Cargando…

Patient–clinician dynamics in remote consultations: a qualitative study of cardiology and rheumatology outpatient clinics in the UK

OBJECTIVE: Explore the experiences of patients and clinicians in rheumatology and cardiology outpatient clinics during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on the impact of remote consultations on interpersonal dynamics. DESIGN: Qualitative study using semistructured interviews, conduct...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grey, Elisabeth, Brown, Frankie, Smith, Paula, Springett, Daniella, Augustine, Dan, Sengupta, Raj, Peacock, Oliver, Gillison, Fiona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10254951/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37253488
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070923
_version_ 1785056762810859520
author Grey, Elisabeth
Brown, Frankie
Smith, Paula
Springett, Daniella
Augustine, Dan
Sengupta, Raj
Peacock, Oliver
Gillison, Fiona
author_facet Grey, Elisabeth
Brown, Frankie
Smith, Paula
Springett, Daniella
Augustine, Dan
Sengupta, Raj
Peacock, Oliver
Gillison, Fiona
author_sort Grey, Elisabeth
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Explore the experiences of patients and clinicians in rheumatology and cardiology outpatient clinics during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on the impact of remote consultations on interpersonal dynamics. DESIGN: Qualitative study using semistructured interviews, conducted between February and June 2021. SETTING: The rheumatology and cardiology departments of a general hospital in England, UK. PARTICIPANTS: All clinicians and a convenience sample of 100 patients in each department who had taken part in a remote consultation in the past month were invited to take part. Twenty-five interviews were conducted (13 with patients, 12 with clinicians). RESULTS: Three themes were developed through the analysis: adapting to the dynamics of remote consultations, impact on the patient’s experience and impact on the clinician’s experience. The majority of remote consultations experienced by both patients and clinicians had been via telephone. Both clinicians and patients found remote consultations to be more business-like and focused, with the absence of pauses restricting time for reflection. For patients with stable, well-managed conditions, remote consultations were felt to be appropriate and could be more convenient than in-person consultations. However, the loss of visual cues meant some patients felt they could not give a holistic view of their condition and limited clinicians’ ability to gather and convey information. Clinicians adjusted their approach by asking more questions, checking understanding more frequently and expressing empathy verbally, but felt patients still shared fewer concerns remotely than in person; a perception with which patients concurred. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the importance of ensuring, for each patient, that remote care is appropriate. Future research should focus on developing ways to support both clinicians and patients to gather and provide all information necessary during remote consultations, to enhance communication and trust.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10254951
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102549512023-06-10 Patient–clinician dynamics in remote consultations: a qualitative study of cardiology and rheumatology outpatient clinics in the UK Grey, Elisabeth Brown, Frankie Smith, Paula Springett, Daniella Augustine, Dan Sengupta, Raj Peacock, Oliver Gillison, Fiona BMJ Open Qualitative Research OBJECTIVE: Explore the experiences of patients and clinicians in rheumatology and cardiology outpatient clinics during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on the impact of remote consultations on interpersonal dynamics. DESIGN: Qualitative study using semistructured interviews, conducted between February and June 2021. SETTING: The rheumatology and cardiology departments of a general hospital in England, UK. PARTICIPANTS: All clinicians and a convenience sample of 100 patients in each department who had taken part in a remote consultation in the past month were invited to take part. Twenty-five interviews were conducted (13 with patients, 12 with clinicians). RESULTS: Three themes were developed through the analysis: adapting to the dynamics of remote consultations, impact on the patient’s experience and impact on the clinician’s experience. The majority of remote consultations experienced by both patients and clinicians had been via telephone. Both clinicians and patients found remote consultations to be more business-like and focused, with the absence of pauses restricting time for reflection. For patients with stable, well-managed conditions, remote consultations were felt to be appropriate and could be more convenient than in-person consultations. However, the loss of visual cues meant some patients felt they could not give a holistic view of their condition and limited clinicians’ ability to gather and convey information. Clinicians adjusted their approach by asking more questions, checking understanding more frequently and expressing empathy verbally, but felt patients still shared fewer concerns remotely than in person; a perception with which patients concurred. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the importance of ensuring, for each patient, that remote care is appropriate. Future research should focus on developing ways to support both clinicians and patients to gather and provide all information necessary during remote consultations, to enhance communication and trust. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10254951/ /pubmed/37253488 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070923 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Qualitative Research
Grey, Elisabeth
Brown, Frankie
Smith, Paula
Springett, Daniella
Augustine, Dan
Sengupta, Raj
Peacock, Oliver
Gillison, Fiona
Patient–clinician dynamics in remote consultations: a qualitative study of cardiology and rheumatology outpatient clinics in the UK
title Patient–clinician dynamics in remote consultations: a qualitative study of cardiology and rheumatology outpatient clinics in the UK
title_full Patient–clinician dynamics in remote consultations: a qualitative study of cardiology and rheumatology outpatient clinics in the UK
title_fullStr Patient–clinician dynamics in remote consultations: a qualitative study of cardiology and rheumatology outpatient clinics in the UK
title_full_unstemmed Patient–clinician dynamics in remote consultations: a qualitative study of cardiology and rheumatology outpatient clinics in the UK
title_short Patient–clinician dynamics in remote consultations: a qualitative study of cardiology and rheumatology outpatient clinics in the UK
title_sort patient–clinician dynamics in remote consultations: a qualitative study of cardiology and rheumatology outpatient clinics in the uk
topic Qualitative Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10254951/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37253488
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070923
work_keys_str_mv AT greyelisabeth patientcliniciandynamicsinremoteconsultationsaqualitativestudyofcardiologyandrheumatologyoutpatientclinicsintheuk
AT brownfrankie patientcliniciandynamicsinremoteconsultationsaqualitativestudyofcardiologyandrheumatologyoutpatientclinicsintheuk
AT smithpaula patientcliniciandynamicsinremoteconsultationsaqualitativestudyofcardiologyandrheumatologyoutpatientclinicsintheuk
AT springettdaniella patientcliniciandynamicsinremoteconsultationsaqualitativestudyofcardiologyandrheumatologyoutpatientclinicsintheuk
AT augustinedan patientcliniciandynamicsinremoteconsultationsaqualitativestudyofcardiologyandrheumatologyoutpatientclinicsintheuk
AT senguptaraj patientcliniciandynamicsinremoteconsultationsaqualitativestudyofcardiologyandrheumatologyoutpatientclinicsintheuk
AT peacockoliver patientcliniciandynamicsinremoteconsultationsaqualitativestudyofcardiologyandrheumatologyoutpatientclinicsintheuk
AT gillisonfiona patientcliniciandynamicsinremoteconsultationsaqualitativestudyofcardiologyandrheumatologyoutpatientclinicsintheuk