Cargando…

Relationship between inferior mesenteric artery diameter and rectal cancer

INTRODUCTION: A dilated inferior mesenteric vein has been reported in rectal cancer patients. However, no study has yet reported inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) enlargement in rectal cancer. We aimed to assess the relationship between the IMA diameter and rectal cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patien...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chi, Feng, Zhou, Shenkang, Bi, Tienan, Zhao, Wenjun, Wang, Xiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10259405/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37313205
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms/112531
_version_ 1785057654708633600
author Chi, Feng
Zhou, Shenkang
Bi, Tienan
Zhao, Wenjun
Wang, Xiang
author_facet Chi, Feng
Zhou, Shenkang
Bi, Tienan
Zhao, Wenjun
Wang, Xiang
author_sort Chi, Feng
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: A dilated inferior mesenteric vein has been reported in rectal cancer patients. However, no study has yet reported inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) enlargement in rectal cancer. We aimed to assess the relationship between the IMA diameter and rectal cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients diagnosed with rectal cancer and a control group of 42 patients in our hospital from July 2017 to June 2019 were evaluated. The IMA diameter was independently measured by two observers on axial computed tomography images. RESULTS: The mean IMA diameter was wider in rectal cancer patients (2.49 ±0.53 mm) than in the control group (2.20 ±0.47 mm, p < 0.001). The IMA diameter of patients with stage I, stage II, stage III, and stage IV cancers was 2.24 ±0.36 mm, 2.45 ±0.39 mm, 2.80 ±0.55 mm, and 2.85 ±0.51 mm, respectively (p < 0.001). The IMA diameter correlated positively and moderately with TNM stage (r = 0.519, p < 0.001). The IMA diameter of patients with T1, T2, T3, and T4 tumors was 2.18 ±0.31 mm, 2.39 ±0.50 mm, 2.55 ±0.48 mm, and 2.73 ±0.51 mm, respectively (p < 0.001). The IMA diameter also correlated positively and moderately with T stage (r = 0.457, p < 0.001). The IMA diameter of patients with N0, N1, and N2 tumors was 2.37 ±0.39 mm, 2.83 ±0.60 mm, and 2.71 ±0.40 mm, respectively (p < 0.001); however, the IMA diameter did not correlate with N stage (r = 0.166, p = 0.077). Patients with M1 tumors had a wider IMA diameter than patients with M0 tumors (p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: The IMA in rectal cancer patients enlarges as the TNM stage gets higher. The IMA diameter can be accepted as a possibly important marker for the staging of rectal cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10259405
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102594052023-06-13 Relationship between inferior mesenteric artery diameter and rectal cancer Chi, Feng Zhou, Shenkang Bi, Tienan Zhao, Wenjun Wang, Xiang Arch Med Sci Clinical Research INTRODUCTION: A dilated inferior mesenteric vein has been reported in rectal cancer patients. However, no study has yet reported inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) enlargement in rectal cancer. We aimed to assess the relationship between the IMA diameter and rectal cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients diagnosed with rectal cancer and a control group of 42 patients in our hospital from July 2017 to June 2019 were evaluated. The IMA diameter was independently measured by two observers on axial computed tomography images. RESULTS: The mean IMA diameter was wider in rectal cancer patients (2.49 ±0.53 mm) than in the control group (2.20 ±0.47 mm, p < 0.001). The IMA diameter of patients with stage I, stage II, stage III, and stage IV cancers was 2.24 ±0.36 mm, 2.45 ±0.39 mm, 2.80 ±0.55 mm, and 2.85 ±0.51 mm, respectively (p < 0.001). The IMA diameter correlated positively and moderately with TNM stage (r = 0.519, p < 0.001). The IMA diameter of patients with T1, T2, T3, and T4 tumors was 2.18 ±0.31 mm, 2.39 ±0.50 mm, 2.55 ±0.48 mm, and 2.73 ±0.51 mm, respectively (p < 0.001). The IMA diameter also correlated positively and moderately with T stage (r = 0.457, p < 0.001). The IMA diameter of patients with N0, N1, and N2 tumors was 2.37 ±0.39 mm, 2.83 ±0.60 mm, and 2.71 ±0.40 mm, respectively (p < 0.001); however, the IMA diameter did not correlate with N stage (r = 0.166, p = 0.077). Patients with M1 tumors had a wider IMA diameter than patients with M0 tumors (p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: The IMA in rectal cancer patients enlarges as the TNM stage gets higher. The IMA diameter can be accepted as a possibly important marker for the staging of rectal cancer. Termedia Publishing House 2021-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10259405/ /pubmed/37313205 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms/112531 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Termedia & Banach https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Chi, Feng
Zhou, Shenkang
Bi, Tienan
Zhao, Wenjun
Wang, Xiang
Relationship between inferior mesenteric artery diameter and rectal cancer
title Relationship between inferior mesenteric artery diameter and rectal cancer
title_full Relationship between inferior mesenteric artery diameter and rectal cancer
title_fullStr Relationship between inferior mesenteric artery diameter and rectal cancer
title_full_unstemmed Relationship between inferior mesenteric artery diameter and rectal cancer
title_short Relationship between inferior mesenteric artery diameter and rectal cancer
title_sort relationship between inferior mesenteric artery diameter and rectal cancer
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10259405/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37313205
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms/112531
work_keys_str_mv AT chifeng relationshipbetweeninferiormesentericarterydiameterandrectalcancer
AT zhoushenkang relationshipbetweeninferiormesentericarterydiameterandrectalcancer
AT bitienan relationshipbetweeninferiormesentericarterydiameterandrectalcancer
AT zhaowenjun relationshipbetweeninferiormesentericarterydiameterandrectalcancer
AT wangxiang relationshipbetweeninferiormesentericarterydiameterandrectalcancer