Cargando…
Increased Production of Abdominal Donor Site Fluid Following Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction With Superficial Inferior Epigastric Artery Versus Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flaps
Introduction and aims Donor site seroma following abdominal flap harvest for breast reconstruction is common in both deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) and superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flaps. We tested the hypothesis that there is increased donor site fluid following...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10259683/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37313097 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.38942 |
_version_ | 1785057710374387712 |
---|---|
author | Carslaw, Calum H Samudrala, Havish Kerrison, James Brooker, Jack E Rabey, Nicholas G Malata, Charles M |
author_facet | Carslaw, Calum H Samudrala, Havish Kerrison, James Brooker, Jack E Rabey, Nicholas G Malata, Charles M |
author_sort | Carslaw, Calum H |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction and aims Donor site seroma following abdominal flap harvest for breast reconstruction is common in both deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) and superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flaps. We tested the hypothesis that there is increased donor site fluid following SIEA dissection compared to DIEP. Materials and methods Of60 SIEA breast reconstructions performed by one surgeon in 50 patients (2004-2019), complete data were available for 31 patients. Eighteen unilateral SIEAs were matched with 18 unilateral DIEPs. Thirteen bilateral flap harvests involving an SIEA were matched with 13 bilateral DIEP controls. Their cumulative abdominal drain outputs, times to drain removal, hospital stay, and number and volume of seroma aspirations were compared. Results Patients who underwent an SIEA flap harvest had significantly increased drain output compared to only a DIEP flap harvest (SIEA=1,078 mL, DIEP=500 mL, p<0.001), which remained significant after controlling for confounding variables (p=0.002). There was increased time until drain removal (SIEA=11 days, DIEP=6 days, p=0.010), and patients who underwent an SIEA harvest were 14 times more likely to be discharged with a drain in situ (odds ratio (OR)=14.6, 95% confidence interval (CI)=2.8203-75.9565, p=0.0014). There was no significant difference in the number or volume of outpatient aspirations, length of hospital admission, or total seroma volume. Conclusion This study demonstrated that SIEA harvest is a significant predictor of increased abdominal drain output postoperatively. This accounted for longer periods before drain removal and more patients discharged with an abdominal drain in situ and should be an important consideration for reconstructive surgeons. There was no demonstrable difference in the number or volume of seroma aspirations after drain removal for either group. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10259683 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102596832023-06-13 Increased Production of Abdominal Donor Site Fluid Following Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction With Superficial Inferior Epigastric Artery Versus Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flaps Carslaw, Calum H Samudrala, Havish Kerrison, James Brooker, Jack E Rabey, Nicholas G Malata, Charles M Cureus Plastic Surgery Introduction and aims Donor site seroma following abdominal flap harvest for breast reconstruction is common in both deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) and superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flaps. We tested the hypothesis that there is increased donor site fluid following SIEA dissection compared to DIEP. Materials and methods Of60 SIEA breast reconstructions performed by one surgeon in 50 patients (2004-2019), complete data were available for 31 patients. Eighteen unilateral SIEAs were matched with 18 unilateral DIEPs. Thirteen bilateral flap harvests involving an SIEA were matched with 13 bilateral DIEP controls. Their cumulative abdominal drain outputs, times to drain removal, hospital stay, and number and volume of seroma aspirations were compared. Results Patients who underwent an SIEA flap harvest had significantly increased drain output compared to only a DIEP flap harvest (SIEA=1,078 mL, DIEP=500 mL, p<0.001), which remained significant after controlling for confounding variables (p=0.002). There was increased time until drain removal (SIEA=11 days, DIEP=6 days, p=0.010), and patients who underwent an SIEA harvest were 14 times more likely to be discharged with a drain in situ (odds ratio (OR)=14.6, 95% confidence interval (CI)=2.8203-75.9565, p=0.0014). There was no significant difference in the number or volume of outpatient aspirations, length of hospital admission, or total seroma volume. Conclusion This study demonstrated that SIEA harvest is a significant predictor of increased abdominal drain output postoperatively. This accounted for longer periods before drain removal and more patients discharged with an abdominal drain in situ and should be an important consideration for reconstructive surgeons. There was no demonstrable difference in the number or volume of seroma aspirations after drain removal for either group. Cureus 2023-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10259683/ /pubmed/37313097 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.38942 Text en Copyright © 2023, Carslaw et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Plastic Surgery Carslaw, Calum H Samudrala, Havish Kerrison, James Brooker, Jack E Rabey, Nicholas G Malata, Charles M Increased Production of Abdominal Donor Site Fluid Following Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction With Superficial Inferior Epigastric Artery Versus Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flaps |
title | Increased Production of Abdominal Donor Site Fluid Following Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction With Superficial Inferior Epigastric Artery Versus Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flaps |
title_full | Increased Production of Abdominal Donor Site Fluid Following Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction With Superficial Inferior Epigastric Artery Versus Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flaps |
title_fullStr | Increased Production of Abdominal Donor Site Fluid Following Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction With Superficial Inferior Epigastric Artery Versus Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flaps |
title_full_unstemmed | Increased Production of Abdominal Donor Site Fluid Following Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction With Superficial Inferior Epigastric Artery Versus Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flaps |
title_short | Increased Production of Abdominal Donor Site Fluid Following Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction With Superficial Inferior Epigastric Artery Versus Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flaps |
title_sort | increased production of abdominal donor site fluid following microsurgical breast reconstruction with superficial inferior epigastric artery versus deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flaps |
topic | Plastic Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10259683/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37313097 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.38942 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT carslawcalumh increasedproductionofabdominaldonorsitefluidfollowingmicrosurgicalbreastreconstructionwithsuperficialinferiorepigastricarteryversusdeepinferiorepigastricarteryperforatorflaps AT samudralahavish increasedproductionofabdominaldonorsitefluidfollowingmicrosurgicalbreastreconstructionwithsuperficialinferiorepigastricarteryversusdeepinferiorepigastricarteryperforatorflaps AT kerrisonjames increasedproductionofabdominaldonorsitefluidfollowingmicrosurgicalbreastreconstructionwithsuperficialinferiorepigastricarteryversusdeepinferiorepigastricarteryperforatorflaps AT brookerjacke increasedproductionofabdominaldonorsitefluidfollowingmicrosurgicalbreastreconstructionwithsuperficialinferiorepigastricarteryversusdeepinferiorepigastricarteryperforatorflaps AT rabeynicholasg increasedproductionofabdominaldonorsitefluidfollowingmicrosurgicalbreastreconstructionwithsuperficialinferiorepigastricarteryversusdeepinferiorepigastricarteryperforatorflaps AT malatacharlesm increasedproductionofabdominaldonorsitefluidfollowingmicrosurgicalbreastreconstructionwithsuperficialinferiorepigastricarteryversusdeepinferiorepigastricarteryperforatorflaps |