Cargando…
Comparative Study of the U(VI) Adsorption by Hybrid Silica-Hyperbranched Poly(ethylene imine) Nanoparticles and Xerogels
Two different silica conformations (xerogels and nanoparticles), both formed by the mediation of dendritic poly (ethylene imine), were tested at low pHs for problematic uranyl cation sorption. The effect of crucial factors, i.e., temperature, electrostatic forces, adsorbent composition, accessibilit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10254744/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37299697 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano13111794 |
_version_ | 1785056714987405312 |
---|---|
author | Arkas, Michael Giannakopoulos, Konstantinos Favvas, Evangelos P. Papageorgiou, Sergios Theodorakopoulos, George V. Giannoulatou, Artemis Vardavoulias, Michail Giannakoudakis, Dimitrios A. Triantafyllidis, Konstantinos S. Georgiou, Efthalia Pashalidis, Ioannis |
author_facet | Arkas, Michael Giannakopoulos, Konstantinos Favvas, Evangelos P. Papageorgiou, Sergios Theodorakopoulos, George V. Giannoulatou, Artemis Vardavoulias, Michail Giannakoudakis, Dimitrios A. Triantafyllidis, Konstantinos S. Georgiou, Efthalia Pashalidis, Ioannis |
author_sort | Arkas, Michael |
collection | PubMed |
description | Two different silica conformations (xerogels and nanoparticles), both formed by the mediation of dendritic poly (ethylene imine), were tested at low pHs for problematic uranyl cation sorption. The effect of crucial factors, i.e., temperature, electrostatic forces, adsorbent composition, accessibility of the pollutant to the dendritic cavities, and MW of the organic matrix, was investigated to determine the optimum formulation for water purification under these conditions. This was attained with the aid of UV-visible and FTIR spectroscopy, dynamic light scattering (DLS), ζ-potential, liquid nitrogen (LN(2)) porosimetry, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Results highlighted that both adsorbents have extraordinary sorption capacities. Xerogels are cost-effective since they approximate the performance of nanoparticles with much less organic content. Both adsorbents could be used in the form of dispersions. The xerogels, though, are more practicable materials since they may penetrate the pores of a metal or ceramic solid substrate in the form of a precursor gel-forming solution, producing composite purification devices. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10254744 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102547442023-06-10 Comparative Study of the U(VI) Adsorption by Hybrid Silica-Hyperbranched Poly(ethylene imine) Nanoparticles and Xerogels Arkas, Michael Giannakopoulos, Konstantinos Favvas, Evangelos P. Papageorgiou, Sergios Theodorakopoulos, George V. Giannoulatou, Artemis Vardavoulias, Michail Giannakoudakis, Dimitrios A. Triantafyllidis, Konstantinos S. Georgiou, Efthalia Pashalidis, Ioannis Nanomaterials (Basel) Article Two different silica conformations (xerogels and nanoparticles), both formed by the mediation of dendritic poly (ethylene imine), were tested at low pHs for problematic uranyl cation sorption. The effect of crucial factors, i.e., temperature, electrostatic forces, adsorbent composition, accessibility of the pollutant to the dendritic cavities, and MW of the organic matrix, was investigated to determine the optimum formulation for water purification under these conditions. This was attained with the aid of UV-visible and FTIR spectroscopy, dynamic light scattering (DLS), ζ-potential, liquid nitrogen (LN(2)) porosimetry, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Results highlighted that both adsorbents have extraordinary sorption capacities. Xerogels are cost-effective since they approximate the performance of nanoparticles with much less organic content. Both adsorbents could be used in the form of dispersions. The xerogels, though, are more practicable materials since they may penetrate the pores of a metal or ceramic solid substrate in the form of a precursor gel-forming solution, producing composite purification devices. MDPI 2023-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10254744/ /pubmed/37299697 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano13111794 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Arkas, Michael Giannakopoulos, Konstantinos Favvas, Evangelos P. Papageorgiou, Sergios Theodorakopoulos, George V. Giannoulatou, Artemis Vardavoulias, Michail Giannakoudakis, Dimitrios A. Triantafyllidis, Konstantinos S. Georgiou, Efthalia Pashalidis, Ioannis Comparative Study of the U(VI) Adsorption by Hybrid Silica-Hyperbranched Poly(ethylene imine) Nanoparticles and Xerogels |
title | Comparative Study of the U(VI) Adsorption by Hybrid Silica-Hyperbranched Poly(ethylene imine) Nanoparticles and Xerogels |
title_full | Comparative Study of the U(VI) Adsorption by Hybrid Silica-Hyperbranched Poly(ethylene imine) Nanoparticles and Xerogels |
title_fullStr | Comparative Study of the U(VI) Adsorption by Hybrid Silica-Hyperbranched Poly(ethylene imine) Nanoparticles and Xerogels |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Study of the U(VI) Adsorption by Hybrid Silica-Hyperbranched Poly(ethylene imine) Nanoparticles and Xerogels |
title_short | Comparative Study of the U(VI) Adsorption by Hybrid Silica-Hyperbranched Poly(ethylene imine) Nanoparticles and Xerogels |
title_sort | comparative study of the u(vi) adsorption by hybrid silica-hyperbranched poly(ethylene imine) nanoparticles and xerogels |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10254744/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37299697 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano13111794 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT arkasmichael comparativestudyoftheuviadsorptionbyhybridsilicahyperbranchedpolyethyleneiminenanoparticlesandxerogels AT giannakopouloskonstantinos comparativestudyoftheuviadsorptionbyhybridsilicahyperbranchedpolyethyleneiminenanoparticlesandxerogels AT favvasevangelosp comparativestudyoftheuviadsorptionbyhybridsilicahyperbranchedpolyethyleneiminenanoparticlesandxerogels AT papageorgiousergios comparativestudyoftheuviadsorptionbyhybridsilicahyperbranchedpolyethyleneiminenanoparticlesandxerogels AT theodorakopoulosgeorgev comparativestudyoftheuviadsorptionbyhybridsilicahyperbranchedpolyethyleneiminenanoparticlesandxerogels AT giannoulatouartemis comparativestudyoftheuviadsorptionbyhybridsilicahyperbranchedpolyethyleneiminenanoparticlesandxerogels AT vardavouliasmichail comparativestudyoftheuviadsorptionbyhybridsilicahyperbranchedpolyethyleneiminenanoparticlesandxerogels AT giannakoudakisdimitriosa comparativestudyoftheuviadsorptionbyhybridsilicahyperbranchedpolyethyleneiminenanoparticlesandxerogels AT triantafyllidiskonstantinoss comparativestudyoftheuviadsorptionbyhybridsilicahyperbranchedpolyethyleneiminenanoparticlesandxerogels AT georgiouefthalia comparativestudyoftheuviadsorptionbyhybridsilicahyperbranchedpolyethyleneiminenanoparticlesandxerogels AT pashalidisioannis comparativestudyoftheuviadsorptionbyhybridsilicahyperbranchedpolyethyleneiminenanoparticlesandxerogels |