Cargando…

Increased Production of Abdominal Donor Site Fluid Following Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction With Superficial Inferior Epigastric Artery Versus Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flaps

Introduction and aims Donor site seroma following abdominal flap harvest for breast reconstruction is common in both deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) and superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flaps. We tested the hypothesis that there is increased donor site fluid following...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carslaw, Calum H, Samudrala, Havish, Kerrison, James, Brooker, Jack E, Rabey, Nicholas G, Malata, Charles M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10259683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37313097
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.38942
_version_ 1785057710374387712
author Carslaw, Calum H
Samudrala, Havish
Kerrison, James
Brooker, Jack E
Rabey, Nicholas G
Malata, Charles M
author_facet Carslaw, Calum H
Samudrala, Havish
Kerrison, James
Brooker, Jack E
Rabey, Nicholas G
Malata, Charles M
author_sort Carslaw, Calum H
collection PubMed
description Introduction and aims Donor site seroma following abdominal flap harvest for breast reconstruction is common in both deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) and superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flaps. We tested the hypothesis that there is increased donor site fluid following SIEA dissection compared to DIEP. Materials and methods Of60 SIEA breast reconstructions performed by one surgeon in 50 patients (2004-2019), complete data were available for 31 patients. Eighteen unilateral SIEAs were matched with 18 unilateral DIEPs. Thirteen bilateral flap harvests involving an SIEA were matched with 13 bilateral DIEP controls. Their cumulative abdominal drain outputs, times to drain removal, hospital stay, and number and volume of seroma aspirations were compared. Results Patients who underwent an SIEA flap harvest had significantly increased drain output compared to only a DIEP flap harvest (SIEA=1,078 mL, DIEP=500 mL, p<0.001), which remained significant after controlling for confounding variables (p=0.002). There was increased time until drain removal (SIEA=11 days, DIEP=6 days, p=0.010), and patients who underwent an SIEA harvest were 14 times more likely to be discharged with a drain in situ (odds ratio (OR)=14.6, 95% confidence interval (CI)=2.8203-75.9565, p=0.0014). There was no significant difference in the number or volume of outpatient aspirations, length of hospital admission, or total seroma volume. Conclusion This study demonstrated that SIEA harvest is a significant predictor of increased abdominal drain output postoperatively. This accounted for longer periods before drain removal and more patients discharged with an abdominal drain in situ and should be an important consideration for reconstructive surgeons. There was no demonstrable difference in the number or volume of seroma aspirations after drain removal for either group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10259683
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102596832023-06-13 Increased Production of Abdominal Donor Site Fluid Following Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction With Superficial Inferior Epigastric Artery Versus Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flaps Carslaw, Calum H Samudrala, Havish Kerrison, James Brooker, Jack E Rabey, Nicholas G Malata, Charles M Cureus Plastic Surgery Introduction and aims Donor site seroma following abdominal flap harvest for breast reconstruction is common in both deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) and superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flaps. We tested the hypothesis that there is increased donor site fluid following SIEA dissection compared to DIEP. Materials and methods Of60 SIEA breast reconstructions performed by one surgeon in 50 patients (2004-2019), complete data were available for 31 patients. Eighteen unilateral SIEAs were matched with 18 unilateral DIEPs. Thirteen bilateral flap harvests involving an SIEA were matched with 13 bilateral DIEP controls. Their cumulative abdominal drain outputs, times to drain removal, hospital stay, and number and volume of seroma aspirations were compared. Results Patients who underwent an SIEA flap harvest had significantly increased drain output compared to only a DIEP flap harvest (SIEA=1,078 mL, DIEP=500 mL, p<0.001), which remained significant after controlling for confounding variables (p=0.002). There was increased time until drain removal (SIEA=11 days, DIEP=6 days, p=0.010), and patients who underwent an SIEA harvest were 14 times more likely to be discharged with a drain in situ (odds ratio (OR)=14.6, 95% confidence interval (CI)=2.8203-75.9565, p=0.0014). There was no significant difference in the number or volume of outpatient aspirations, length of hospital admission, or total seroma volume. Conclusion This study demonstrated that SIEA harvest is a significant predictor of increased abdominal drain output postoperatively. This accounted for longer periods before drain removal and more patients discharged with an abdominal drain in situ and should be an important consideration for reconstructive surgeons. There was no demonstrable difference in the number or volume of seroma aspirations after drain removal for either group. Cureus 2023-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10259683/ /pubmed/37313097 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.38942 Text en Copyright © 2023, Carslaw et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Plastic Surgery
Carslaw, Calum H
Samudrala, Havish
Kerrison, James
Brooker, Jack E
Rabey, Nicholas G
Malata, Charles M
Increased Production of Abdominal Donor Site Fluid Following Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction With Superficial Inferior Epigastric Artery Versus Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flaps
title Increased Production of Abdominal Donor Site Fluid Following Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction With Superficial Inferior Epigastric Artery Versus Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flaps
title_full Increased Production of Abdominal Donor Site Fluid Following Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction With Superficial Inferior Epigastric Artery Versus Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flaps
title_fullStr Increased Production of Abdominal Donor Site Fluid Following Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction With Superficial Inferior Epigastric Artery Versus Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flaps
title_full_unstemmed Increased Production of Abdominal Donor Site Fluid Following Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction With Superficial Inferior Epigastric Artery Versus Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flaps
title_short Increased Production of Abdominal Donor Site Fluid Following Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction With Superficial Inferior Epigastric Artery Versus Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flaps
title_sort increased production of abdominal donor site fluid following microsurgical breast reconstruction with superficial inferior epigastric artery versus deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flaps
topic Plastic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10259683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37313097
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.38942
work_keys_str_mv AT carslawcalumh increasedproductionofabdominaldonorsitefluidfollowingmicrosurgicalbreastreconstructionwithsuperficialinferiorepigastricarteryversusdeepinferiorepigastricarteryperforatorflaps
AT samudralahavish increasedproductionofabdominaldonorsitefluidfollowingmicrosurgicalbreastreconstructionwithsuperficialinferiorepigastricarteryversusdeepinferiorepigastricarteryperforatorflaps
AT kerrisonjames increasedproductionofabdominaldonorsitefluidfollowingmicrosurgicalbreastreconstructionwithsuperficialinferiorepigastricarteryversusdeepinferiorepigastricarteryperforatorflaps
AT brookerjacke increasedproductionofabdominaldonorsitefluidfollowingmicrosurgicalbreastreconstructionwithsuperficialinferiorepigastricarteryversusdeepinferiorepigastricarteryperforatorflaps
AT rabeynicholasg increasedproductionofabdominaldonorsitefluidfollowingmicrosurgicalbreastreconstructionwithsuperficialinferiorepigastricarteryversusdeepinferiorepigastricarteryperforatorflaps
AT malatacharlesm increasedproductionofabdominaldonorsitefluidfollowingmicrosurgicalbreastreconstructionwithsuperficialinferiorepigastricarteryversusdeepinferiorepigastricarteryperforatorflaps