Cargando…

Telenursing: The view of care professionals in selected EU countries. A pilot study

BACKGROUND: With the growth of digital nursing, several studies have focused on recording patients' views on remote care, or specialised nurse staffing aspects. This is the first international survey on telenursing focused exclusively on clinical nurses that analyses the dimensions of usefulnes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marco-Franco, Julio Emilio, Reis-Santos, Margarida, Barrachina-Martinez, Isabel, Jurewicz, Alina, Camaño-Puig, Ramón
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10258424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37313150
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16760
_version_ 1785057464205443072
author Marco-Franco, Julio Emilio
Reis-Santos, Margarida
Barrachina-Martinez, Isabel
Jurewicz, Alina
Camaño-Puig, Ramón
author_facet Marco-Franco, Julio Emilio
Reis-Santos, Margarida
Barrachina-Martinez, Isabel
Jurewicz, Alina
Camaño-Puig, Ramón
author_sort Marco-Franco, Julio Emilio
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: With the growth of digital nursing, several studies have focused on recording patients' views on remote care, or specialised nurse staffing aspects. This is the first international survey on telenursing focused exclusively on clinical nurses that analyses the dimensions of usefulness, acceptability, and appropriateness of telenursing from the staff point of view. METHODS: A previously validated structured questionnaire including demographic variables, 18 responses with a Likert-5 scale, three dichotomous questions, and one overall percentual estimation of holistic nursing care susceptible to being undertaken by telenursing, was administered (from 1 September to 30 November 2022) to 225 clinical and community nurses from three selected EU countries. Data analysis: descriptive data, classical and Rasch testing. RESULTS: The results show adequacy of the model for measurement of the domains of usefulness, acceptability, and appropriateness of telenursing (overall Cronbach's alpha 0.945, Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin 0.952 and Bartlett's p < 0.001). Answers in favour of telenursing ranked 4 out of 5 in Likert scale, both globally and by the three domains. Rasch: reliability coefficient 0.94, Warm's main weighted likelihood estimate reliability 0.95. In the ANOVA analysis, the results for Portugal were significantly higher than those for Spain and Poland, both overall and for each of the dimensions. Respondents with bachelor's, master's and doctoral degrees score significantly higher than those with certificates or diplomas. Multiple regression did not yield additional data of interest. CONCLUSIONS: The tested model proved to be valid, but although the majority of nurses are in favour of telenursing, given the nature of the care, which is mainly face-to-face, according to the respondents, the chances of carrying out their activities by telenursing is only 35.3%. The survey provides useful information on what can be expected from the implementation of telenursing and the questionnaire proves to be a useful tool to be applied in other countries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10258424
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102584242023-06-13 Telenursing: The view of care professionals in selected EU countries. A pilot study Marco-Franco, Julio Emilio Reis-Santos, Margarida Barrachina-Martinez, Isabel Jurewicz, Alina Camaño-Puig, Ramón Heliyon Research Article BACKGROUND: With the growth of digital nursing, several studies have focused on recording patients' views on remote care, or specialised nurse staffing aspects. This is the first international survey on telenursing focused exclusively on clinical nurses that analyses the dimensions of usefulness, acceptability, and appropriateness of telenursing from the staff point of view. METHODS: A previously validated structured questionnaire including demographic variables, 18 responses with a Likert-5 scale, three dichotomous questions, and one overall percentual estimation of holistic nursing care susceptible to being undertaken by telenursing, was administered (from 1 September to 30 November 2022) to 225 clinical and community nurses from three selected EU countries. Data analysis: descriptive data, classical and Rasch testing. RESULTS: The results show adequacy of the model for measurement of the domains of usefulness, acceptability, and appropriateness of telenursing (overall Cronbach's alpha 0.945, Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin 0.952 and Bartlett's p < 0.001). Answers in favour of telenursing ranked 4 out of 5 in Likert scale, both globally and by the three domains. Rasch: reliability coefficient 0.94, Warm's main weighted likelihood estimate reliability 0.95. In the ANOVA analysis, the results for Portugal were significantly higher than those for Spain and Poland, both overall and for each of the dimensions. Respondents with bachelor's, master's and doctoral degrees score significantly higher than those with certificates or diplomas. Multiple regression did not yield additional data of interest. CONCLUSIONS: The tested model proved to be valid, but although the majority of nurses are in favour of telenursing, given the nature of the care, which is mainly face-to-face, according to the respondents, the chances of carrying out their activities by telenursing is only 35.3%. The survey provides useful information on what can be expected from the implementation of telenursing and the questionnaire proves to be a useful tool to be applied in other countries. Elsevier 2023-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10258424/ /pubmed/37313150 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16760 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Marco-Franco, Julio Emilio
Reis-Santos, Margarida
Barrachina-Martinez, Isabel
Jurewicz, Alina
Camaño-Puig, Ramón
Telenursing: The view of care professionals in selected EU countries. A pilot study
title Telenursing: The view of care professionals in selected EU countries. A pilot study
title_full Telenursing: The view of care professionals in selected EU countries. A pilot study
title_fullStr Telenursing: The view of care professionals in selected EU countries. A pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Telenursing: The view of care professionals in selected EU countries. A pilot study
title_short Telenursing: The view of care professionals in selected EU countries. A pilot study
title_sort telenursing: the view of care professionals in selected eu countries. a pilot study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10258424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37313150
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16760
work_keys_str_mv AT marcofrancojulioemilio telenursingtheviewofcareprofessionalsinselectedeucountriesapilotstudy
AT reissantosmargarida telenursingtheviewofcareprofessionalsinselectedeucountriesapilotstudy
AT barrachinamartinezisabel telenursingtheviewofcareprofessionalsinselectedeucountriesapilotstudy
AT jurewiczalina telenursingtheviewofcareprofessionalsinselectedeucountriesapilotstudy
AT camanopuigramon telenursingtheviewofcareprofessionalsinselectedeucountriesapilotstudy