Cargando…

Social bias in artificial intelligence algorithms designed to improve cardiovascular risk assessment relative to the Framingham Risk Score: a protocol for a systematic review

INTRODUCTION: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention relies on timely identification of and intervention for individuals at risk. Risk assessment models such as the Framingham Risk Score (FRS) have been shown to over-estimate or under-estimate risk in certain groups, such as socioeconomically disad...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garcha, Ivneet, Phillips, Susan Paula
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10254950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37258078
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067638
_version_ 1785056762561298432
author Garcha, Ivneet
Phillips, Susan Paula
author_facet Garcha, Ivneet
Phillips, Susan Paula
author_sort Garcha, Ivneet
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention relies on timely identification of and intervention for individuals at risk. Risk assessment models such as the Framingham Risk Score (FRS) have been shown to over-estimate or under-estimate risk in certain groups, such as socioeconomically disadvantaged populations. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) could be used to address such equity gaps to improve risk assessment; however, critical appraisal is warranted before ML-informed clinical decision-making is implemented. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study will employ an equity-lens to identify sources of bias (ie, race/ethnicity, gender and social stratum) in ML algorithms designed to improve CVD risk assessment relative to the FRS. A comprehensive literature search will be completed using MEDLINE, Embase and IEEE to answer the research question: do AI algorithms that are designed for the estimation of CVD risk and that compare performance with the FRS address the sources of bias inherent in the FRS? No study date filters will be imposed on the search, but English language filters will be applied. Studies describing a specific algorithm or ML approach that provided a risk assessment output for coronary artery disease, heart failure, cardiac arrhythmias (ie, atrial fibrillation), stroke or a global CVD risk score, and that compared performance with the FRS are eligible for inclusion. Papers describing algorithms for the diagnosis rather than the prevention of CVD will be excluded. A structured narrative review analysis of included studies will be completed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was not required. Ethics exemption was formally received from the General Research Ethics Board at Queen’s University. The completed systematic review will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal and parts of the work will be presented at relevant conferences.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10254950
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102549502023-06-10 Social bias in artificial intelligence algorithms designed to improve cardiovascular risk assessment relative to the Framingham Risk Score: a protocol for a systematic review Garcha, Ivneet Phillips, Susan Paula BMJ Open General practice / Family practice INTRODUCTION: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention relies on timely identification of and intervention for individuals at risk. Risk assessment models such as the Framingham Risk Score (FRS) have been shown to over-estimate or under-estimate risk in certain groups, such as socioeconomically disadvantaged populations. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) could be used to address such equity gaps to improve risk assessment; however, critical appraisal is warranted before ML-informed clinical decision-making is implemented. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study will employ an equity-lens to identify sources of bias (ie, race/ethnicity, gender and social stratum) in ML algorithms designed to improve CVD risk assessment relative to the FRS. A comprehensive literature search will be completed using MEDLINE, Embase and IEEE to answer the research question: do AI algorithms that are designed for the estimation of CVD risk and that compare performance with the FRS address the sources of bias inherent in the FRS? No study date filters will be imposed on the search, but English language filters will be applied. Studies describing a specific algorithm or ML approach that provided a risk assessment output for coronary artery disease, heart failure, cardiac arrhythmias (ie, atrial fibrillation), stroke or a global CVD risk score, and that compared performance with the FRS are eligible for inclusion. Papers describing algorithms for the diagnosis rather than the prevention of CVD will be excluded. A structured narrative review analysis of included studies will be completed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was not required. Ethics exemption was formally received from the General Research Ethics Board at Queen’s University. The completed systematic review will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal and parts of the work will be presented at relevant conferences. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10254950/ /pubmed/37258078 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067638 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle General practice / Family practice
Garcha, Ivneet
Phillips, Susan Paula
Social bias in artificial intelligence algorithms designed to improve cardiovascular risk assessment relative to the Framingham Risk Score: a protocol for a systematic review
title Social bias in artificial intelligence algorithms designed to improve cardiovascular risk assessment relative to the Framingham Risk Score: a protocol for a systematic review
title_full Social bias in artificial intelligence algorithms designed to improve cardiovascular risk assessment relative to the Framingham Risk Score: a protocol for a systematic review
title_fullStr Social bias in artificial intelligence algorithms designed to improve cardiovascular risk assessment relative to the Framingham Risk Score: a protocol for a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Social bias in artificial intelligence algorithms designed to improve cardiovascular risk assessment relative to the Framingham Risk Score: a protocol for a systematic review
title_short Social bias in artificial intelligence algorithms designed to improve cardiovascular risk assessment relative to the Framingham Risk Score: a protocol for a systematic review
title_sort social bias in artificial intelligence algorithms designed to improve cardiovascular risk assessment relative to the framingham risk score: a protocol for a systematic review
topic General practice / Family practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10254950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37258078
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067638
work_keys_str_mv AT garchaivneet socialbiasinartificialintelligencealgorithmsdesignedtoimprovecardiovascularriskassessmentrelativetotheframinghamriskscoreaprotocolforasystematicreview
AT phillipssusanpaula socialbiasinartificialintelligencealgorithmsdesignedtoimprovecardiovascularriskassessmentrelativetotheframinghamriskscoreaprotocolforasystematicreview