Cargando…

Heart rate responses in critical care trainees during airway intubation: a comparison between the simulated and clinical environments

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the heart rate response to stress during airway intubations in clinical practice and a simulated environment. METHODS: Twenty-five critical care registrars participated in the study over a 3-month period. Heart rate data during intubations was recorded by a Fit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ji, Jackson, Langley, Bridget, Zordan, Rachel, van Dijk, Julian, Thies, Heidi Helene Graham, Brahmbhatt, Anjalee, Torcasio, Clarissa, Cunningham, Neil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10257286/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37301951
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-023-00832-8
_version_ 1785057271457251328
author Ji, Jackson
Langley, Bridget
Zordan, Rachel
van Dijk, Julian
Thies, Heidi Helene Graham
Brahmbhatt, Anjalee
Torcasio, Clarissa
Cunningham, Neil
author_facet Ji, Jackson
Langley, Bridget
Zordan, Rachel
van Dijk, Julian
Thies, Heidi Helene Graham
Brahmbhatt, Anjalee
Torcasio, Clarissa
Cunningham, Neil
author_sort Ji, Jackson
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the heart rate response to stress during airway intubations in clinical practice and a simulated environment. METHODS: Twenty-five critical care registrars participated in the study over a 3-month period. Heart rate data during intubations was recorded by a FitBit® Charge 2 worn by each participant during their clinical practice, and during a single simulated airway management scenario. The heart rate range was calculated by subtracting the baseline working heart rate (BWHR) from the maximum functional heart rate (MFHR). For each airway intubation performed participants recorded an airway diary entry. Data from intubations performed in the clinical environment was compared to data from a simulated environment. Heart rate changes were observed in two ways: percentage rise (median) across the 20-min intubation period and; percentage rise at point of intubation (median). RESULTS: Eighteen critical care registrars completed the study, mean age 31.8 years (SD = 2.015, 95% CI = 30.85–32.71). Throughout the 20-min peri-intubation recording period there was no significant difference in the median change in heart rates between the clinical (14.72%) and simulation (15.96%) environment (p = 0.149). At the point of intubation there was no significant difference in the median change in heart rate between the clinical (16.03%) and the simulation (25.65%) environment groups (p = 0.054). CONCLUSION: In this small population of critical care trainees, a simulation scenario induced a comparable heart rate response to the clinical environment during intubation. This provides evidence that simulation scenarios are able to induce a comparable physiological stress response to the clinical environment and thus facilitates effective teaching of a high-risk procedure in a safe manner. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12873-023-00832-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10257286
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102572862023-06-11 Heart rate responses in critical care trainees during airway intubation: a comparison between the simulated and clinical environments Ji, Jackson Langley, Bridget Zordan, Rachel van Dijk, Julian Thies, Heidi Helene Graham Brahmbhatt, Anjalee Torcasio, Clarissa Cunningham, Neil BMC Emerg Med Research OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the heart rate response to stress during airway intubations in clinical practice and a simulated environment. METHODS: Twenty-five critical care registrars participated in the study over a 3-month period. Heart rate data during intubations was recorded by a FitBit® Charge 2 worn by each participant during their clinical practice, and during a single simulated airway management scenario. The heart rate range was calculated by subtracting the baseline working heart rate (BWHR) from the maximum functional heart rate (MFHR). For each airway intubation performed participants recorded an airway diary entry. Data from intubations performed in the clinical environment was compared to data from a simulated environment. Heart rate changes were observed in two ways: percentage rise (median) across the 20-min intubation period and; percentage rise at point of intubation (median). RESULTS: Eighteen critical care registrars completed the study, mean age 31.8 years (SD = 2.015, 95% CI = 30.85–32.71). Throughout the 20-min peri-intubation recording period there was no significant difference in the median change in heart rates between the clinical (14.72%) and simulation (15.96%) environment (p = 0.149). At the point of intubation there was no significant difference in the median change in heart rate between the clinical (16.03%) and the simulation (25.65%) environment groups (p = 0.054). CONCLUSION: In this small population of critical care trainees, a simulation scenario induced a comparable heart rate response to the clinical environment during intubation. This provides evidence that simulation scenarios are able to induce a comparable physiological stress response to the clinical environment and thus facilitates effective teaching of a high-risk procedure in a safe manner. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12873-023-00832-8. BioMed Central 2023-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10257286/ /pubmed/37301951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-023-00832-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Ji, Jackson
Langley, Bridget
Zordan, Rachel
van Dijk, Julian
Thies, Heidi Helene Graham
Brahmbhatt, Anjalee
Torcasio, Clarissa
Cunningham, Neil
Heart rate responses in critical care trainees during airway intubation: a comparison between the simulated and clinical environments
title Heart rate responses in critical care trainees during airway intubation: a comparison between the simulated and clinical environments
title_full Heart rate responses in critical care trainees during airway intubation: a comparison between the simulated and clinical environments
title_fullStr Heart rate responses in critical care trainees during airway intubation: a comparison between the simulated and clinical environments
title_full_unstemmed Heart rate responses in critical care trainees during airway intubation: a comparison between the simulated and clinical environments
title_short Heart rate responses in critical care trainees during airway intubation: a comparison between the simulated and clinical environments
title_sort heart rate responses in critical care trainees during airway intubation: a comparison between the simulated and clinical environments
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10257286/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37301951
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-023-00832-8
work_keys_str_mv AT jijackson heartrateresponsesincriticalcaretraineesduringairwayintubationacomparisonbetweenthesimulatedandclinicalenvironments
AT langleybridget heartrateresponsesincriticalcaretraineesduringairwayintubationacomparisonbetweenthesimulatedandclinicalenvironments
AT zordanrachel heartrateresponsesincriticalcaretraineesduringairwayintubationacomparisonbetweenthesimulatedandclinicalenvironments
AT vandijkjulian heartrateresponsesincriticalcaretraineesduringairwayintubationacomparisonbetweenthesimulatedandclinicalenvironments
AT thiesheidihelenegraham heartrateresponsesincriticalcaretraineesduringairwayintubationacomparisonbetweenthesimulatedandclinicalenvironments
AT brahmbhattanjalee heartrateresponsesincriticalcaretraineesduringairwayintubationacomparisonbetweenthesimulatedandclinicalenvironments
AT torcasioclarissa heartrateresponsesincriticalcaretraineesduringairwayintubationacomparisonbetweenthesimulatedandclinicalenvironments
AT cunninghamneil heartrateresponsesincriticalcaretraineesduringairwayintubationacomparisonbetweenthesimulatedandclinicalenvironments