Cargando…
Heart rate responses in critical care trainees during airway intubation: a comparison between the simulated and clinical environments
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the heart rate response to stress during airway intubations in clinical practice and a simulated environment. METHODS: Twenty-five critical care registrars participated in the study over a 3-month period. Heart rate data during intubations was recorded by a Fit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10257286/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37301951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-023-00832-8 |
_version_ | 1785057271457251328 |
---|---|
author | Ji, Jackson Langley, Bridget Zordan, Rachel van Dijk, Julian Thies, Heidi Helene Graham Brahmbhatt, Anjalee Torcasio, Clarissa Cunningham, Neil |
author_facet | Ji, Jackson Langley, Bridget Zordan, Rachel van Dijk, Julian Thies, Heidi Helene Graham Brahmbhatt, Anjalee Torcasio, Clarissa Cunningham, Neil |
author_sort | Ji, Jackson |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the heart rate response to stress during airway intubations in clinical practice and a simulated environment. METHODS: Twenty-five critical care registrars participated in the study over a 3-month period. Heart rate data during intubations was recorded by a FitBit® Charge 2 worn by each participant during their clinical practice, and during a single simulated airway management scenario. The heart rate range was calculated by subtracting the baseline working heart rate (BWHR) from the maximum functional heart rate (MFHR). For each airway intubation performed participants recorded an airway diary entry. Data from intubations performed in the clinical environment was compared to data from a simulated environment. Heart rate changes were observed in two ways: percentage rise (median) across the 20-min intubation period and; percentage rise at point of intubation (median). RESULTS: Eighteen critical care registrars completed the study, mean age 31.8 years (SD = 2.015, 95% CI = 30.85–32.71). Throughout the 20-min peri-intubation recording period there was no significant difference in the median change in heart rates between the clinical (14.72%) and simulation (15.96%) environment (p = 0.149). At the point of intubation there was no significant difference in the median change in heart rate between the clinical (16.03%) and the simulation (25.65%) environment groups (p = 0.054). CONCLUSION: In this small population of critical care trainees, a simulation scenario induced a comparable heart rate response to the clinical environment during intubation. This provides evidence that simulation scenarios are able to induce a comparable physiological stress response to the clinical environment and thus facilitates effective teaching of a high-risk procedure in a safe manner. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12873-023-00832-8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10257286 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102572862023-06-11 Heart rate responses in critical care trainees during airway intubation: a comparison between the simulated and clinical environments Ji, Jackson Langley, Bridget Zordan, Rachel van Dijk, Julian Thies, Heidi Helene Graham Brahmbhatt, Anjalee Torcasio, Clarissa Cunningham, Neil BMC Emerg Med Research OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the heart rate response to stress during airway intubations in clinical practice and a simulated environment. METHODS: Twenty-five critical care registrars participated in the study over a 3-month period. Heart rate data during intubations was recorded by a FitBit® Charge 2 worn by each participant during their clinical practice, and during a single simulated airway management scenario. The heart rate range was calculated by subtracting the baseline working heart rate (BWHR) from the maximum functional heart rate (MFHR). For each airway intubation performed participants recorded an airway diary entry. Data from intubations performed in the clinical environment was compared to data from a simulated environment. Heart rate changes were observed in two ways: percentage rise (median) across the 20-min intubation period and; percentage rise at point of intubation (median). RESULTS: Eighteen critical care registrars completed the study, mean age 31.8 years (SD = 2.015, 95% CI = 30.85–32.71). Throughout the 20-min peri-intubation recording period there was no significant difference in the median change in heart rates between the clinical (14.72%) and simulation (15.96%) environment (p = 0.149). At the point of intubation there was no significant difference in the median change in heart rate between the clinical (16.03%) and the simulation (25.65%) environment groups (p = 0.054). CONCLUSION: In this small population of critical care trainees, a simulation scenario induced a comparable heart rate response to the clinical environment during intubation. This provides evidence that simulation scenarios are able to induce a comparable physiological stress response to the clinical environment and thus facilitates effective teaching of a high-risk procedure in a safe manner. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12873-023-00832-8. BioMed Central 2023-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10257286/ /pubmed/37301951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-023-00832-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Ji, Jackson Langley, Bridget Zordan, Rachel van Dijk, Julian Thies, Heidi Helene Graham Brahmbhatt, Anjalee Torcasio, Clarissa Cunningham, Neil Heart rate responses in critical care trainees during airway intubation: a comparison between the simulated and clinical environments |
title | Heart rate responses in critical care trainees during airway intubation: a comparison between the simulated and clinical environments |
title_full | Heart rate responses in critical care trainees during airway intubation: a comparison between the simulated and clinical environments |
title_fullStr | Heart rate responses in critical care trainees during airway intubation: a comparison between the simulated and clinical environments |
title_full_unstemmed | Heart rate responses in critical care trainees during airway intubation: a comparison between the simulated and clinical environments |
title_short | Heart rate responses in critical care trainees during airway intubation: a comparison between the simulated and clinical environments |
title_sort | heart rate responses in critical care trainees during airway intubation: a comparison between the simulated and clinical environments |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10257286/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37301951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-023-00832-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jijackson heartrateresponsesincriticalcaretraineesduringairwayintubationacomparisonbetweenthesimulatedandclinicalenvironments AT langleybridget heartrateresponsesincriticalcaretraineesduringairwayintubationacomparisonbetweenthesimulatedandclinicalenvironments AT zordanrachel heartrateresponsesincriticalcaretraineesduringairwayintubationacomparisonbetweenthesimulatedandclinicalenvironments AT vandijkjulian heartrateresponsesincriticalcaretraineesduringairwayintubationacomparisonbetweenthesimulatedandclinicalenvironments AT thiesheidihelenegraham heartrateresponsesincriticalcaretraineesduringairwayintubationacomparisonbetweenthesimulatedandclinicalenvironments AT brahmbhattanjalee heartrateresponsesincriticalcaretraineesduringairwayintubationacomparisonbetweenthesimulatedandclinicalenvironments AT torcasioclarissa heartrateresponsesincriticalcaretraineesduringairwayintubationacomparisonbetweenthesimulatedandclinicalenvironments AT cunninghamneil heartrateresponsesincriticalcaretraineesduringairwayintubationacomparisonbetweenthesimulatedandclinicalenvironments |