Cargando…

The novel questionnaire assessing occupational exposure to the risk factors of contact allergy among health professionals

INTRODUCTION: Skin diseases account for about 7% of all occupational diseases in Europe. Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is one of the most common occupational skin diseases. Therefore, it constitutes the major health and economic problem. Increasing the detectability of ACD would significantly im...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Drozdowska, Aneta, Drozdowski, Piotr, Jaworski, Aleksander P., Bula, Daniel, Adamczyk, Dawid, Reich, Adam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10258703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37312904
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ada.2023.127645
_version_ 1785057520646094848
author Drozdowska, Aneta
Drozdowski, Piotr
Jaworski, Aleksander P.
Bula, Daniel
Adamczyk, Dawid
Reich, Adam
author_facet Drozdowska, Aneta
Drozdowski, Piotr
Jaworski, Aleksander P.
Bula, Daniel
Adamczyk, Dawid
Reich, Adam
author_sort Drozdowska, Aneta
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Skin diseases account for about 7% of all occupational diseases in Europe. Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is one of the most common occupational skin diseases. Therefore, it constitutes the major health and economic problem. Increasing the detectability of ACD would significantly improve the quality of life of patients and their work efficiency. AIM: To design a questionnaire facilitating the diagnosis of ACD in work environment of healthcare providers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The initial questionnaire consisted of 53 questions related to ACD and exposure to various occupational hazards. On its basis, a scale of exposure to occupational skin diseases (OSDES-49) was created. The reliability of the scale was measured using the internal consistency test of the scale. It was assumed that individual items of the scale would be correlated with the total score if the Kleine and Nunnally criteria were met. RESULTS: The Kleine and Nunnally criteria were met by 16 out of 49 items on the scale. OSDES-49 results were strongly correlated with the assessment using a questionnaire consisting of only 16 items (OSDES-16). Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was rho = 0.850 and p < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: Results of the study showed that in any further screening tests, the OSDES-16 scale is reliable. The use of OSDES-16 reduces the time of initial diagnostics and simplifies it.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10258703
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102587032023-06-13 The novel questionnaire assessing occupational exposure to the risk factors of contact allergy among health professionals Drozdowska, Aneta Drozdowski, Piotr Jaworski, Aleksander P. Bula, Daniel Adamczyk, Dawid Reich, Adam Postepy Dermatol Alergol Original Paper INTRODUCTION: Skin diseases account for about 7% of all occupational diseases in Europe. Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is one of the most common occupational skin diseases. Therefore, it constitutes the major health and economic problem. Increasing the detectability of ACD would significantly improve the quality of life of patients and their work efficiency. AIM: To design a questionnaire facilitating the diagnosis of ACD in work environment of healthcare providers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The initial questionnaire consisted of 53 questions related to ACD and exposure to various occupational hazards. On its basis, a scale of exposure to occupational skin diseases (OSDES-49) was created. The reliability of the scale was measured using the internal consistency test of the scale. It was assumed that individual items of the scale would be correlated with the total score if the Kleine and Nunnally criteria were met. RESULTS: The Kleine and Nunnally criteria were met by 16 out of 49 items on the scale. OSDES-49 results were strongly correlated with the assessment using a questionnaire consisting of only 16 items (OSDES-16). Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was rho = 0.850 and p < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: Results of the study showed that in any further screening tests, the OSDES-16 scale is reliable. The use of OSDES-16 reduces the time of initial diagnostics and simplifies it. Termedia Publishing House 2023-06-01 2023-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10258703/ /pubmed/37312904 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ada.2023.127645 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Termedia Sp. z o. o. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Drozdowska, Aneta
Drozdowski, Piotr
Jaworski, Aleksander P.
Bula, Daniel
Adamczyk, Dawid
Reich, Adam
The novel questionnaire assessing occupational exposure to the risk factors of contact allergy among health professionals
title The novel questionnaire assessing occupational exposure to the risk factors of contact allergy among health professionals
title_full The novel questionnaire assessing occupational exposure to the risk factors of contact allergy among health professionals
title_fullStr The novel questionnaire assessing occupational exposure to the risk factors of contact allergy among health professionals
title_full_unstemmed The novel questionnaire assessing occupational exposure to the risk factors of contact allergy among health professionals
title_short The novel questionnaire assessing occupational exposure to the risk factors of contact allergy among health professionals
title_sort novel questionnaire assessing occupational exposure to the risk factors of contact allergy among health professionals
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10258703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37312904
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ada.2023.127645
work_keys_str_mv AT drozdowskaaneta thenovelquestionnaireassessingoccupationalexposuretotheriskfactorsofcontactallergyamonghealthprofessionals
AT drozdowskipiotr thenovelquestionnaireassessingoccupationalexposuretotheriskfactorsofcontactallergyamonghealthprofessionals
AT jaworskialeksanderp thenovelquestionnaireassessingoccupationalexposuretotheriskfactorsofcontactallergyamonghealthprofessionals
AT buladaniel thenovelquestionnaireassessingoccupationalexposuretotheriskfactorsofcontactallergyamonghealthprofessionals
AT adamczykdawid thenovelquestionnaireassessingoccupationalexposuretotheriskfactorsofcontactallergyamonghealthprofessionals
AT reichadam thenovelquestionnaireassessingoccupationalexposuretotheriskfactorsofcontactallergyamonghealthprofessionals
AT drozdowskaaneta novelquestionnaireassessingoccupationalexposuretotheriskfactorsofcontactallergyamonghealthprofessionals
AT drozdowskipiotr novelquestionnaireassessingoccupationalexposuretotheriskfactorsofcontactallergyamonghealthprofessionals
AT jaworskialeksanderp novelquestionnaireassessingoccupationalexposuretotheriskfactorsofcontactallergyamonghealthprofessionals
AT buladaniel novelquestionnaireassessingoccupationalexposuretotheriskfactorsofcontactallergyamonghealthprofessionals
AT adamczykdawid novelquestionnaireassessingoccupationalexposuretotheriskfactorsofcontactallergyamonghealthprofessionals
AT reichadam novelquestionnaireassessingoccupationalexposuretotheriskfactorsofcontactallergyamonghealthprofessionals