Cargando…
Program management challenges of clinical studies: A qualitative critical assessment
BACKGROUND: Organization, coordination, and discipline are required to complete any intricate operation, conducting a clinical experiment is no different. There are usually many moving components, from designing a plan, to conveying changes, to calculating risk, and excellent project management whic...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10259540/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37312779 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1151_22 |
_version_ | 1785057682484363264 |
---|---|
author | Gupta, Girjesh Mahor, Rajendra Pawar, Neeraj Gumashta, Raghvendra Gumashta, Jyotsna |
author_facet | Gupta, Girjesh Mahor, Rajendra Pawar, Neeraj Gumashta, Raghvendra Gumashta, Jyotsna |
author_sort | Gupta, Girjesh |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Organization, coordination, and discipline are required to complete any intricate operation, conducting a clinical experiment is no different. There are usually many moving components, from designing a plan, to conveying changes, to calculating risk, and excellent project management which are necessary to guarantee the study works successfully. Past evidence suggested that roadblock at any level hampers the progress of the clinical research. Understanding program management challenges hence becomes the key for timely and effective completion of clinical research. METHODS: A cross-sectional qualitative enquiry involving stakeholders in clinical research program management. We used problem tree-based approach wherein we documented views of various stakeholders to understand the interaction, interdependence, and related interventional needs of bottlenecks for long-term research gains using modern management methods applicable in clinical settings. The best fit approach was also explored to augment maximum benefit in limited resource settings. RESULTS: Non-alignment with state policy aims, a lack of effective coordination and communication among members, challenging logistic management, limited use of technology, a need for training, and an inefficient monitoring mechanism were among the major issues highlighted, and solutions were proposed. CONCLUSION: Study concludes that an Integrated Process-cum-Timeline-Based Management strategy with multisectoral emphasis is ideal for program management of clinical projects. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10259540 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102595402023-06-13 Program management challenges of clinical studies: A qualitative critical assessment Gupta, Girjesh Mahor, Rajendra Pawar, Neeraj Gumashta, Raghvendra Gumashta, Jyotsna J Family Med Prim Care Original Article BACKGROUND: Organization, coordination, and discipline are required to complete any intricate operation, conducting a clinical experiment is no different. There are usually many moving components, from designing a plan, to conveying changes, to calculating risk, and excellent project management which are necessary to guarantee the study works successfully. Past evidence suggested that roadblock at any level hampers the progress of the clinical research. Understanding program management challenges hence becomes the key for timely and effective completion of clinical research. METHODS: A cross-sectional qualitative enquiry involving stakeholders in clinical research program management. We used problem tree-based approach wherein we documented views of various stakeholders to understand the interaction, interdependence, and related interventional needs of bottlenecks for long-term research gains using modern management methods applicable in clinical settings. The best fit approach was also explored to augment maximum benefit in limited resource settings. RESULTS: Non-alignment with state policy aims, a lack of effective coordination and communication among members, challenging logistic management, limited use of technology, a need for training, and an inefficient monitoring mechanism were among the major issues highlighted, and solutions were proposed. CONCLUSION: Study concludes that an Integrated Process-cum-Timeline-Based Management strategy with multisectoral emphasis is ideal for program management of clinical projects. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023-04 2023-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10259540/ /pubmed/37312779 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1151_22 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Gupta, Girjesh Mahor, Rajendra Pawar, Neeraj Gumashta, Raghvendra Gumashta, Jyotsna Program management challenges of clinical studies: A qualitative critical assessment |
title | Program management challenges of clinical studies: A qualitative critical assessment |
title_full | Program management challenges of clinical studies: A qualitative critical assessment |
title_fullStr | Program management challenges of clinical studies: A qualitative critical assessment |
title_full_unstemmed | Program management challenges of clinical studies: A qualitative critical assessment |
title_short | Program management challenges of clinical studies: A qualitative critical assessment |
title_sort | program management challenges of clinical studies: a qualitative critical assessment |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10259540/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37312779 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1151_22 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guptagirjesh programmanagementchallengesofclinicalstudiesaqualitativecriticalassessment AT mahorrajendra programmanagementchallengesofclinicalstudiesaqualitativecriticalassessment AT pawarneeraj programmanagementchallengesofclinicalstudiesaqualitativecriticalassessment AT gumashtaraghvendra programmanagementchallengesofclinicalstudiesaqualitativecriticalassessment AT gumashtajyotsna programmanagementchallengesofclinicalstudiesaqualitativecriticalassessment |