Cargando…

eXclusionarY: 10 years later, where are the sex chromosomes in GWASs?

10 years ago, a detailed analysis showed that only 33% of genome-wide association study (GWAS) results included the X chromosome. Multiple recommendations were made to combat such exclusion. Here, we re-surveyed the research landscape to determine whether these earlier recommendations had been trans...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sun, Lei, Wang, Zhong, Lu, Tianyuan, Manolio, Teri A., Paterson, Andrew D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10257007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37267899
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2023.04.009
_version_ 1785057226291937280
author Sun, Lei
Wang, Zhong
Lu, Tianyuan
Manolio, Teri A.
Paterson, Andrew D.
author_facet Sun, Lei
Wang, Zhong
Lu, Tianyuan
Manolio, Teri A.
Paterson, Andrew D.
author_sort Sun, Lei
collection PubMed
description 10 years ago, a detailed analysis showed that only 33% of genome-wide association study (GWAS) results included the X chromosome. Multiple recommendations were made to combat such exclusion. Here, we re-surveyed the research landscape to determine whether these earlier recommendations had been translated. Unfortunately, among the genome-wide summary statistics reported in 2021 in the NHGRI-EBI GWAS Catalog, only 25% provided results for the X chromosome and 3% for the Y chromosome, suggesting that the exclusion phenomenon not only persists but has also expanded into an exclusionary problem. Normalizing by physical length of the chromosome, the average number of studies published through November 2022 with genome-wide-significant findings on the X chromosome is ∼1 study/Mb. By contrast, it ranges from ∼6 to ∼16 studies/Mb for chromosomes 4 and 19, respectively. Compared with the autosomal growth rate of ∼0.086 studies/Mb/year over the last decade, studies of the X chromosome grew at less than one-seventh that rate, only ∼0.012 studies/Mb/year. Among the studies that reported significant associations on the X chromosome, we noted extreme heterogeneities in data analysis and reporting of results, suggesting the need for clear guidelines. Unsurprisingly, among the 430 scores sampled from the PolyGenic Score Catalog, 0% contained weights for sex chromosomal SNPs. To overcome the dearth of sex chromosome analyses, we provide five sets of recommendations and future directions. Finally, until the sex chromosomes are included in a whole-genome study, instead of GWASs, we propose such studies would more properly be referred to as “AWASs,” meaning “autosome-wide scans.”
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10257007
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102570072023-06-11 eXclusionarY: 10 years later, where are the sex chromosomes in GWASs? Sun, Lei Wang, Zhong Lu, Tianyuan Manolio, Teri A. Paterson, Andrew D. Am J Hum Genet Technology Review 10 years ago, a detailed analysis showed that only 33% of genome-wide association study (GWAS) results included the X chromosome. Multiple recommendations were made to combat such exclusion. Here, we re-surveyed the research landscape to determine whether these earlier recommendations had been translated. Unfortunately, among the genome-wide summary statistics reported in 2021 in the NHGRI-EBI GWAS Catalog, only 25% provided results for the X chromosome and 3% for the Y chromosome, suggesting that the exclusion phenomenon not only persists but has also expanded into an exclusionary problem. Normalizing by physical length of the chromosome, the average number of studies published through November 2022 with genome-wide-significant findings on the X chromosome is ∼1 study/Mb. By contrast, it ranges from ∼6 to ∼16 studies/Mb for chromosomes 4 and 19, respectively. Compared with the autosomal growth rate of ∼0.086 studies/Mb/year over the last decade, studies of the X chromosome grew at less than one-seventh that rate, only ∼0.012 studies/Mb/year. Among the studies that reported significant associations on the X chromosome, we noted extreme heterogeneities in data analysis and reporting of results, suggesting the need for clear guidelines. Unsurprisingly, among the 430 scores sampled from the PolyGenic Score Catalog, 0% contained weights for sex chromosomal SNPs. To overcome the dearth of sex chromosome analyses, we provide five sets of recommendations and future directions. Finally, until the sex chromosomes are included in a whole-genome study, instead of GWASs, we propose such studies would more properly be referred to as “AWASs,” meaning “autosome-wide scans.” Elsevier 2023-06-01 2023-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10257007/ /pubmed/37267899 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2023.04.009 Text en © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Technology Review
Sun, Lei
Wang, Zhong
Lu, Tianyuan
Manolio, Teri A.
Paterson, Andrew D.
eXclusionarY: 10 years later, where are the sex chromosomes in GWASs?
title eXclusionarY: 10 years later, where are the sex chromosomes in GWASs?
title_full eXclusionarY: 10 years later, where are the sex chromosomes in GWASs?
title_fullStr eXclusionarY: 10 years later, where are the sex chromosomes in GWASs?
title_full_unstemmed eXclusionarY: 10 years later, where are the sex chromosomes in GWASs?
title_short eXclusionarY: 10 years later, where are the sex chromosomes in GWASs?
title_sort exclusionary: 10 years later, where are the sex chromosomes in gwass?
topic Technology Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10257007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37267899
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2023.04.009
work_keys_str_mv AT sunlei exclusionary10yearslaterwherearethesexchromosomesingwass
AT wangzhong exclusionary10yearslaterwherearethesexchromosomesingwass
AT lutianyuan exclusionary10yearslaterwherearethesexchromosomesingwass
AT manolioteria exclusionary10yearslaterwherearethesexchromosomesingwass
AT patersonandrewd exclusionary10yearslaterwherearethesexchromosomesingwass