Cargando…

Common factors, Responsiveness and Outcome in Psychotherapy (CROP): study protocol for a naturalistic prospective cohort study of psychotherapy in Denmark

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the Common factors, Responsiveness and Outcome in Psychotherapy (CROP) study is to identify client and psychologist characteristics and therapeutic processes associated with the outcome of psychotherapy delivered by psychologists employed in the Danish primary sector or full...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lauritzen, Line Rettig, Faye Jacobsen, Celia, Nielsen, Jan, Lunn, Susanne, Mathiesen, Birgit Bork, Falkenström, Fredrik, Poulsen, Stig
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10255252/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37270190
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072277
_version_ 1785056826391265280
author Lauritzen, Line Rettig
Faye Jacobsen, Celia
Nielsen, Jan
Lunn, Susanne
Mathiesen, Birgit Bork
Falkenström, Fredrik
Poulsen, Stig
author_facet Lauritzen, Line Rettig
Faye Jacobsen, Celia
Nielsen, Jan
Lunn, Susanne
Mathiesen, Birgit Bork
Falkenström, Fredrik
Poulsen, Stig
author_sort Lauritzen, Line Rettig
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The aim of the Common factors, Responsiveness and Outcome in Psychotherapy (CROP) study is to identify client and psychologist characteristics and therapeutic processes associated with the outcome of psychotherapy delivered by psychologists employed in the Danish primary sector or fully self-employed. The study addresses two main questions. First, how are specific characteristics of clients and psychologists related to the outcome of therapy and do these characteristics moderate the outcome of different psychotherapeutic approaches? Second, to what extent do therapists adapt their approach to client characteristics and preferences and how does such responsiveness impact the process and outcome of therapy? METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study is a naturalistic prospective cohort study carried out in collaboration with psychologists in private practice in Denmark. Self-reported data are collected from the participating psychologists and their participating clients before, during (weekly and postsession) and after psychotherapy (at end of treatment and 3 months follow-up). The estimated target sample size is 573 clients. The data are analysed using multilevel modelling and structural equation modelling approaches to capture predictors and moderators of the effect and rate of change in psychotherapy as well as session-to-session changes during the therapy process. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the IRB at the Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen (IRB number: IP-IRB/01082018) and the Danish Data Protection Agency. All study data are fully anonymised and all clients have given informed consent to participation in the study. The study findings will be presented in articles in international, peer-reviewed journals as well as to psychotherapy practitioners and other professionals across Denmark. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05630560.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10255252
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102552522023-06-10 Common factors, Responsiveness and Outcome in Psychotherapy (CROP): study protocol for a naturalistic prospective cohort study of psychotherapy in Denmark Lauritzen, Line Rettig Faye Jacobsen, Celia Nielsen, Jan Lunn, Susanne Mathiesen, Birgit Bork Falkenström, Fredrik Poulsen, Stig BMJ Open Mental Health INTRODUCTION: The aim of the Common factors, Responsiveness and Outcome in Psychotherapy (CROP) study is to identify client and psychologist characteristics and therapeutic processes associated with the outcome of psychotherapy delivered by psychologists employed in the Danish primary sector or fully self-employed. The study addresses two main questions. First, how are specific characteristics of clients and psychologists related to the outcome of therapy and do these characteristics moderate the outcome of different psychotherapeutic approaches? Second, to what extent do therapists adapt their approach to client characteristics and preferences and how does such responsiveness impact the process and outcome of therapy? METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study is a naturalistic prospective cohort study carried out in collaboration with psychologists in private practice in Denmark. Self-reported data are collected from the participating psychologists and their participating clients before, during (weekly and postsession) and after psychotherapy (at end of treatment and 3 months follow-up). The estimated target sample size is 573 clients. The data are analysed using multilevel modelling and structural equation modelling approaches to capture predictors and moderators of the effect and rate of change in psychotherapy as well as session-to-session changes during the therapy process. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the IRB at the Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen (IRB number: IP-IRB/01082018) and the Danish Data Protection Agency. All study data are fully anonymised and all clients have given informed consent to participation in the study. The study findings will be presented in articles in international, peer-reviewed journals as well as to psychotherapy practitioners and other professionals across Denmark. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05630560. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10255252/ /pubmed/37270190 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072277 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Mental Health
Lauritzen, Line Rettig
Faye Jacobsen, Celia
Nielsen, Jan
Lunn, Susanne
Mathiesen, Birgit Bork
Falkenström, Fredrik
Poulsen, Stig
Common factors, Responsiveness and Outcome in Psychotherapy (CROP): study protocol for a naturalistic prospective cohort study of psychotherapy in Denmark
title Common factors, Responsiveness and Outcome in Psychotherapy (CROP): study protocol for a naturalistic prospective cohort study of psychotherapy in Denmark
title_full Common factors, Responsiveness and Outcome in Psychotherapy (CROP): study protocol for a naturalistic prospective cohort study of psychotherapy in Denmark
title_fullStr Common factors, Responsiveness and Outcome in Psychotherapy (CROP): study protocol for a naturalistic prospective cohort study of psychotherapy in Denmark
title_full_unstemmed Common factors, Responsiveness and Outcome in Psychotherapy (CROP): study protocol for a naturalistic prospective cohort study of psychotherapy in Denmark
title_short Common factors, Responsiveness and Outcome in Psychotherapy (CROP): study protocol for a naturalistic prospective cohort study of psychotherapy in Denmark
title_sort common factors, responsiveness and outcome in psychotherapy (crop): study protocol for a naturalistic prospective cohort study of psychotherapy in denmark
topic Mental Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10255252/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37270190
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072277
work_keys_str_mv AT lauritzenlinerettig commonfactorsresponsivenessandoutcomeinpsychotherapycropstudyprotocolforanaturalisticprospectivecohortstudyofpsychotherapyindenmark
AT fayejacobsencelia commonfactorsresponsivenessandoutcomeinpsychotherapycropstudyprotocolforanaturalisticprospectivecohortstudyofpsychotherapyindenmark
AT nielsenjan commonfactorsresponsivenessandoutcomeinpsychotherapycropstudyprotocolforanaturalisticprospectivecohortstudyofpsychotherapyindenmark
AT lunnsusanne commonfactorsresponsivenessandoutcomeinpsychotherapycropstudyprotocolforanaturalisticprospectivecohortstudyofpsychotherapyindenmark
AT mathiesenbirgitbork commonfactorsresponsivenessandoutcomeinpsychotherapycropstudyprotocolforanaturalisticprospectivecohortstudyofpsychotherapyindenmark
AT falkenstromfredrik commonfactorsresponsivenessandoutcomeinpsychotherapycropstudyprotocolforanaturalisticprospectivecohortstudyofpsychotherapyindenmark
AT poulsenstig commonfactorsresponsivenessandoutcomeinpsychotherapycropstudyprotocolforanaturalisticprospectivecohortstudyofpsychotherapyindenmark