Cargando…
Co-creation and engagement in a DNA integrity cohort study
INTRODUCTION: The partnership between a research community engagement team (CE Team) and a community advisory board (CAB) formed the basis for bidirectional communication in developing resources for participant recruitment in a DNA integrity study. Engaging with a minoritized community, this partner...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10260344/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37313377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.556 |
_version_ | 1785057840711335936 |
---|---|
author | Parker, L. Lynette Bonner, Chantel M. Sobol, Robert W. Arrieta, Martha I. |
author_facet | Parker, L. Lynette Bonner, Chantel M. Sobol, Robert W. Arrieta, Martha I. |
author_sort | Parker, L. Lynette |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The partnership between a research community engagement team (CE Team) and a community advisory board (CAB) formed the basis for bidirectional communication in developing resources for participant recruitment in a DNA integrity study. Engaging with a minoritized community, this partnership focused on respect, accessibility, and expanded engagement. METHODS: A ten-member CAB, working in two groups defined by meeting time convenience, provided insight and feedback to the CE Team in the creation of recruitment and consent materials, via an iterative design process in which one CAB group reviewed and enhanced materials, and the second group tested and refined them further. The continuous analysis of CE Team notes from CAB meetings captured information needed both for materials refinement and implementation of CAB-suggested activities. RESULTS: The partnership resulted in the co-creation of recruitment and consent materials that facilitated the enrollment of 191 individuals into the study. The CAB encouraged and assisted in expanded engagement inclusive of community leaders. This broader engagement provided information about the DNA integrity study to community decision-makers as well as responded to questions and concerns about the research. The bidirectional communication between the CAB and the CE Team encouraged the researchers to consider topics and research interests related to the current study but also responsive to community concerns. CONCLUSIONS: The CAB helped the CE Team develop a better understanding of the language of partnership and respect. In this way, the partnership opened doors for expanded community engagement and effective communication with potential study participants. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10260344 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102603442023-06-13 Co-creation and engagement in a DNA integrity cohort study Parker, L. Lynette Bonner, Chantel M. Sobol, Robert W. Arrieta, Martha I. J Clin Transl Sci Research Article INTRODUCTION: The partnership between a research community engagement team (CE Team) and a community advisory board (CAB) formed the basis for bidirectional communication in developing resources for participant recruitment in a DNA integrity study. Engaging with a minoritized community, this partnership focused on respect, accessibility, and expanded engagement. METHODS: A ten-member CAB, working in two groups defined by meeting time convenience, provided insight and feedback to the CE Team in the creation of recruitment and consent materials, via an iterative design process in which one CAB group reviewed and enhanced materials, and the second group tested and refined them further. The continuous analysis of CE Team notes from CAB meetings captured information needed both for materials refinement and implementation of CAB-suggested activities. RESULTS: The partnership resulted in the co-creation of recruitment and consent materials that facilitated the enrollment of 191 individuals into the study. The CAB encouraged and assisted in expanded engagement inclusive of community leaders. This broader engagement provided information about the DNA integrity study to community decision-makers as well as responded to questions and concerns about the research. The bidirectional communication between the CAB and the CE Team encouraged the researchers to consider topics and research interests related to the current study but also responsive to community concerns. CONCLUSIONS: The CAB helped the CE Team develop a better understanding of the language of partnership and respect. In this way, the partnership opened doors for expanded community engagement and effective communication with potential study participants. Cambridge University Press 2023-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10260344/ /pubmed/37313377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.556 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Parker, L. Lynette Bonner, Chantel M. Sobol, Robert W. Arrieta, Martha I. Co-creation and engagement in a DNA integrity cohort study |
title | Co-creation and engagement in a DNA integrity cohort study |
title_full | Co-creation and engagement in a DNA integrity cohort study |
title_fullStr | Co-creation and engagement in a DNA integrity cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Co-creation and engagement in a DNA integrity cohort study |
title_short | Co-creation and engagement in a DNA integrity cohort study |
title_sort | co-creation and engagement in a dna integrity cohort study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10260344/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37313377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.556 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parkerllynette cocreationandengagementinadnaintegritycohortstudy AT bonnerchantelm cocreationandengagementinadnaintegritycohortstudy AT sobolrobertw cocreationandengagementinadnaintegritycohortstudy AT arrietamarthai cocreationandengagementinadnaintegritycohortstudy |