Cargando…

Validation of the accident and emergency experience questionnaire: a cross-sectional survey

BACKGROUND: Patient feedback is an important way for healthcare providers to understand patient experience and improve the quality of care effectively and facilitate patient-centered care in the healthcare system. This study aimed to suggest a validated instrument by evaluating the psychometric prop...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wong, Eliza Lai-Yi, Cheung, Annie Wai-Ling, Qiu, Hong, Ma, Jonathan Chun-Hei, Yeoh, Eng-Kiong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10257268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37296403
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09560-y
_version_ 1785057268406943744
author Wong, Eliza Lai-Yi
Cheung, Annie Wai-Ling
Qiu, Hong
Ma, Jonathan Chun-Hei
Yeoh, Eng-Kiong
author_facet Wong, Eliza Lai-Yi
Cheung, Annie Wai-Ling
Qiu, Hong
Ma, Jonathan Chun-Hei
Yeoh, Eng-Kiong
author_sort Wong, Eliza Lai-Yi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patient feedback is an important way for healthcare providers to understand patient experience and improve the quality of care effectively and facilitate patient-centered care in the healthcare system. This study aimed to suggest a validated instrument by evaluating the psychometric properties of the Accident and Emergency Experience Questionnaire (AEEQ) for measuring patient experience in the accident and emergency department (AED) service among the adult Chinese population. METHODS: Attendances aged 18 or above from all public hospitals with AEDs during 16–30 June 2016 were targeted and a cross-sectional telephone survey was conducted using AEEQ. Preliminary AEEQ consisted of 92 items, including 53 core evaluative items and 19 informative items, and the other 20 items covered socio-demographics, self-perceived health status, and free open-ended comments on AED service. Psychometric properties of the evaluative items were evaluated for practicability, content and structure validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability in this study. RESULTS: A total of 512 patients were recruited with a response rate of 54% and a mean age of 53.2 years old. The exploratory factor analysis suggested removing 7 items due to weak factor loadings and high cross-loading and then leaving 46 items grouped into 5 dimensions, which were care and treatment (14 items), environment and facilities (16 items), information on medication and danger signals (5 items), clinical investigation (3 items), and overall impression (8 items) to represent patient experience on AED service. The internal consistency and test-retest reliability were high with Cronbach’s alpha coefficient and Spearman’s correlation coefficient of the suggested scale of 0.845 and 0.838, respectively. CONCLUSION: The AEEQ is a valid and reliable instrument to evaluate the AED service which helps to build the engagement platform for promoting patient-centered care between patients and frontline healthcare professionals and improving healthcare quality in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10257268
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102572682023-06-11 Validation of the accident and emergency experience questionnaire: a cross-sectional survey Wong, Eliza Lai-Yi Cheung, Annie Wai-Ling Qiu, Hong Ma, Jonathan Chun-Hei Yeoh, Eng-Kiong BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: Patient feedback is an important way for healthcare providers to understand patient experience and improve the quality of care effectively and facilitate patient-centered care in the healthcare system. This study aimed to suggest a validated instrument by evaluating the psychometric properties of the Accident and Emergency Experience Questionnaire (AEEQ) for measuring patient experience in the accident and emergency department (AED) service among the adult Chinese population. METHODS: Attendances aged 18 or above from all public hospitals with AEDs during 16–30 June 2016 were targeted and a cross-sectional telephone survey was conducted using AEEQ. Preliminary AEEQ consisted of 92 items, including 53 core evaluative items and 19 informative items, and the other 20 items covered socio-demographics, self-perceived health status, and free open-ended comments on AED service. Psychometric properties of the evaluative items were evaluated for practicability, content and structure validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability in this study. RESULTS: A total of 512 patients were recruited with a response rate of 54% and a mean age of 53.2 years old. The exploratory factor analysis suggested removing 7 items due to weak factor loadings and high cross-loading and then leaving 46 items grouped into 5 dimensions, which were care and treatment (14 items), environment and facilities (16 items), information on medication and danger signals (5 items), clinical investigation (3 items), and overall impression (8 items) to represent patient experience on AED service. The internal consistency and test-retest reliability were high with Cronbach’s alpha coefficient and Spearman’s correlation coefficient of the suggested scale of 0.845 and 0.838, respectively. CONCLUSION: The AEEQ is a valid and reliable instrument to evaluate the AED service which helps to build the engagement platform for promoting patient-centered care between patients and frontline healthcare professionals and improving healthcare quality in the future. BioMed Central 2023-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10257268/ /pubmed/37296403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09560-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Wong, Eliza Lai-Yi
Cheung, Annie Wai-Ling
Qiu, Hong
Ma, Jonathan Chun-Hei
Yeoh, Eng-Kiong
Validation of the accident and emergency experience questionnaire: a cross-sectional survey
title Validation of the accident and emergency experience questionnaire: a cross-sectional survey
title_full Validation of the accident and emergency experience questionnaire: a cross-sectional survey
title_fullStr Validation of the accident and emergency experience questionnaire: a cross-sectional survey
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the accident and emergency experience questionnaire: a cross-sectional survey
title_short Validation of the accident and emergency experience questionnaire: a cross-sectional survey
title_sort validation of the accident and emergency experience questionnaire: a cross-sectional survey
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10257268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37296403
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09560-y
work_keys_str_mv AT wongelizalaiyi validationoftheaccidentandemergencyexperiencequestionnaireacrosssectionalsurvey
AT cheunganniewailing validationoftheaccidentandemergencyexperiencequestionnaireacrosssectionalsurvey
AT qiuhong validationoftheaccidentandemergencyexperiencequestionnaireacrosssectionalsurvey
AT majonathanchunhei validationoftheaccidentandemergencyexperiencequestionnaireacrosssectionalsurvey
AT yeohengkiong validationoftheaccidentandemergencyexperiencequestionnaireacrosssectionalsurvey