Cargando…

Systematic Review on S-ICD Lead Extraction

Background and purpose: Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillators (S-ICDs) have emerged in recent years as a valid alternative to traditional transvenous ICDs (TV-ICDs). Therefore, the number of S-ICD implantations is rising, leading to a consequent increase in S-ICD-related complications...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vio, Riccardo, Forlin, Enrico, Čulić, Viktor, Themistoclakis, Sakis, Proietti, Riccardo, China, Paolo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10254059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37297905
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12113710
_version_ 1785056553546547200
author Vio, Riccardo
Forlin, Enrico
Čulić, Viktor
Themistoclakis, Sakis
Proietti, Riccardo
China, Paolo
author_facet Vio, Riccardo
Forlin, Enrico
Čulić, Viktor
Themistoclakis, Sakis
Proietti, Riccardo
China, Paolo
author_sort Vio, Riccardo
collection PubMed
description Background and purpose: Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillators (S-ICDs) have emerged in recent years as a valid alternative to traditional transvenous ICDs (TV-ICDs). Therefore, the number of S-ICD implantations is rising, leading to a consequent increase in S-ICD-related complications sometimes requiring complete device removal. Thus, the aim of this systematic review is to gather all the available literature on S-ICD lead extraction (SLE), with particular reference to the type of indication, techniques, complications and success rate. Methods: Studies were identified by searching electronic databases (Medline via PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science) from inception to 21 November 2022. The search strategy adopted was developed using the following key words: subcutaneous, S-ICD, defibrillator, ICD, extraction, explantation. Studies were included if they met both of the following criteria: (1) inclusion of patients with S-ICD; (2) inclusion of patients who underwent SLE. Results: Our literature search identified 238 references. Based on the abstract evaluation, 38 of these citations were considered potentially eligible for inclusion, and their full texts were analyzed. We excluded 8 of these studies because no SLE was performed. Eventually, 30 studies were included, with 207 patients who underwent SLE. Overall, the majority of SLEs were performed for non-infective causes (59.90%). Infection of the device (affecting either the lead or the pocket) was the cause of SLE in 38.65% of cases. Indication data were not available in 3/207 cases. The mean dwelling time was 14 months. SLEs were performed using manual traction or with the aid of a tool designed for transvenous lead extraction (TLE), including either a rotational or non-powered mechanical dilator sheath. Conclusions: SLE is performed mainly for non-infective causes. Techniques vary greatly across different studies. Dedicated tools for SLE might be developed in the future and standard approaches should be defined. In the meantime, authors are encouraged to share their experience and data to further refine the existing variegated approaches.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10254059
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102540592023-06-10 Systematic Review on S-ICD Lead Extraction Vio, Riccardo Forlin, Enrico Čulić, Viktor Themistoclakis, Sakis Proietti, Riccardo China, Paolo J Clin Med Systematic Review Background and purpose: Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillators (S-ICDs) have emerged in recent years as a valid alternative to traditional transvenous ICDs (TV-ICDs). Therefore, the number of S-ICD implantations is rising, leading to a consequent increase in S-ICD-related complications sometimes requiring complete device removal. Thus, the aim of this systematic review is to gather all the available literature on S-ICD lead extraction (SLE), with particular reference to the type of indication, techniques, complications and success rate. Methods: Studies were identified by searching electronic databases (Medline via PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science) from inception to 21 November 2022. The search strategy adopted was developed using the following key words: subcutaneous, S-ICD, defibrillator, ICD, extraction, explantation. Studies were included if they met both of the following criteria: (1) inclusion of patients with S-ICD; (2) inclusion of patients who underwent SLE. Results: Our literature search identified 238 references. Based on the abstract evaluation, 38 of these citations were considered potentially eligible for inclusion, and their full texts were analyzed. We excluded 8 of these studies because no SLE was performed. Eventually, 30 studies were included, with 207 patients who underwent SLE. Overall, the majority of SLEs were performed for non-infective causes (59.90%). Infection of the device (affecting either the lead or the pocket) was the cause of SLE in 38.65% of cases. Indication data were not available in 3/207 cases. The mean dwelling time was 14 months. SLEs were performed using manual traction or with the aid of a tool designed for transvenous lead extraction (TLE), including either a rotational or non-powered mechanical dilator sheath. Conclusions: SLE is performed mainly for non-infective causes. Techniques vary greatly across different studies. Dedicated tools for SLE might be developed in the future and standard approaches should be defined. In the meantime, authors are encouraged to share their experience and data to further refine the existing variegated approaches. MDPI 2023-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10254059/ /pubmed/37297905 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12113710 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Vio, Riccardo
Forlin, Enrico
Čulić, Viktor
Themistoclakis, Sakis
Proietti, Riccardo
China, Paolo
Systematic Review on S-ICD Lead Extraction
title Systematic Review on S-ICD Lead Extraction
title_full Systematic Review on S-ICD Lead Extraction
title_fullStr Systematic Review on S-ICD Lead Extraction
title_full_unstemmed Systematic Review on S-ICD Lead Extraction
title_short Systematic Review on S-ICD Lead Extraction
title_sort systematic review on s-icd lead extraction
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10254059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37297905
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12113710
work_keys_str_mv AT vioriccardo systematicreviewonsicdleadextraction
AT forlinenrico systematicreviewonsicdleadextraction
AT culicviktor systematicreviewonsicdleadextraction
AT themistoclakissakis systematicreviewonsicdleadextraction
AT proiettiriccardo systematicreviewonsicdleadextraction
AT chinapaolo systematicreviewonsicdleadextraction