Cargando…

Flame Retardancy Index (FRI) for Polymer Materials Ranking

In 2019, we introduced Flame Retardancy Index (FRI) as a universal dimensionless index for the classification of flame-retardant polymer materials (Polymers, 2019, 11(3), 407). FRI simply takes the peak of Heat Release Rate (pHRR), Total Heat Release (THR), and Time-To-Ignition (t(i)) from cone calo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vahabi, Henri, Movahedifar, Elnaz, Kandola, Baljinder K., Saeb, Mohammad Reza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10255182/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37299221
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15112422
_version_ 1785056809523871744
author Vahabi, Henri
Movahedifar, Elnaz
Kandola, Baljinder K.
Saeb, Mohammad Reza
author_facet Vahabi, Henri
Movahedifar, Elnaz
Kandola, Baljinder K.
Saeb, Mohammad Reza
author_sort Vahabi, Henri
collection PubMed
description In 2019, we introduced Flame Retardancy Index (FRI) as a universal dimensionless index for the classification of flame-retardant polymer materials (Polymers, 2019, 11(3), 407). FRI simply takes the peak of Heat Release Rate (pHRR), Total Heat Release (THR), and Time-To-Ignition (t(i)) from cone calorimetry data and quantifies the flame retardancy performance of polymer composites with respect to the blank polymer (the reference sample) on a logarithmic scale, as of Poor (FRI ˂ 10(0)), Good (10(0) ≤ FRI ˂ 10(1)), or Excellent (FRI ≥ 10(1)). Although initially applied to categorize thermoplastic composites, the versatility of FRI was later verified upon analyzing several sets of data collected from investigations/reports on thermoset composites. Over four years from the time FRI was introduced, we have adequate proof of FRI reliability for polymer materials ranking in terms of flame retardancy performance. Since the mission of FRI was to roughly classify flame-retardant polymer materials, its simplicity of usage and fast performance quantification were highly valued. Herein, we answered the question “does inclusion of additional cone calorimetry parameters, e.g., the time to pHRR (t(p)), affect the predictability of FRI?”. In this regard, we defined new variants to evaluate classification capability and variation interval of FRI. We also defined the Flammability Index (FI) based on Pyrolysis Combustion Flow Calorimetry (PCFC) data to invite specialists for analysis of the relationship between the FRI and FI, which may deepen our understanding of the flame retardancy mechanisms of the condensed and gas phases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10255182
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102551822023-06-10 Flame Retardancy Index (FRI) for Polymer Materials Ranking Vahabi, Henri Movahedifar, Elnaz Kandola, Baljinder K. Saeb, Mohammad Reza Polymers (Basel) Communication In 2019, we introduced Flame Retardancy Index (FRI) as a universal dimensionless index for the classification of flame-retardant polymer materials (Polymers, 2019, 11(3), 407). FRI simply takes the peak of Heat Release Rate (pHRR), Total Heat Release (THR), and Time-To-Ignition (t(i)) from cone calorimetry data and quantifies the flame retardancy performance of polymer composites with respect to the blank polymer (the reference sample) on a logarithmic scale, as of Poor (FRI ˂ 10(0)), Good (10(0) ≤ FRI ˂ 10(1)), or Excellent (FRI ≥ 10(1)). Although initially applied to categorize thermoplastic composites, the versatility of FRI was later verified upon analyzing several sets of data collected from investigations/reports on thermoset composites. Over four years from the time FRI was introduced, we have adequate proof of FRI reliability for polymer materials ranking in terms of flame retardancy performance. Since the mission of FRI was to roughly classify flame-retardant polymer materials, its simplicity of usage and fast performance quantification were highly valued. Herein, we answered the question “does inclusion of additional cone calorimetry parameters, e.g., the time to pHRR (t(p)), affect the predictability of FRI?”. In this regard, we defined new variants to evaluate classification capability and variation interval of FRI. We also defined the Flammability Index (FI) based on Pyrolysis Combustion Flow Calorimetry (PCFC) data to invite specialists for analysis of the relationship between the FRI and FI, which may deepen our understanding of the flame retardancy mechanisms of the condensed and gas phases. MDPI 2023-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10255182/ /pubmed/37299221 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15112422 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Communication
Vahabi, Henri
Movahedifar, Elnaz
Kandola, Baljinder K.
Saeb, Mohammad Reza
Flame Retardancy Index (FRI) for Polymer Materials Ranking
title Flame Retardancy Index (FRI) for Polymer Materials Ranking
title_full Flame Retardancy Index (FRI) for Polymer Materials Ranking
title_fullStr Flame Retardancy Index (FRI) for Polymer Materials Ranking
title_full_unstemmed Flame Retardancy Index (FRI) for Polymer Materials Ranking
title_short Flame Retardancy Index (FRI) for Polymer Materials Ranking
title_sort flame retardancy index (fri) for polymer materials ranking
topic Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10255182/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37299221
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15112422
work_keys_str_mv AT vahabihenri flameretardancyindexfriforpolymermaterialsranking
AT movahedifarelnaz flameretardancyindexfriforpolymermaterialsranking
AT kandolabaljinderk flameretardancyindexfriforpolymermaterialsranking
AT saebmohammadreza flameretardancyindexfriforpolymermaterialsranking