Cargando…

Co-creation and engagement in a DNA integrity cohort study

INTRODUCTION: The partnership between a research community engagement team (CE Team) and a community advisory board (CAB) formed the basis for bidirectional communication in developing resources for participant recruitment in a DNA integrity study. Engaging with a minoritized community, this partner...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parker, L. Lynette, Bonner, Chantel M., Sobol, Robert W., Arrieta, Martha I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10260344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37313377
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.556
_version_ 1785057840711335936
author Parker, L. Lynette
Bonner, Chantel M.
Sobol, Robert W.
Arrieta, Martha I.
author_facet Parker, L. Lynette
Bonner, Chantel M.
Sobol, Robert W.
Arrieta, Martha I.
author_sort Parker, L. Lynette
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The partnership between a research community engagement team (CE Team) and a community advisory board (CAB) formed the basis for bidirectional communication in developing resources for participant recruitment in a DNA integrity study. Engaging with a minoritized community, this partnership focused on respect, accessibility, and expanded engagement. METHODS: A ten-member CAB, working in two groups defined by meeting time convenience, provided insight and feedback to the CE Team in the creation of recruitment and consent materials, via an iterative design process in which one CAB group reviewed and enhanced materials, and the second group tested and refined them further. The continuous analysis of CE Team notes from CAB meetings captured information needed both for materials refinement and implementation of CAB-suggested activities. RESULTS: The partnership resulted in the co-creation of recruitment and consent materials that facilitated the enrollment of 191 individuals into the study. The CAB encouraged and assisted in expanded engagement inclusive of community leaders. This broader engagement provided information about the DNA integrity study to community decision-makers as well as responded to questions and concerns about the research. The bidirectional communication between the CAB and the CE Team encouraged the researchers to consider topics and research interests related to the current study but also responsive to community concerns. CONCLUSIONS: The CAB helped the CE Team develop a better understanding of the language of partnership and respect. In this way, the partnership opened doors for expanded community engagement and effective communication with potential study participants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10260344
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102603442023-06-13 Co-creation and engagement in a DNA integrity cohort study Parker, L. Lynette Bonner, Chantel M. Sobol, Robert W. Arrieta, Martha I. J Clin Transl Sci Research Article INTRODUCTION: The partnership between a research community engagement team (CE Team) and a community advisory board (CAB) formed the basis for bidirectional communication in developing resources for participant recruitment in a DNA integrity study. Engaging with a minoritized community, this partnership focused on respect, accessibility, and expanded engagement. METHODS: A ten-member CAB, working in two groups defined by meeting time convenience, provided insight and feedback to the CE Team in the creation of recruitment and consent materials, via an iterative design process in which one CAB group reviewed and enhanced materials, and the second group tested and refined them further. The continuous analysis of CE Team notes from CAB meetings captured information needed both for materials refinement and implementation of CAB-suggested activities. RESULTS: The partnership resulted in the co-creation of recruitment and consent materials that facilitated the enrollment of 191 individuals into the study. The CAB encouraged and assisted in expanded engagement inclusive of community leaders. This broader engagement provided information about the DNA integrity study to community decision-makers as well as responded to questions and concerns about the research. The bidirectional communication between the CAB and the CE Team encouraged the researchers to consider topics and research interests related to the current study but also responsive to community concerns. CONCLUSIONS: The CAB helped the CE Team develop a better understanding of the language of partnership and respect. In this way, the partnership opened doors for expanded community engagement and effective communication with potential study participants. Cambridge University Press 2023-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10260344/ /pubmed/37313377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.556 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Parker, L. Lynette
Bonner, Chantel M.
Sobol, Robert W.
Arrieta, Martha I.
Co-creation and engagement in a DNA integrity cohort study
title Co-creation and engagement in a DNA integrity cohort study
title_full Co-creation and engagement in a DNA integrity cohort study
title_fullStr Co-creation and engagement in a DNA integrity cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Co-creation and engagement in a DNA integrity cohort study
title_short Co-creation and engagement in a DNA integrity cohort study
title_sort co-creation and engagement in a dna integrity cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10260344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37313377
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.556
work_keys_str_mv AT parkerllynette cocreationandengagementinadnaintegritycohortstudy
AT bonnerchantelm cocreationandengagementinadnaintegritycohortstudy
AT sobolrobertw cocreationandengagementinadnaintegritycohortstudy
AT arrietamarthai cocreationandengagementinadnaintegritycohortstudy