Cargando…
A single-center experience of over 300 cases of single-incision robotic cholecystectomy comparing the da Vinci SP with the Si/Xi systems
Minimally invasive surgery is usually more beneficial than open surgeries in various fields of surgery. With the newly developed Single-Port (SP) robotic surgical system, even single-site surgery has become easier to access. We compared single-incision robotic cholecystectomy between the Si/Xi and S...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10257706/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37301853 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36055-x |
_version_ | 1785057356504104960 |
---|---|
author | Choi, Yoo Jin Sang, Nguyen Thanh Jo, Hye-Sung Kim, Dong-Sik Yu, Young-Dong |
author_facet | Choi, Yoo Jin Sang, Nguyen Thanh Jo, Hye-Sung Kim, Dong-Sik Yu, Young-Dong |
author_sort | Choi, Yoo Jin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Minimally invasive surgery is usually more beneficial than open surgeries in various fields of surgery. With the newly developed Single-Port (SP) robotic surgical system, even single-site surgery has become easier to access. We compared single-incision robotic cholecystectomy between the Si/Xi and SP systems. This retrospective single-center study enrolled patients who underwent single-incision robotic cholecystectomy between July 2014 and July 2021. The clinical outcomes of the da Vinci Si/Xi and SP systems were compared. In total, 334 patients underwent single-incision robotic cholecystectomy (118 Si/Xi vs. 216 SP). The SP group had more chronic or acute cholecystitis than the Si/Xi group did. There was more bile spillage in the Si/Xi group during the surgery. The total operative and docking times were significantly shorter in the SP group. There was no difference in the postoperative outcomes. The SP system is safe and feasible regarding comparable postoperative complication rates and is more convenient regarding docking and techniques. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10257706 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102577062023-06-12 A single-center experience of over 300 cases of single-incision robotic cholecystectomy comparing the da Vinci SP with the Si/Xi systems Choi, Yoo Jin Sang, Nguyen Thanh Jo, Hye-Sung Kim, Dong-Sik Yu, Young-Dong Sci Rep Article Minimally invasive surgery is usually more beneficial than open surgeries in various fields of surgery. With the newly developed Single-Port (SP) robotic surgical system, even single-site surgery has become easier to access. We compared single-incision robotic cholecystectomy between the Si/Xi and SP systems. This retrospective single-center study enrolled patients who underwent single-incision robotic cholecystectomy between July 2014 and July 2021. The clinical outcomes of the da Vinci Si/Xi and SP systems were compared. In total, 334 patients underwent single-incision robotic cholecystectomy (118 Si/Xi vs. 216 SP). The SP group had more chronic or acute cholecystitis than the Si/Xi group did. There was more bile spillage in the Si/Xi group during the surgery. The total operative and docking times were significantly shorter in the SP group. There was no difference in the postoperative outcomes. The SP system is safe and feasible regarding comparable postoperative complication rates and is more convenient regarding docking and techniques. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10257706/ /pubmed/37301853 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36055-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Choi, Yoo Jin Sang, Nguyen Thanh Jo, Hye-Sung Kim, Dong-Sik Yu, Young-Dong A single-center experience of over 300 cases of single-incision robotic cholecystectomy comparing the da Vinci SP with the Si/Xi systems |
title | A single-center experience of over 300 cases of single-incision robotic cholecystectomy comparing the da Vinci SP with the Si/Xi systems |
title_full | A single-center experience of over 300 cases of single-incision robotic cholecystectomy comparing the da Vinci SP with the Si/Xi systems |
title_fullStr | A single-center experience of over 300 cases of single-incision robotic cholecystectomy comparing the da Vinci SP with the Si/Xi systems |
title_full_unstemmed | A single-center experience of over 300 cases of single-incision robotic cholecystectomy comparing the da Vinci SP with the Si/Xi systems |
title_short | A single-center experience of over 300 cases of single-incision robotic cholecystectomy comparing the da Vinci SP with the Si/Xi systems |
title_sort | single-center experience of over 300 cases of single-incision robotic cholecystectomy comparing the da vinci sp with the si/xi systems |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10257706/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37301853 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36055-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT choiyoojin asinglecenterexperienceofover300casesofsingleincisionroboticcholecystectomycomparingthedavincispwiththesixisystems AT sangnguyenthanh asinglecenterexperienceofover300casesofsingleincisionroboticcholecystectomycomparingthedavincispwiththesixisystems AT johyesung asinglecenterexperienceofover300casesofsingleincisionroboticcholecystectomycomparingthedavincispwiththesixisystems AT kimdongsik asinglecenterexperienceofover300casesofsingleincisionroboticcholecystectomycomparingthedavincispwiththesixisystems AT yuyoungdong asinglecenterexperienceofover300casesofsingleincisionroboticcholecystectomycomparingthedavincispwiththesixisystems AT choiyoojin singlecenterexperienceofover300casesofsingleincisionroboticcholecystectomycomparingthedavincispwiththesixisystems AT sangnguyenthanh singlecenterexperienceofover300casesofsingleincisionroboticcholecystectomycomparingthedavincispwiththesixisystems AT johyesung singlecenterexperienceofover300casesofsingleincisionroboticcholecystectomycomparingthedavincispwiththesixisystems AT kimdongsik singlecenterexperienceofover300casesofsingleincisionroboticcholecystectomycomparingthedavincispwiththesixisystems AT yuyoungdong singlecenterexperienceofover300casesofsingleincisionroboticcholecystectomycomparingthedavincispwiththesixisystems |