Cargando…
Machine learning and physical based modeling for cardiac hypertrophy
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Predicting the long-term expansion and remodeling of the left ventricle in patients is challenging task but it has the potential to be clinically very useful. METHODS: In our study, we present machine learning models based on random forests, gradient boosting, and neural ne...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10258386/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37313176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16724 |
_version_ | 1785057455171960832 |
---|---|
author | Milićević, Bogdan Milošević, Miljan Simić, Vladimir Preveden, Andrej Velicki, Lazar Jakovljević, Đorđe Bosnić, Zoran Pičulin, Matej Žunkovič, Bojan Kojić, Miloš Filipović, Nenad |
author_facet | Milićević, Bogdan Milošević, Miljan Simić, Vladimir Preveden, Andrej Velicki, Lazar Jakovljević, Đorđe Bosnić, Zoran Pičulin, Matej Žunkovič, Bojan Kojić, Miloš Filipović, Nenad |
author_sort | Milićević, Bogdan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Predicting the long-term expansion and remodeling of the left ventricle in patients is challenging task but it has the potential to be clinically very useful. METHODS: In our study, we present machine learning models based on random forests, gradient boosting, and neural networks, used to track cardiac hypertrophy. We collected data from multiple patients, and then the model was trained using the patient's medical history and present level of cardiac health. We also demonstrate a physical-based model, using the finite element procedure to simulate the development of cardiac hypertrophy. RESULTS: Our models were used to forecast the evolution of hypertrophy over six years. The machine learning model and finite element model provided similar results. CONCLUSIONS: The finite element model is much slower, but it's more accurate compared to the machine learning model since it's based on physical laws guiding the hypertrophy process. On the other hand, the machine learning model is fast but the results can be less trustworthy in some cases. Both of our models, enable us to monitor the development of the disease. Because of its speed machine learning model is more likely to be used in clinical practice. Further improvements to our machine learning model could be achieved by collecting data from finite element simulations, adding them to the dataset, and retraining the model. This can result in a fast and more accurate model combining the advantages of physical-based and machine learning modeling. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10258386 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102583862023-06-13 Machine learning and physical based modeling for cardiac hypertrophy Milićević, Bogdan Milošević, Miljan Simić, Vladimir Preveden, Andrej Velicki, Lazar Jakovljević, Đorđe Bosnić, Zoran Pičulin, Matej Žunkovič, Bojan Kojić, Miloš Filipović, Nenad Heliyon Research Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Predicting the long-term expansion and remodeling of the left ventricle in patients is challenging task but it has the potential to be clinically very useful. METHODS: In our study, we present machine learning models based on random forests, gradient boosting, and neural networks, used to track cardiac hypertrophy. We collected data from multiple patients, and then the model was trained using the patient's medical history and present level of cardiac health. We also demonstrate a physical-based model, using the finite element procedure to simulate the development of cardiac hypertrophy. RESULTS: Our models were used to forecast the evolution of hypertrophy over six years. The machine learning model and finite element model provided similar results. CONCLUSIONS: The finite element model is much slower, but it's more accurate compared to the machine learning model since it's based on physical laws guiding the hypertrophy process. On the other hand, the machine learning model is fast but the results can be less trustworthy in some cases. Both of our models, enable us to monitor the development of the disease. Because of its speed machine learning model is more likely to be used in clinical practice. Further improvements to our machine learning model could be achieved by collecting data from finite element simulations, adding them to the dataset, and retraining the model. This can result in a fast and more accurate model combining the advantages of physical-based and machine learning modeling. Elsevier 2023-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10258386/ /pubmed/37313176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16724 Text en © 2023 Published by Elsevier Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Article Milićević, Bogdan Milošević, Miljan Simić, Vladimir Preveden, Andrej Velicki, Lazar Jakovljević, Đorđe Bosnić, Zoran Pičulin, Matej Žunkovič, Bojan Kojić, Miloš Filipović, Nenad Machine learning and physical based modeling for cardiac hypertrophy |
title | Machine learning and physical based modeling for cardiac hypertrophy |
title_full | Machine learning and physical based modeling for cardiac hypertrophy |
title_fullStr | Machine learning and physical based modeling for cardiac hypertrophy |
title_full_unstemmed | Machine learning and physical based modeling for cardiac hypertrophy |
title_short | Machine learning and physical based modeling for cardiac hypertrophy |
title_sort | machine learning and physical based modeling for cardiac hypertrophy |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10258386/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37313176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16724 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT milicevicbogdan machinelearningandphysicalbasedmodelingforcardiachypertrophy AT milosevicmiljan machinelearningandphysicalbasedmodelingforcardiachypertrophy AT simicvladimir machinelearningandphysicalbasedmodelingforcardiachypertrophy AT prevedenandrej machinelearningandphysicalbasedmodelingforcardiachypertrophy AT velickilazar machinelearningandphysicalbasedmodelingforcardiachypertrophy AT jakovljevicđorđe machinelearningandphysicalbasedmodelingforcardiachypertrophy AT bosniczoran machinelearningandphysicalbasedmodelingforcardiachypertrophy AT piculinmatej machinelearningandphysicalbasedmodelingforcardiachypertrophy AT zunkovicbojan machinelearningandphysicalbasedmodelingforcardiachypertrophy AT kojicmilos machinelearningandphysicalbasedmodelingforcardiachypertrophy AT filipovicnenad machinelearningandphysicalbasedmodelingforcardiachypertrophy |