Cargando…

The value of a specialized second-opinion pathological diagnosis for oral and maxillofacial lesions

OBJECTIVES: An error in the diagnosis of an oral or maxillofacial lesion could potentially be detrimental to a patient’s prognosis and management. Major discrepancies between the initial and subsequent diagnoses of head and neck pathologies range from 7 to 53%. This study determined the rate of disc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Binmadi, Nada O., Alhindi, Areej A., Alsharif, Maha T., Jamal, Basem T., Mair, Yasmin H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10257276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37296405
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03085-w
_version_ 1785057269902213120
author Binmadi, Nada O.
Alhindi, Areej A.
Alsharif, Maha T.
Jamal, Basem T.
Mair, Yasmin H.
author_facet Binmadi, Nada O.
Alhindi, Areej A.
Alsharif, Maha T.
Jamal, Basem T.
Mair, Yasmin H.
author_sort Binmadi, Nada O.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: An error in the diagnosis of an oral or maxillofacial lesion could potentially be detrimental to a patient’s prognosis and management. Major discrepancies between the initial and subsequent diagnoses of head and neck pathologies range from 7 to 53%. This study determined the rate of discrepancies found in the diagnoses of oral and maxillofacial lesions after a second opinion in Saudi Arabia. METHODS: A retrospective single-center study was conducted by oral and maxillofacial pathology consultants to review all cases referred for a second opinion to the oral and maxillofacial pathology laboratory between January 2015 and December 2020. If the second-opinion diagnosis matched the original diagnosis, this was described as “agreement.” If the second-opinion diagnosis did not match the original diagnosis but would not change the management or prognosis of a patient, this was classified as a “minor disagreement.” If the second-opinion diagnosis resulted in the changing of a patient’s management or prognosis, this was categorized as a “major disagreement.” Chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test were used to compare data between original and second-opinion diagnoses. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Of 138 cases, 59 (43%) had an initial diagnosis and a second-opinion diagnosis that were in major disagreement. The most common tumor for which there was a major disagreement was squamous cell carcinoma. No single factor influenced the occurrence of major disagreements. CONCLUSIONS: Our evaluation reiterates the importance of obtaining a second opinion from a specialist in oral and maxillofacial pathology to improve the diagnostic accuracy for lesions. A formal system for this step, in addition to the obtaining of adequate clinical and radiographic information about a patient, is mandatory for the review of difficult cases. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at10.1186/s12903-023-03085-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10257276
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102572762023-06-11 The value of a specialized second-opinion pathological diagnosis for oral and maxillofacial lesions Binmadi, Nada O. Alhindi, Areej A. Alsharif, Maha T. Jamal, Basem T. Mair, Yasmin H. BMC Oral Health Research OBJECTIVES: An error in the diagnosis of an oral or maxillofacial lesion could potentially be detrimental to a patient’s prognosis and management. Major discrepancies between the initial and subsequent diagnoses of head and neck pathologies range from 7 to 53%. This study determined the rate of discrepancies found in the diagnoses of oral and maxillofacial lesions after a second opinion in Saudi Arabia. METHODS: A retrospective single-center study was conducted by oral and maxillofacial pathology consultants to review all cases referred for a second opinion to the oral and maxillofacial pathology laboratory between January 2015 and December 2020. If the second-opinion diagnosis matched the original diagnosis, this was described as “agreement.” If the second-opinion diagnosis did not match the original diagnosis but would not change the management or prognosis of a patient, this was classified as a “minor disagreement.” If the second-opinion diagnosis resulted in the changing of a patient’s management or prognosis, this was categorized as a “major disagreement.” Chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test were used to compare data between original and second-opinion diagnoses. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Of 138 cases, 59 (43%) had an initial diagnosis and a second-opinion diagnosis that were in major disagreement. The most common tumor for which there was a major disagreement was squamous cell carcinoma. No single factor influenced the occurrence of major disagreements. CONCLUSIONS: Our evaluation reiterates the importance of obtaining a second opinion from a specialist in oral and maxillofacial pathology to improve the diagnostic accuracy for lesions. A formal system for this step, in addition to the obtaining of adequate clinical and radiographic information about a patient, is mandatory for the review of difficult cases. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at10.1186/s12903-023-03085-w. BioMed Central 2023-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10257276/ /pubmed/37296405 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03085-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Binmadi, Nada O.
Alhindi, Areej A.
Alsharif, Maha T.
Jamal, Basem T.
Mair, Yasmin H.
The value of a specialized second-opinion pathological diagnosis for oral and maxillofacial lesions
title The value of a specialized second-opinion pathological diagnosis for oral and maxillofacial lesions
title_full The value of a specialized second-opinion pathological diagnosis for oral and maxillofacial lesions
title_fullStr The value of a specialized second-opinion pathological diagnosis for oral and maxillofacial lesions
title_full_unstemmed The value of a specialized second-opinion pathological diagnosis for oral and maxillofacial lesions
title_short The value of a specialized second-opinion pathological diagnosis for oral and maxillofacial lesions
title_sort value of a specialized second-opinion pathological diagnosis for oral and maxillofacial lesions
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10257276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37296405
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03085-w
work_keys_str_mv AT binmadinadao thevalueofaspecializedsecondopinionpathologicaldiagnosisfororalandmaxillofaciallesions
AT alhindiareeja thevalueofaspecializedsecondopinionpathologicaldiagnosisfororalandmaxillofaciallesions
AT alsharifmahat thevalueofaspecializedsecondopinionpathologicaldiagnosisfororalandmaxillofaciallesions
AT jamalbasemt thevalueofaspecializedsecondopinionpathologicaldiagnosisfororalandmaxillofaciallesions
AT mairyasminh thevalueofaspecializedsecondopinionpathologicaldiagnosisfororalandmaxillofaciallesions
AT binmadinadao valueofaspecializedsecondopinionpathologicaldiagnosisfororalandmaxillofaciallesions
AT alhindiareeja valueofaspecializedsecondopinionpathologicaldiagnosisfororalandmaxillofaciallesions
AT alsharifmahat valueofaspecializedsecondopinionpathologicaldiagnosisfororalandmaxillofaciallesions
AT jamalbasemt valueofaspecializedsecondopinionpathologicaldiagnosisfororalandmaxillofaciallesions
AT mairyasminh valueofaspecializedsecondopinionpathologicaldiagnosisfororalandmaxillofaciallesions