Cargando…

Ciprofol versus propofol for sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION: Painless gastrointestinal endoscopy is being increasingly practised in the clinical field. The management and choice of sedation are important during the endoscopy procedure to reduce patient discomfort and facilitate high disease detection rates. Ciprofol is principally an agonist of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qin, Xiaoyu, Lu, Xiaoting, Tang, Lu, Wang, Chunai, Xue, Jianjun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10255017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37258073
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071438
_version_ 1785056773619580928
author Qin, Xiaoyu
Lu, Xiaoting
Tang, Lu
Wang, Chunai
Xue, Jianjun
author_facet Qin, Xiaoyu
Lu, Xiaoting
Tang, Lu
Wang, Chunai
Xue, Jianjun
author_sort Qin, Xiaoyu
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Painless gastrointestinal endoscopy is being increasingly practised in the clinical field. The management and choice of sedation are important during the endoscopy procedure to reduce patient discomfort and facilitate high disease detection rates. Ciprofol is principally an agonist of the γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor; it comprises the active ingredient HSK3486, which is similar to the currently used intravenous anaesthetic propofol in clinical practice. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing ciprofol and propofol will be conducted to assess their efficacy and safety during endoscopy. Before starting the study, we describe the specific protocol of this systematic review. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol was prepared in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols 2015. The following databases will be searched: Embase, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, Chinese Biomedical Literature Service System, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, China Science and Technology Journal Database and a clinical trial registry. The database search strategy will adopt a combination of subject words and free words. Randomised controlled trials related to ciprofol use for sedation during gastrointestinal endoscopy will also be included. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, two researchers will independently screen the articles and extracted data. Following the qualitative evaluation of each study, analysis will be conducted using Review Manager software. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol for this systematic review and meta-analysis involves no individual patient data; thus, ethical approval is not required. This will be the first meta-analysis to assess the sedation efficacy of ciprofol and provide evidence to clinicians for decision-making. The results will be disseminated through conference presentations and publications in peer-review journals related to this field. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022370047.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10255017
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102550172023-06-10 Ciprofol versus propofol for sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis Qin, Xiaoyu Lu, Xiaoting Tang, Lu Wang, Chunai Xue, Jianjun BMJ Open Anaesthesia INTRODUCTION: Painless gastrointestinal endoscopy is being increasingly practised in the clinical field. The management and choice of sedation are important during the endoscopy procedure to reduce patient discomfort and facilitate high disease detection rates. Ciprofol is principally an agonist of the γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor; it comprises the active ingredient HSK3486, which is similar to the currently used intravenous anaesthetic propofol in clinical practice. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing ciprofol and propofol will be conducted to assess their efficacy and safety during endoscopy. Before starting the study, we describe the specific protocol of this systematic review. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol was prepared in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols 2015. The following databases will be searched: Embase, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, Chinese Biomedical Literature Service System, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, China Science and Technology Journal Database and a clinical trial registry. The database search strategy will adopt a combination of subject words and free words. Randomised controlled trials related to ciprofol use for sedation during gastrointestinal endoscopy will also be included. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, two researchers will independently screen the articles and extracted data. Following the qualitative evaluation of each study, analysis will be conducted using Review Manager software. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol for this systematic review and meta-analysis involves no individual patient data; thus, ethical approval is not required. This will be the first meta-analysis to assess the sedation efficacy of ciprofol and provide evidence to clinicians for decision-making. The results will be disseminated through conference presentations and publications in peer-review journals related to this field. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022370047. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10255017/ /pubmed/37258073 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071438 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Anaesthesia
Qin, Xiaoyu
Lu, Xiaoting
Tang, Lu
Wang, Chunai
Xue, Jianjun
Ciprofol versus propofol for sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Ciprofol versus propofol for sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Ciprofol versus propofol for sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Ciprofol versus propofol for sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Ciprofol versus propofol for sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Ciprofol versus propofol for sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort ciprofol versus propofol for sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Anaesthesia
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10255017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37258073
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071438
work_keys_str_mv AT qinxiaoyu ciprofolversuspropofolforsedationingastrointestinalendoscopyprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT luxiaoting ciprofolversuspropofolforsedationingastrointestinalendoscopyprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tanglu ciprofolversuspropofolforsedationingastrointestinalendoscopyprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangchunai ciprofolversuspropofolforsedationingastrointestinalendoscopyprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xuejianjun ciprofolversuspropofolforsedationingastrointestinalendoscopyprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis