362624 |
---|---|
author | Li, Yizhe Fu, Zhiyong Li, Yifan Zhang, Guichen |
author_facet | Li, Yizhe Fu, Zhiyong Li, Yifan Zhang, Guichen |
author_sort | Li, Yizhe |
collection | PubMed |
description | Membrane electrode assemblies (MEAs) are critical components in influencing the electrochemical performance of high-temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cells (HT-PEMFCs). MEA manufacturing processes are mainly divided into the catalyst-coated membrane (CCM) and the catalyst-coated substrate (CCS) methods. For conventional HT-PEMFCs based on phosphoric acid-doped polybenzimidazole (PBI) membranes, the wetting surface and extreme swelling of the PA-doped PBI membranes make the CCM method difficult to apply to the fabrication of MEAs. In this study, by taking advantage of the dry surface and low swelling of a CsH(5)(PO(4))(2)-doped PBI membrane, an MEA fabricated by the CCM method was compared with an MEA made by the CCS method. Under each temperature condition, the peak power density of the CCM-MEA was higher than that of the CCS-MEA. Furthermore, under humidified gas conditions, an enhancement in the peak power densities was observed for both MEAs, which was attributed to the increase in the conductivity of the electrolyte membrane. The CCM-MEA exhibited a peak power density of 647 mW cm(−2) at 200 °C, which was ~16% higher than that of the CCS-MEA. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy results showed that the CCM-MEA had lower ohmic resistance, which implied that it had better contact between the membrane and catalyst layer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10253925 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102539252023-06-10 A Comparative Study of CCM and CCS Membrane Electrode Assemblies for High-Temperature Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells with a CsH(5)(PO(4))(2)-Doped Polybenzimidazole Membrane Li, Yizhe Fu, Zhiyong Li, Yifan Zhang, Guichen Materials (Basel) Article Membrane electrode assemblies (MEAs) are critical components in influencing the electrochemical performance of high-temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cells (HT-PEMFCs). MEA manufacturing processes are mainly divided into the catalyst-coated membrane (CCM) and the catalyst-coated substrate (CCS) methods. For conventional HT-PEMFCs based on phosphoric acid-doped polybenzimidazole (PBI) membranes, the wetting surface and extreme swelling of the PA-doped PBI membranes make the CCM method difficult to apply to the fabrication of MEAs. In this study, by taking advantage of the dry surface and low swelling of a CsH(5)(PO(4))(2)-doped PBI membrane, an MEA fabricated by the CCM method was compared with an MEA made by the CCS method. Under each temperature condition, the peak power density of the CCM-MEA was higher than that of the CCS-MEA. Furthermore, under humidified gas conditions, an enhancement in the peak power densities was observed for both MEAs, which was attributed to the increase in the conductivity of the electrolyte membrane. The CCM-MEA exhibited a peak power density of 647 mW cm(−2) at 200 °C, which was ~16% higher than that of the CCS-MEA. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy results showed that the CCM-MEA had lower ohmic resistance, which implied that it had better contact between the membrane and catalyst layer. MDPI 2023-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10253925/ /pubmed/37297059 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16113925 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Li, Yizhe Fu, Zhiyong Li, Yifan Zhang, Guichen A Comparative Study of CCM and CCS Membrane Electrode Assemblies for High-Temperature Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells with a CsH(5)(PO(4))(2)-Doped Polybenzimidazole Membrane |
title | A Comparative Study of CCM and CCS Membrane Electrode Assemblies for High-Temperature Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells with a CsH(5)(PO(4))(2)-Doped Polybenzimidazole Membrane |
title_full | A Comparative Study of CCM and CCS Membrane Electrode Assemblies for High-Temperature Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells with a CsH(5)(PO(4))(2)-Doped Polybenzimidazole Membrane |
title_fullStr | A Comparative Study of CCM and CCS Membrane Electrode Assemblies for High-Temperature Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells with a CsH(5)(PO(4))(2)-Doped Polybenzimidazole Membrane |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparative Study of CCM and CCS Membrane Electrode Assemblies for High-Temperature Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells with a CsH(5)(PO(4))(2)-Doped Polybenzimidazole Membrane |
title_short | A Comparative Study of CCM and CCS Membrane Electrode Assemblies for High-Temperature Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells with a CsH(5)(PO(4))(2)-Doped Polybenzimidazole Membrane |
title_sort | comparative study of ccm and ccs membrane electrode assemblies for high-temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cells with a csh(5)(po(4))(2)-doped polybenzimidazole membrane |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10253925/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37297059 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16113925 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liyizhe acomparativestudyofccmandccsmembraneelectrodeassembliesforhightemperatureprotonexchangemembranefuelcellswithacsh5po42dopedpolybenzimidazolemembrane AT fuzhiyong acomparativestudyofccmandccsmembraneelectrodeassembliesforhightemperatureprotonexchangemembranefuelcellswithacsh5po42dopedpolybenzimidazolemembrane AT liyifan acomparativestudyofccmandccsmembraneelectrodeassembliesforhightemperatureprotonexchangemembranefuelcellswithacsh5po42dopedpolybenzimidazolemembrane AT zhangguichen acomparativestudyofccmandccsmembraneelectrodeassembliesforhightemperatureprotonexchangemembranefuelcellswithacsh5po42dopedpolybenzimidazolemembrane AT liyizhe comparativestudyofccmandccsmembraneelectrodeassembliesforhightemperatureprotonexchangemembranefuelcellswithacsh5po42dopedpolybenzimidazolemembrane AT fuzhiyong comparativestudyofccmandccsmembraneelectrodeassembliesforhightemperatureprotonexchangemembranefuelcellswithacsh5po42dopedpolybenzimidazolemembrane AT liyifan comparativestudyofccmandccsmembraneelectrodeassembliesforhightemperatureprotonexchangemembranefuelcellswithacsh5po42dopedpolybenzimidazolemembrane AT zhangguichen comparativestudyofccmandccsmembraneelectrodeassembliesforhightemperatureprotonexchangemembranefuelcellswithacsh5po42dopedpolybenzimidazolemembrane |