Cargando…
Mobile applications for cognitive training: Content analysis and quality review
BACKGROUND: As the number of individuals suffering from cognitive diseases continues to rise, dealing with the diminished cognitive function that comes with age has become a serious public health concern. While the use of mobile applications (apps) as digital treatments for cognitive training shows...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10258500/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37312799 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2023.100632 |
_version_ | 1785057479295500288 |
---|---|
author | Bang, Myeonghwan Jang, Chan Woong Kim, Hyoung Seop Park, Jung Hyun Cho, Han Eol |
author_facet | Bang, Myeonghwan Jang, Chan Woong Kim, Hyoung Seop Park, Jung Hyun Cho, Han Eol |
author_sort | Bang, Myeonghwan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: As the number of individuals suffering from cognitive diseases continues to rise, dealing with the diminished cognitive function that comes with age has become a serious public health concern. While the use of mobile applications (apps) as digital treatments for cognitive training shows promise, the analysis of their content and quality remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to systematically search and assess cognitive training apps using the multidimensional mobile app rating scale (MARS) to rate objective quality and identify critical points. METHODS: A search was conducted on the Google Play Store and Apple App Store in February 2022 using the terms “cognitive training” and “cognitive rehabilitation.” The cognitive domains provided by each app were analyzed, and the frequency and percentage according to the apps were obtained. The MARS, a mHealth app quality rating tool including multidimensional measures, was used to analyze the quality of the apps. The relationship between the MARS score, the number of reviews, and 5-star ratings were examined. RESULTS: Of the 53 apps, 52 (98 %) included memory function, 48 (91 %) included attention function, 24 (45 %) included executive function, and 19 (36 %) included visuospatial function. The mean (SD) scores of MARS, 5-star ratings, and reviews of 53 apps were 3.09 (0.61), 4.33 (0.30), and 62,415.43 (121,578.77). From the between-section comparison, engagement (mean 2.97, SD 0.68) obtained lower scores than functionality (mean 3.18, SD 0.62), aesthetics (mean 3.13, SD 0.72), and information (mean 3.11, SD 0.54). The mean quality score and reviews showed a statistically significant association (r = 0.447 and P = .001*). As the number of domains increased, the mean quality score showed a statistically significant increasing trend (P = .002*). CONCLUSIONS: Most apps provided training for the memory and attention domains, but few apps included executive function or visuospatial domains. The quality of the apps improved significantly when more domains were provided, and was positively associated with the number of reviews received. These results could be useful for the future development of mobile apps for cognitive training. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10258500 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102585002023-06-13 Mobile applications for cognitive training: Content analysis and quality review Bang, Myeonghwan Jang, Chan Woong Kim, Hyoung Seop Park, Jung Hyun Cho, Han Eol Internet Interv Full length Article BACKGROUND: As the number of individuals suffering from cognitive diseases continues to rise, dealing with the diminished cognitive function that comes with age has become a serious public health concern. While the use of mobile applications (apps) as digital treatments for cognitive training shows promise, the analysis of their content and quality remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to systematically search and assess cognitive training apps using the multidimensional mobile app rating scale (MARS) to rate objective quality and identify critical points. METHODS: A search was conducted on the Google Play Store and Apple App Store in February 2022 using the terms “cognitive training” and “cognitive rehabilitation.” The cognitive domains provided by each app were analyzed, and the frequency and percentage according to the apps were obtained. The MARS, a mHealth app quality rating tool including multidimensional measures, was used to analyze the quality of the apps. The relationship between the MARS score, the number of reviews, and 5-star ratings were examined. RESULTS: Of the 53 apps, 52 (98 %) included memory function, 48 (91 %) included attention function, 24 (45 %) included executive function, and 19 (36 %) included visuospatial function. The mean (SD) scores of MARS, 5-star ratings, and reviews of 53 apps were 3.09 (0.61), 4.33 (0.30), and 62,415.43 (121,578.77). From the between-section comparison, engagement (mean 2.97, SD 0.68) obtained lower scores than functionality (mean 3.18, SD 0.62), aesthetics (mean 3.13, SD 0.72), and information (mean 3.11, SD 0.54). The mean quality score and reviews showed a statistically significant association (r = 0.447 and P = .001*). As the number of domains increased, the mean quality score showed a statistically significant increasing trend (P = .002*). CONCLUSIONS: Most apps provided training for the memory and attention domains, but few apps included executive function or visuospatial domains. The quality of the apps improved significantly when more domains were provided, and was positively associated with the number of reviews received. These results could be useful for the future development of mobile apps for cognitive training. Elsevier 2023-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10258500/ /pubmed/37312799 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2023.100632 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Full length Article Bang, Myeonghwan Jang, Chan Woong Kim, Hyoung Seop Park, Jung Hyun Cho, Han Eol Mobile applications for cognitive training: Content analysis and quality review |
title | Mobile applications for cognitive training: Content analysis and quality review |
title_full | Mobile applications for cognitive training: Content analysis and quality review |
title_fullStr | Mobile applications for cognitive training: Content analysis and quality review |
title_full_unstemmed | Mobile applications for cognitive training: Content analysis and quality review |
title_short | Mobile applications for cognitive training: Content analysis and quality review |
title_sort | mobile applications for cognitive training: content analysis and quality review |
topic | Full length Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10258500/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37312799 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2023.100632 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bangmyeonghwan mobileapplicationsforcognitivetrainingcontentanalysisandqualityreview AT jangchanwoong mobileapplicationsforcognitivetrainingcontentanalysisandqualityreview AT kimhyoungseop mobileapplicationsforcognitivetrainingcontentanalysisandqualityreview AT parkjunghyun mobileapplicationsforcognitivetrainingcontentanalysisandqualityreview AT chohaneol mobileapplicationsforcognitivetrainingcontentanalysisandqualityreview |