Cargando…
The Role of Chromatin Modifications in the Evolution of Giant Plant Genomes
Angiosperm genome sizes (GS) range ~2400-fold and comprise genes and their regulatory regions, repeats, semi-degraded repeats, and ‘dark matter’. The latter represents repeats so degraded that they can no longer be recognised as repetitive. In exploring whether the histone modifications associated w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10255368/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37299136 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12112159 |
_version_ | 1785056854697574400 |
---|---|
author | Leitch, Andrew R. Ma, Lu Dodsworth, Steven Fuchs, Jörg Houben, Andreas Leitch, Ilia J. |
author_facet | Leitch, Andrew R. Ma, Lu Dodsworth, Steven Fuchs, Jörg Houben, Andreas Leitch, Ilia J. |
author_sort | Leitch, Andrew R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Angiosperm genome sizes (GS) range ~2400-fold and comprise genes and their regulatory regions, repeats, semi-degraded repeats, and ‘dark matter’. The latter represents repeats so degraded that they can no longer be recognised as repetitive. In exploring whether the histone modifications associated with chromatin packaging of these contrasting genomic components are conserved across the diversity of GS in angiosperms, we compared immunocytochemistry data for two species whose GS differ ~286-fold. We compared published data for Arabidopsis thaliana with a small genome (GS = 157 Mbp/1C) with newly generated data from Fritillaria imperialis, which has a giant genome (GS = 45,000 Mbp/1C). We compared the distributions of the following histone marks: H3K4me1, H3K4me2, H3K9me1, H3K9me2, H3K9me3, H3K27me1, H3K27me2, and H3K27me3. Assuming these histone marks are associated with the same genomic features across all species, irrespective of GS, our comparative analysis enables us to suggest that while H3K4me1 and H3K4me2 methylation identifies genic DNA, H3K9me3 and H3K27me3 marks are associated with ‘dark matter’, H3K9me1 and H3K27me1 mark highly homogeneous repeats, and H3K9me2 and H3K27me2 mark semi-degraded repeats. The results have implications for our understanding of epigenetic profiles, chromatin packaging and the divergence of genomes, and highlight contrasting organizations of the chromatin within the nucleus depending on GS itself. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10255368 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102553682023-06-10 The Role of Chromatin Modifications in the Evolution of Giant Plant Genomes Leitch, Andrew R. Ma, Lu Dodsworth, Steven Fuchs, Jörg Houben, Andreas Leitch, Ilia J. Plants (Basel) Article Angiosperm genome sizes (GS) range ~2400-fold and comprise genes and their regulatory regions, repeats, semi-degraded repeats, and ‘dark matter’. The latter represents repeats so degraded that they can no longer be recognised as repetitive. In exploring whether the histone modifications associated with chromatin packaging of these contrasting genomic components are conserved across the diversity of GS in angiosperms, we compared immunocytochemistry data for two species whose GS differ ~286-fold. We compared published data for Arabidopsis thaliana with a small genome (GS = 157 Mbp/1C) with newly generated data from Fritillaria imperialis, which has a giant genome (GS = 45,000 Mbp/1C). We compared the distributions of the following histone marks: H3K4me1, H3K4me2, H3K9me1, H3K9me2, H3K9me3, H3K27me1, H3K27me2, and H3K27me3. Assuming these histone marks are associated with the same genomic features across all species, irrespective of GS, our comparative analysis enables us to suggest that while H3K4me1 and H3K4me2 methylation identifies genic DNA, H3K9me3 and H3K27me3 marks are associated with ‘dark matter’, H3K9me1 and H3K27me1 mark highly homogeneous repeats, and H3K9me2 and H3K27me2 mark semi-degraded repeats. The results have implications for our understanding of epigenetic profiles, chromatin packaging and the divergence of genomes, and highlight contrasting organizations of the chromatin within the nucleus depending on GS itself. MDPI 2023-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10255368/ /pubmed/37299136 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12112159 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Leitch, Andrew R. Ma, Lu Dodsworth, Steven Fuchs, Jörg Houben, Andreas Leitch, Ilia J. The Role of Chromatin Modifications in the Evolution of Giant Plant Genomes |
title | The Role of Chromatin Modifications in the Evolution of Giant Plant Genomes |
title_full | The Role of Chromatin Modifications in the Evolution of Giant Plant Genomes |
title_fullStr | The Role of Chromatin Modifications in the Evolution of Giant Plant Genomes |
title_full_unstemmed | The Role of Chromatin Modifications in the Evolution of Giant Plant Genomes |
title_short | The Role of Chromatin Modifications in the Evolution of Giant Plant Genomes |
title_sort | role of chromatin modifications in the evolution of giant plant genomes |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10255368/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37299136 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12112159 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leitchandrewr theroleofchromatinmodificationsintheevolutionofgiantplantgenomes AT malu theroleofchromatinmodificationsintheevolutionofgiantplantgenomes AT dodsworthsteven theroleofchromatinmodificationsintheevolutionofgiantplantgenomes AT fuchsjorg theroleofchromatinmodificationsintheevolutionofgiantplantgenomes AT houbenandreas theroleofchromatinmodificationsintheevolutionofgiantplantgenomes AT leitchiliaj theroleofchromatinmodificationsintheevolutionofgiantplantgenomes AT leitchandrewr roleofchromatinmodificationsintheevolutionofgiantplantgenomes AT malu roleofchromatinmodificationsintheevolutionofgiantplantgenomes AT dodsworthsteven roleofchromatinmodificationsintheevolutionofgiantplantgenomes AT fuchsjorg roleofchromatinmodificationsintheevolutionofgiantplantgenomes AT houbenandreas roleofchromatinmodificationsintheevolutionofgiantplantgenomes AT leitchiliaj roleofchromatinmodificationsintheevolutionofgiantplantgenomes |