Cargando…

Laboratory performance of genome-wide cfDNA for copy number variants as compared to prenatal microarray

BACKGROUND: Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) allows for screening of fetal aneuploidy and copy number variants (CNVs) from cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in maternal plasma. Professional societies have not yet embraced NIPT for fetal CNVs, citing a need for additional performance data. A clinically availa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soster, Erica, Tynan, John, Gibbons, Clare, Meschino, Wendy, Wardrop, Jenna, Almasri, Eyad, Schwartz, Stuart, McLennan, Graham
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10257834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37301962
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13039-023-00642-4
_version_ 1785057373529833472
author Soster, Erica
Tynan, John
Gibbons, Clare
Meschino, Wendy
Wardrop, Jenna
Almasri, Eyad
Schwartz, Stuart
McLennan, Graham
author_facet Soster, Erica
Tynan, John
Gibbons, Clare
Meschino, Wendy
Wardrop, Jenna
Almasri, Eyad
Schwartz, Stuart
McLennan, Graham
author_sort Soster, Erica
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) allows for screening of fetal aneuploidy and copy number variants (CNVs) from cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in maternal plasma. Professional societies have not yet embraced NIPT for fetal CNVs, citing a need for additional performance data. A clinically available genome-wide cfDNA test screens for fetal aneuploidy and CNVs larger than 7 megabases (Mb). RESULTS: This study reviews 701 pregnancies with “high risk” indications for fetal aneuploidy which underwent both genome-wide cfDNA and prenatal microarray. For aneuploidies and CNVs considered ‘in-scope’ for the cfDNA test (CNVs ≥ 7 Mb and select microdeletions), sensitivity and specificity was 93.8% and 97.3% respectively, with positive and negative predictive values of 63.8% and 99.7% as compared to microarray. When including ‘out-of-scope’ CNVs on array as false negatives, the sensitivity of cfDNA falls to 48.3%. If only pathogenic out-of-scope CNVs are treated as false negatives, the sensitivity is 63.8%. Of the out-of-scope CNVs identified by array smaller than 7 Mb, 50% were classified as variants of uncertain significance (VUS), with an overall VUS rate in the study of 2.29%. CONCLUSIONS: While microarray provides the most robust assessment of fetal CNVs, this study suggests that genome-wide cfDNA can reliably screen for large CNVs in a high-risk cohort. Informed consent and adequate pretest counseling are essential to ensuring patients understand the benefits and limitations of all prenatal testing and screening options. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13039-023-00642-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10257834
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102578342023-06-12 Laboratory performance of genome-wide cfDNA for copy number variants as compared to prenatal microarray Soster, Erica Tynan, John Gibbons, Clare Meschino, Wendy Wardrop, Jenna Almasri, Eyad Schwartz, Stuart McLennan, Graham Mol Cytogenet Research BACKGROUND: Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) allows for screening of fetal aneuploidy and copy number variants (CNVs) from cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in maternal plasma. Professional societies have not yet embraced NIPT for fetal CNVs, citing a need for additional performance data. A clinically available genome-wide cfDNA test screens for fetal aneuploidy and CNVs larger than 7 megabases (Mb). RESULTS: This study reviews 701 pregnancies with “high risk” indications for fetal aneuploidy which underwent both genome-wide cfDNA and prenatal microarray. For aneuploidies and CNVs considered ‘in-scope’ for the cfDNA test (CNVs ≥ 7 Mb and select microdeletions), sensitivity and specificity was 93.8% and 97.3% respectively, with positive and negative predictive values of 63.8% and 99.7% as compared to microarray. When including ‘out-of-scope’ CNVs on array as false negatives, the sensitivity of cfDNA falls to 48.3%. If only pathogenic out-of-scope CNVs are treated as false negatives, the sensitivity is 63.8%. Of the out-of-scope CNVs identified by array smaller than 7 Mb, 50% were classified as variants of uncertain significance (VUS), with an overall VUS rate in the study of 2.29%. CONCLUSIONS: While microarray provides the most robust assessment of fetal CNVs, this study suggests that genome-wide cfDNA can reliably screen for large CNVs in a high-risk cohort. Informed consent and adequate pretest counseling are essential to ensuring patients understand the benefits and limitations of all prenatal testing and screening options. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13039-023-00642-4. BioMed Central 2023-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10257834/ /pubmed/37301962 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13039-023-00642-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Soster, Erica
Tynan, John
Gibbons, Clare
Meschino, Wendy
Wardrop, Jenna
Almasri, Eyad
Schwartz, Stuart
McLennan, Graham
Laboratory performance of genome-wide cfDNA for copy number variants as compared to prenatal microarray
title Laboratory performance of genome-wide cfDNA for copy number variants as compared to prenatal microarray
title_full Laboratory performance of genome-wide cfDNA for copy number variants as compared to prenatal microarray
title_fullStr Laboratory performance of genome-wide cfDNA for copy number variants as compared to prenatal microarray
title_full_unstemmed Laboratory performance of genome-wide cfDNA for copy number variants as compared to prenatal microarray
title_short Laboratory performance of genome-wide cfDNA for copy number variants as compared to prenatal microarray
title_sort laboratory performance of genome-wide cfdna for copy number variants as compared to prenatal microarray
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10257834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37301962
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13039-023-00642-4
work_keys_str_mv AT sostererica laboratoryperformanceofgenomewidecfdnaforcopynumbervariantsascomparedtoprenatalmicroarray
AT tynanjohn laboratoryperformanceofgenomewidecfdnaforcopynumbervariantsascomparedtoprenatalmicroarray
AT gibbonsclare laboratoryperformanceofgenomewidecfdnaforcopynumbervariantsascomparedtoprenatalmicroarray
AT meschinowendy laboratoryperformanceofgenomewidecfdnaforcopynumbervariantsascomparedtoprenatalmicroarray
AT wardropjenna laboratoryperformanceofgenomewidecfdnaforcopynumbervariantsascomparedtoprenatalmicroarray
AT almasrieyad laboratoryperformanceofgenomewidecfdnaforcopynumbervariantsascomparedtoprenatalmicroarray
AT schwartzstuart laboratoryperformanceofgenomewidecfdnaforcopynumbervariantsascomparedtoprenatalmicroarray
AT mclennangraham laboratoryperformanceofgenomewidecfdnaforcopynumbervariantsascomparedtoprenatalmicroarray