Cargando…

A single-center experience of over 300 cases of single-incision robotic cholecystectomy comparing the da Vinci SP with the Si/Xi systems

Minimally invasive surgery is usually more beneficial than open surgeries in various fields of surgery. With the newly developed Single-Port (SP) robotic surgical system, even single-site surgery has become easier to access. We compared single-incision robotic cholecystectomy between the Si/Xi and S...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choi, Yoo Jin, Sang, Nguyen Thanh, Jo, Hye-Sung, Kim, Dong-Sik, Yu, Young-Dong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10257706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37301853
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36055-x
_version_ 1785057356504104960
author Choi, Yoo Jin
Sang, Nguyen Thanh
Jo, Hye-Sung
Kim, Dong-Sik
Yu, Young-Dong
author_facet Choi, Yoo Jin
Sang, Nguyen Thanh
Jo, Hye-Sung
Kim, Dong-Sik
Yu, Young-Dong
author_sort Choi, Yoo Jin
collection PubMed
description Minimally invasive surgery is usually more beneficial than open surgeries in various fields of surgery. With the newly developed Single-Port (SP) robotic surgical system, even single-site surgery has become easier to access. We compared single-incision robotic cholecystectomy between the Si/Xi and SP systems. This retrospective single-center study enrolled patients who underwent single-incision robotic cholecystectomy between July 2014 and July 2021. The clinical outcomes of the da Vinci Si/Xi and SP systems were compared. In total, 334 patients underwent single-incision robotic cholecystectomy (118 Si/Xi vs. 216 SP). The SP group had more chronic or acute cholecystitis than the Si/Xi group did. There was more bile spillage in the Si/Xi group during the surgery. The total operative and docking times were significantly shorter in the SP group. There was no difference in the postoperative outcomes. The SP system is safe and feasible regarding comparable postoperative complication rates and is more convenient regarding docking and techniques.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10257706
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102577062023-06-12 A single-center experience of over 300 cases of single-incision robotic cholecystectomy comparing the da Vinci SP with the Si/Xi systems Choi, Yoo Jin Sang, Nguyen Thanh Jo, Hye-Sung Kim, Dong-Sik Yu, Young-Dong Sci Rep Article Minimally invasive surgery is usually more beneficial than open surgeries in various fields of surgery. With the newly developed Single-Port (SP) robotic surgical system, even single-site surgery has become easier to access. We compared single-incision robotic cholecystectomy between the Si/Xi and SP systems. This retrospective single-center study enrolled patients who underwent single-incision robotic cholecystectomy between July 2014 and July 2021. The clinical outcomes of the da Vinci Si/Xi and SP systems were compared. In total, 334 patients underwent single-incision robotic cholecystectomy (118 Si/Xi vs. 216 SP). The SP group had more chronic or acute cholecystitis than the Si/Xi group did. There was more bile spillage in the Si/Xi group during the surgery. The total operative and docking times were significantly shorter in the SP group. There was no difference in the postoperative outcomes. The SP system is safe and feasible regarding comparable postoperative complication rates and is more convenient regarding docking and techniques. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10257706/ /pubmed/37301853 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36055-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Choi, Yoo Jin
Sang, Nguyen Thanh
Jo, Hye-Sung
Kim, Dong-Sik
Yu, Young-Dong
A single-center experience of over 300 cases of single-incision robotic cholecystectomy comparing the da Vinci SP with the Si/Xi systems
title A single-center experience of over 300 cases of single-incision robotic cholecystectomy comparing the da Vinci SP with the Si/Xi systems
title_full A single-center experience of over 300 cases of single-incision robotic cholecystectomy comparing the da Vinci SP with the Si/Xi systems
title_fullStr A single-center experience of over 300 cases of single-incision robotic cholecystectomy comparing the da Vinci SP with the Si/Xi systems
title_full_unstemmed A single-center experience of over 300 cases of single-incision robotic cholecystectomy comparing the da Vinci SP with the Si/Xi systems
title_short A single-center experience of over 300 cases of single-incision robotic cholecystectomy comparing the da Vinci SP with the Si/Xi systems
title_sort single-center experience of over 300 cases of single-incision robotic cholecystectomy comparing the da vinci sp with the si/xi systems
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10257706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37301853
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36055-x
work_keys_str_mv AT choiyoojin asinglecenterexperienceofover300casesofsingleincisionroboticcholecystectomycomparingthedavincispwiththesixisystems
AT sangnguyenthanh asinglecenterexperienceofover300casesofsingleincisionroboticcholecystectomycomparingthedavincispwiththesixisystems
AT johyesung asinglecenterexperienceofover300casesofsingleincisionroboticcholecystectomycomparingthedavincispwiththesixisystems
AT kimdongsik asinglecenterexperienceofover300casesofsingleincisionroboticcholecystectomycomparingthedavincispwiththesixisystems
AT yuyoungdong asinglecenterexperienceofover300casesofsingleincisionroboticcholecystectomycomparingthedavincispwiththesixisystems
AT choiyoojin singlecenterexperienceofover300casesofsingleincisionroboticcholecystectomycomparingthedavincispwiththesixisystems
AT sangnguyenthanh singlecenterexperienceofover300casesofsingleincisionroboticcholecystectomycomparingthedavincispwiththesixisystems
AT johyesung singlecenterexperienceofover300casesofsingleincisionroboticcholecystectomycomparingthedavincispwiththesixisystems
AT kimdongsik singlecenterexperienceofover300casesofsingleincisionroboticcholecystectomycomparingthedavincispwiththesixisystems
AT yuyoungdong singlecenterexperienceofover300casesofsingleincisionroboticcholecystectomycomparingthedavincispwiththesixisystems