Cargando…

Studying the association between longitudinal mammographic density measurements and breast cancer risk: a joint modelling approach

BACKGROUND: Researchers have suggested that longitudinal trajectories of mammographic breast density (MD) can be used to understand changes in breast cancer (BC) risk over a woman’s lifetime. Some have suggested, based on biological arguments, that the cumulative trajectory of MD encapsulates the ri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Illipse, Maya, Czene, Kamila, Hall, Per, Humphreys, Keith
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10257295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37296473
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-023-01667-8
_version_ 1785057273640386560
author Illipse, Maya
Czene, Kamila
Hall, Per
Humphreys, Keith
author_facet Illipse, Maya
Czene, Kamila
Hall, Per
Humphreys, Keith
author_sort Illipse, Maya
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Researchers have suggested that longitudinal trajectories of mammographic breast density (MD) can be used to understand changes in breast cancer (BC) risk over a woman’s lifetime. Some have suggested, based on biological arguments, that the cumulative trajectory of MD encapsulates the risk of BC across time. Others have tried to connect changes in MD to the risk of BC. METHODS: To summarize the MD–BC association, we jointly model longitudinal trajectories of MD and time to diagnosis using data from a large ([Formula: see text] ) mammography cohort of Swedish women aged 40–80 years. Five hundred eighteen women were diagnosed with BC during follow-up. We fitted three joint models (JMs) with different association structures; Cumulative, current value and slope, and current value association structures. RESULTS: All models showed evidence of an association between MD trajectory and BC risk ([Formula: see text] for current value of MD, [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] for current value and slope of MD respectively, and [Formula: see text] for cumulative value of MD). Models with cumulative association structure and with current value and slope association structure had better goodness of fit than a model based only on current value. The JM with current value and slope structure suggested that a decrease in MD may be associated with an increased (instantaneous) BC risk. It is possible that this is because of increased screening sensitivity rather than being related to biology. CONCLUSION: We argue that a JM with a cumulative association structure may be the most appropriate/biologically relevant model in this context.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10257295
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102572952023-06-11 Studying the association between longitudinal mammographic density measurements and breast cancer risk: a joint modelling approach Illipse, Maya Czene, Kamila Hall, Per Humphreys, Keith Breast Cancer Res Research BACKGROUND: Researchers have suggested that longitudinal trajectories of mammographic breast density (MD) can be used to understand changes in breast cancer (BC) risk over a woman’s lifetime. Some have suggested, based on biological arguments, that the cumulative trajectory of MD encapsulates the risk of BC across time. Others have tried to connect changes in MD to the risk of BC. METHODS: To summarize the MD–BC association, we jointly model longitudinal trajectories of MD and time to diagnosis using data from a large ([Formula: see text] ) mammography cohort of Swedish women aged 40–80 years. Five hundred eighteen women were diagnosed with BC during follow-up. We fitted three joint models (JMs) with different association structures; Cumulative, current value and slope, and current value association structures. RESULTS: All models showed evidence of an association between MD trajectory and BC risk ([Formula: see text] for current value of MD, [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] for current value and slope of MD respectively, and [Formula: see text] for cumulative value of MD). Models with cumulative association structure and with current value and slope association structure had better goodness of fit than a model based only on current value. The JM with current value and slope structure suggested that a decrease in MD may be associated with an increased (instantaneous) BC risk. It is possible that this is because of increased screening sensitivity rather than being related to biology. CONCLUSION: We argue that a JM with a cumulative association structure may be the most appropriate/biologically relevant model in this context. BioMed Central 2023-06-09 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10257295/ /pubmed/37296473 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-023-01667-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Illipse, Maya
Czene, Kamila
Hall, Per
Humphreys, Keith
Studying the association between longitudinal mammographic density measurements and breast cancer risk: a joint modelling approach
title Studying the association between longitudinal mammographic density measurements and breast cancer risk: a joint modelling approach
title_full Studying the association between longitudinal mammographic density measurements and breast cancer risk: a joint modelling approach
title_fullStr Studying the association between longitudinal mammographic density measurements and breast cancer risk: a joint modelling approach
title_full_unstemmed Studying the association between longitudinal mammographic density measurements and breast cancer risk: a joint modelling approach
title_short Studying the association between longitudinal mammographic density measurements and breast cancer risk: a joint modelling approach
title_sort studying the association between longitudinal mammographic density measurements and breast cancer risk: a joint modelling approach
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10257295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37296473
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-023-01667-8
work_keys_str_mv AT illipsemaya studyingtheassociationbetweenlongitudinalmammographicdensitymeasurementsandbreastcancerriskajointmodellingapproach
AT czenekamila studyingtheassociationbetweenlongitudinalmammographicdensitymeasurementsandbreastcancerriskajointmodellingapproach
AT hallper studyingtheassociationbetweenlongitudinalmammographicdensitymeasurementsandbreastcancerriskajointmodellingapproach
AT humphreyskeith studyingtheassociationbetweenlongitudinalmammographicdensitymeasurementsandbreastcancerriskajointmodellingapproach