Cargando…

Machine learning and physical based modeling for cardiac hypertrophy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Predicting the long-term expansion and remodeling of the left ventricle in patients is challenging task but it has the potential to be clinically very useful. METHODS: In our study, we present machine learning models based on random forests, gradient boosting, and neural ne...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Milićević, Bogdan, Milošević, Miljan, Simić, Vladimir, Preveden, Andrej, Velicki, Lazar, Jakovljević, Đorđe, Bosnić, Zoran, Pičulin, Matej, Žunkovič, Bojan, Kojić, Miloš, Filipović, Nenad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10258386/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37313176
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16724
_version_ 1785057455171960832
author Milićević, Bogdan
Milošević, Miljan
Simić, Vladimir
Preveden, Andrej
Velicki, Lazar
Jakovljević, Đorđe
Bosnić, Zoran
Pičulin, Matej
Žunkovič, Bojan
Kojić, Miloš
Filipović, Nenad
author_facet Milićević, Bogdan
Milošević, Miljan
Simić, Vladimir
Preveden, Andrej
Velicki, Lazar
Jakovljević, Đorđe
Bosnić, Zoran
Pičulin, Matej
Žunkovič, Bojan
Kojić, Miloš
Filipović, Nenad
author_sort Milićević, Bogdan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Predicting the long-term expansion and remodeling of the left ventricle in patients is challenging task but it has the potential to be clinically very useful. METHODS: In our study, we present machine learning models based on random forests, gradient boosting, and neural networks, used to track cardiac hypertrophy. We collected data from multiple patients, and then the model was trained using the patient's medical history and present level of cardiac health. We also demonstrate a physical-based model, using the finite element procedure to simulate the development of cardiac hypertrophy. RESULTS: Our models were used to forecast the evolution of hypertrophy over six years. The machine learning model and finite element model provided similar results. CONCLUSIONS: The finite element model is much slower, but it's more accurate compared to the machine learning model since it's based on physical laws guiding the hypertrophy process. On the other hand, the machine learning model is fast but the results can be less trustworthy in some cases. Both of our models, enable us to monitor the development of the disease. Because of its speed machine learning model is more likely to be used in clinical practice. Further improvements to our machine learning model could be achieved by collecting data from finite element simulations, adding them to the dataset, and retraining the model. This can result in a fast and more accurate model combining the advantages of physical-based and machine learning modeling.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10258386
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102583862023-06-13 Machine learning and physical based modeling for cardiac hypertrophy Milićević, Bogdan Milošević, Miljan Simić, Vladimir Preveden, Andrej Velicki, Lazar Jakovljević, Đorđe Bosnić, Zoran Pičulin, Matej Žunkovič, Bojan Kojić, Miloš Filipović, Nenad Heliyon Research Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Predicting the long-term expansion and remodeling of the left ventricle in patients is challenging task but it has the potential to be clinically very useful. METHODS: In our study, we present machine learning models based on random forests, gradient boosting, and neural networks, used to track cardiac hypertrophy. We collected data from multiple patients, and then the model was trained using the patient's medical history and present level of cardiac health. We also demonstrate a physical-based model, using the finite element procedure to simulate the development of cardiac hypertrophy. RESULTS: Our models were used to forecast the evolution of hypertrophy over six years. The machine learning model and finite element model provided similar results. CONCLUSIONS: The finite element model is much slower, but it's more accurate compared to the machine learning model since it's based on physical laws guiding the hypertrophy process. On the other hand, the machine learning model is fast but the results can be less trustworthy in some cases. Both of our models, enable us to monitor the development of the disease. Because of its speed machine learning model is more likely to be used in clinical practice. Further improvements to our machine learning model could be achieved by collecting data from finite element simulations, adding them to the dataset, and retraining the model. This can result in a fast and more accurate model combining the advantages of physical-based and machine learning modeling. Elsevier 2023-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10258386/ /pubmed/37313176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16724 Text en © 2023 Published by Elsevier Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Milićević, Bogdan
Milošević, Miljan
Simić, Vladimir
Preveden, Andrej
Velicki, Lazar
Jakovljević, Đorđe
Bosnić, Zoran
Pičulin, Matej
Žunkovič, Bojan
Kojić, Miloš
Filipović, Nenad
Machine learning and physical based modeling for cardiac hypertrophy
title Machine learning and physical based modeling for cardiac hypertrophy
title_full Machine learning and physical based modeling for cardiac hypertrophy
title_fullStr Machine learning and physical based modeling for cardiac hypertrophy
title_full_unstemmed Machine learning and physical based modeling for cardiac hypertrophy
title_short Machine learning and physical based modeling for cardiac hypertrophy
title_sort machine learning and physical based modeling for cardiac hypertrophy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10258386/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37313176
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16724
work_keys_str_mv AT milicevicbogdan machinelearningandphysicalbasedmodelingforcardiachypertrophy
AT milosevicmiljan machinelearningandphysicalbasedmodelingforcardiachypertrophy
AT simicvladimir machinelearningandphysicalbasedmodelingforcardiachypertrophy
AT prevedenandrej machinelearningandphysicalbasedmodelingforcardiachypertrophy
AT velickilazar machinelearningandphysicalbasedmodelingforcardiachypertrophy
AT jakovljevicđorđe machinelearningandphysicalbasedmodelingforcardiachypertrophy
AT bosniczoran machinelearningandphysicalbasedmodelingforcardiachypertrophy
AT piculinmatej machinelearningandphysicalbasedmodelingforcardiachypertrophy
AT zunkovicbojan machinelearningandphysicalbasedmodelingforcardiachypertrophy
AT kojicmilos machinelearningandphysicalbasedmodelingforcardiachypertrophy
AT filipovicnenad machinelearningandphysicalbasedmodelingforcardiachypertrophy