Cargando…
The value of a specialized second-opinion pathological diagnosis for oral and maxillofacial lesions
OBJECTIVES: An error in the diagnosis of an oral or maxillofacial lesion could potentially be detrimental to a patient’s prognosis and management. Major discrepancies between the initial and subsequent diagnoses of head and neck pathologies range from 7 to 53%. This study determined the rate of disc...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10257276/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37296405 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03085-w |
_version_ | 1785057269902213120 |
---|---|
author | Binmadi, Nada O. Alhindi, Areej A. Alsharif, Maha T. Jamal, Basem T. Mair, Yasmin H. |
author_facet | Binmadi, Nada O. Alhindi, Areej A. Alsharif, Maha T. Jamal, Basem T. Mair, Yasmin H. |
author_sort | Binmadi, Nada O. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: An error in the diagnosis of an oral or maxillofacial lesion could potentially be detrimental to a patient’s prognosis and management. Major discrepancies between the initial and subsequent diagnoses of head and neck pathologies range from 7 to 53%. This study determined the rate of discrepancies found in the diagnoses of oral and maxillofacial lesions after a second opinion in Saudi Arabia. METHODS: A retrospective single-center study was conducted by oral and maxillofacial pathology consultants to review all cases referred for a second opinion to the oral and maxillofacial pathology laboratory between January 2015 and December 2020. If the second-opinion diagnosis matched the original diagnosis, this was described as “agreement.” If the second-opinion diagnosis did not match the original diagnosis but would not change the management or prognosis of a patient, this was classified as a “minor disagreement.” If the second-opinion diagnosis resulted in the changing of a patient’s management or prognosis, this was categorized as a “major disagreement.” Chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test were used to compare data between original and second-opinion diagnoses. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Of 138 cases, 59 (43%) had an initial diagnosis and a second-opinion diagnosis that were in major disagreement. The most common tumor for which there was a major disagreement was squamous cell carcinoma. No single factor influenced the occurrence of major disagreements. CONCLUSIONS: Our evaluation reiterates the importance of obtaining a second opinion from a specialist in oral and maxillofacial pathology to improve the diagnostic accuracy for lesions. A formal system for this step, in addition to the obtaining of adequate clinical and radiographic information about a patient, is mandatory for the review of difficult cases. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at10.1186/s12903-023-03085-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10257276 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102572762023-06-11 The value of a specialized second-opinion pathological diagnosis for oral and maxillofacial lesions Binmadi, Nada O. Alhindi, Areej A. Alsharif, Maha T. Jamal, Basem T. Mair, Yasmin H. BMC Oral Health Research OBJECTIVES: An error in the diagnosis of an oral or maxillofacial lesion could potentially be detrimental to a patient’s prognosis and management. Major discrepancies between the initial and subsequent diagnoses of head and neck pathologies range from 7 to 53%. This study determined the rate of discrepancies found in the diagnoses of oral and maxillofacial lesions after a second opinion in Saudi Arabia. METHODS: A retrospective single-center study was conducted by oral and maxillofacial pathology consultants to review all cases referred for a second opinion to the oral and maxillofacial pathology laboratory between January 2015 and December 2020. If the second-opinion diagnosis matched the original diagnosis, this was described as “agreement.” If the second-opinion diagnosis did not match the original diagnosis but would not change the management or prognosis of a patient, this was classified as a “minor disagreement.” If the second-opinion diagnosis resulted in the changing of a patient’s management or prognosis, this was categorized as a “major disagreement.” Chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test were used to compare data between original and second-opinion diagnoses. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Of 138 cases, 59 (43%) had an initial diagnosis and a second-opinion diagnosis that were in major disagreement. The most common tumor for which there was a major disagreement was squamous cell carcinoma. No single factor influenced the occurrence of major disagreements. CONCLUSIONS: Our evaluation reiterates the importance of obtaining a second opinion from a specialist in oral and maxillofacial pathology to improve the diagnostic accuracy for lesions. A formal system for this step, in addition to the obtaining of adequate clinical and radiographic information about a patient, is mandatory for the review of difficult cases. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at10.1186/s12903-023-03085-w. BioMed Central 2023-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10257276/ /pubmed/37296405 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03085-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Binmadi, Nada O. Alhindi, Areej A. Alsharif, Maha T. Jamal, Basem T. Mair, Yasmin H. The value of a specialized second-opinion pathological diagnosis for oral and maxillofacial lesions |
title | The value of a specialized second-opinion pathological diagnosis for oral and maxillofacial lesions |
title_full | The value of a specialized second-opinion pathological diagnosis for oral and maxillofacial lesions |
title_fullStr | The value of a specialized second-opinion pathological diagnosis for oral and maxillofacial lesions |
title_full_unstemmed | The value of a specialized second-opinion pathological diagnosis for oral and maxillofacial lesions |
title_short | The value of a specialized second-opinion pathological diagnosis for oral and maxillofacial lesions |
title_sort | value of a specialized second-opinion pathological diagnosis for oral and maxillofacial lesions |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10257276/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37296405 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03085-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT binmadinadao thevalueofaspecializedsecondopinionpathologicaldiagnosisfororalandmaxillofaciallesions AT alhindiareeja thevalueofaspecializedsecondopinionpathologicaldiagnosisfororalandmaxillofaciallesions AT alsharifmahat thevalueofaspecializedsecondopinionpathologicaldiagnosisfororalandmaxillofaciallesions AT jamalbasemt thevalueofaspecializedsecondopinionpathologicaldiagnosisfororalandmaxillofaciallesions AT mairyasminh thevalueofaspecializedsecondopinionpathologicaldiagnosisfororalandmaxillofaciallesions AT binmadinadao valueofaspecializedsecondopinionpathologicaldiagnosisfororalandmaxillofaciallesions AT alhindiareeja valueofaspecializedsecondopinionpathologicaldiagnosisfororalandmaxillofaciallesions AT alsharifmahat valueofaspecializedsecondopinionpathologicaldiagnosisfororalandmaxillofaciallesions AT jamalbasemt valueofaspecializedsecondopinionpathologicaldiagnosisfororalandmaxillofaciallesions AT mairyasminh valueofaspecializedsecondopinionpathologicaldiagnosisfororalandmaxillofaciallesions |