Cargando…
The novel questionnaire assessing occupational exposure to the risk factors of contact allergy among health professionals
INTRODUCTION: Skin diseases account for about 7% of all occupational diseases in Europe. Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is one of the most common occupational skin diseases. Therefore, it constitutes the major health and economic problem. Increasing the detectability of ACD would significantly im...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Termedia Publishing House
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10258703/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37312904 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ada.2023.127645 |
_version_ | 1785057520646094848 |
---|---|
author | Drozdowska, Aneta Drozdowski, Piotr Jaworski, Aleksander P. Bula, Daniel Adamczyk, Dawid Reich, Adam |
author_facet | Drozdowska, Aneta Drozdowski, Piotr Jaworski, Aleksander P. Bula, Daniel Adamczyk, Dawid Reich, Adam |
author_sort | Drozdowska, Aneta |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Skin diseases account for about 7% of all occupational diseases in Europe. Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is one of the most common occupational skin diseases. Therefore, it constitutes the major health and economic problem. Increasing the detectability of ACD would significantly improve the quality of life of patients and their work efficiency. AIM: To design a questionnaire facilitating the diagnosis of ACD in work environment of healthcare providers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The initial questionnaire consisted of 53 questions related to ACD and exposure to various occupational hazards. On its basis, a scale of exposure to occupational skin diseases (OSDES-49) was created. The reliability of the scale was measured using the internal consistency test of the scale. It was assumed that individual items of the scale would be correlated with the total score if the Kleine and Nunnally criteria were met. RESULTS: The Kleine and Nunnally criteria were met by 16 out of 49 items on the scale. OSDES-49 results were strongly correlated with the assessment using a questionnaire consisting of only 16 items (OSDES-16). Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was rho = 0.850 and p < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: Results of the study showed that in any further screening tests, the OSDES-16 scale is reliable. The use of OSDES-16 reduces the time of initial diagnostics and simplifies it. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10258703 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Termedia Publishing House |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102587032023-06-13 The novel questionnaire assessing occupational exposure to the risk factors of contact allergy among health professionals Drozdowska, Aneta Drozdowski, Piotr Jaworski, Aleksander P. Bula, Daniel Adamczyk, Dawid Reich, Adam Postepy Dermatol Alergol Original Paper INTRODUCTION: Skin diseases account for about 7% of all occupational diseases in Europe. Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is one of the most common occupational skin diseases. Therefore, it constitutes the major health and economic problem. Increasing the detectability of ACD would significantly improve the quality of life of patients and their work efficiency. AIM: To design a questionnaire facilitating the diagnosis of ACD in work environment of healthcare providers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The initial questionnaire consisted of 53 questions related to ACD and exposure to various occupational hazards. On its basis, a scale of exposure to occupational skin diseases (OSDES-49) was created. The reliability of the scale was measured using the internal consistency test of the scale. It was assumed that individual items of the scale would be correlated with the total score if the Kleine and Nunnally criteria were met. RESULTS: The Kleine and Nunnally criteria were met by 16 out of 49 items on the scale. OSDES-49 results were strongly correlated with the assessment using a questionnaire consisting of only 16 items (OSDES-16). Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was rho = 0.850 and p < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: Results of the study showed that in any further screening tests, the OSDES-16 scale is reliable. The use of OSDES-16 reduces the time of initial diagnostics and simplifies it. Termedia Publishing House 2023-06-01 2023-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10258703/ /pubmed/37312904 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ada.2023.127645 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Termedia Sp. z o. o. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Drozdowska, Aneta Drozdowski, Piotr Jaworski, Aleksander P. Bula, Daniel Adamczyk, Dawid Reich, Adam The novel questionnaire assessing occupational exposure to the risk factors of contact allergy among health professionals |
title | The novel questionnaire assessing occupational exposure to the risk factors of contact allergy among health professionals |
title_full | The novel questionnaire assessing occupational exposure to the risk factors of contact allergy among health professionals |
title_fullStr | The novel questionnaire assessing occupational exposure to the risk factors of contact allergy among health professionals |
title_full_unstemmed | The novel questionnaire assessing occupational exposure to the risk factors of contact allergy among health professionals |
title_short | The novel questionnaire assessing occupational exposure to the risk factors of contact allergy among health professionals |
title_sort | novel questionnaire assessing occupational exposure to the risk factors of contact allergy among health professionals |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10258703/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37312904 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ada.2023.127645 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT drozdowskaaneta thenovelquestionnaireassessingoccupationalexposuretotheriskfactorsofcontactallergyamonghealthprofessionals AT drozdowskipiotr thenovelquestionnaireassessingoccupationalexposuretotheriskfactorsofcontactallergyamonghealthprofessionals AT jaworskialeksanderp thenovelquestionnaireassessingoccupationalexposuretotheriskfactorsofcontactallergyamonghealthprofessionals AT buladaniel thenovelquestionnaireassessingoccupationalexposuretotheriskfactorsofcontactallergyamonghealthprofessionals AT adamczykdawid thenovelquestionnaireassessingoccupationalexposuretotheriskfactorsofcontactallergyamonghealthprofessionals AT reichadam thenovelquestionnaireassessingoccupationalexposuretotheriskfactorsofcontactallergyamonghealthprofessionals AT drozdowskaaneta novelquestionnaireassessingoccupationalexposuretotheriskfactorsofcontactallergyamonghealthprofessionals AT drozdowskipiotr novelquestionnaireassessingoccupationalexposuretotheriskfactorsofcontactallergyamonghealthprofessionals AT jaworskialeksanderp novelquestionnaireassessingoccupationalexposuretotheriskfactorsofcontactallergyamonghealthprofessionals AT buladaniel novelquestionnaireassessingoccupationalexposuretotheriskfactorsofcontactallergyamonghealthprofessionals AT adamczykdawid novelquestionnaireassessingoccupationalexposuretotheriskfactorsofcontactallergyamonghealthprofessionals AT reichadam novelquestionnaireassessingoccupationalexposuretotheriskfactorsofcontactallergyamonghealthprofessionals |