Cargando…

Force sensor reduced measurement error compared with verbal command during sit‐to‐stand assessment of cerebral autoregulation

Current methods estimate the time delay (TD) before the onset of dynamic cerebral autoregulation (dCA) from verbal command to stand. A force sensor used during a sit‐to‐stand dCA measure provides an objective moment an individual stands (arise‐and‐off, AO). We hypothesized that the detection of AO w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Whitaker, Alicen A., Vidoni, Eric D., Montgomery, Robert N., Carter, Kailee, Struckle, Katelyn, Billinger, Sandra A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10260377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37308311
http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.15750
_version_ 1785057847293247488
author Whitaker, Alicen A.
Vidoni, Eric D.
Montgomery, Robert N.
Carter, Kailee
Struckle, Katelyn
Billinger, Sandra A.
author_facet Whitaker, Alicen A.
Vidoni, Eric D.
Montgomery, Robert N.
Carter, Kailee
Struckle, Katelyn
Billinger, Sandra A.
author_sort Whitaker, Alicen A.
collection PubMed
description Current methods estimate the time delay (TD) before the onset of dynamic cerebral autoregulation (dCA) from verbal command to stand. A force sensor used during a sit‐to‐stand dCA measure provides an objective moment an individual stands (arise‐and‐off, AO). We hypothesized that the detection of AO would improve the accuracy of TD compared with estimation. We measured middle cerebral artery blood velocity (MCAv) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) for 60 s sitting followed by 2‐min standing, three times separated by 20 min. TD was calculated as the time from: (1) verbal command and (2) AO, until an increase in cerebrovascular conductance index (CVCi = MCAv/MAP). Sixty‐five participants were enrolled: young adults (n = 25), older adults (n = 20), and individuals post‐stroke (n = 20). The TD calculated from AO ([Formula: see text]  = 2.98 ± 1.64 s) was shorter than TD estimated from verbal command ([Formula: see text]  = 3.35 ± 1.72 s, η (2) = 0.49, p < 0.001), improving measurement error by ~17%. TD measurement error was not related to age or stroke. Therefore, the force sensor provided an objective method to improve the calculation of TD compared with current methods. Our data support using a force sensor during sit‐to‐stand dCA measures in adults across the lifespan and post‐stroke.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10260377
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102603772023-06-15 Force sensor reduced measurement error compared with verbal command during sit‐to‐stand assessment of cerebral autoregulation Whitaker, Alicen A. Vidoni, Eric D. Montgomery, Robert N. Carter, Kailee Struckle, Katelyn Billinger, Sandra A. Physiol Rep Original Articles Current methods estimate the time delay (TD) before the onset of dynamic cerebral autoregulation (dCA) from verbal command to stand. A force sensor used during a sit‐to‐stand dCA measure provides an objective moment an individual stands (arise‐and‐off, AO). We hypothesized that the detection of AO would improve the accuracy of TD compared with estimation. We measured middle cerebral artery blood velocity (MCAv) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) for 60 s sitting followed by 2‐min standing, three times separated by 20 min. TD was calculated as the time from: (1) verbal command and (2) AO, until an increase in cerebrovascular conductance index (CVCi = MCAv/MAP). Sixty‐five participants were enrolled: young adults (n = 25), older adults (n = 20), and individuals post‐stroke (n = 20). The TD calculated from AO ([Formula: see text]  = 2.98 ± 1.64 s) was shorter than TD estimated from verbal command ([Formula: see text]  = 3.35 ± 1.72 s, η (2) = 0.49, p < 0.001), improving measurement error by ~17%. TD measurement error was not related to age or stroke. Therefore, the force sensor provided an objective method to improve the calculation of TD compared with current methods. Our data support using a force sensor during sit‐to‐stand dCA measures in adults across the lifespan and post‐stroke. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10260377/ /pubmed/37308311 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.15750 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Whitaker, Alicen A.
Vidoni, Eric D.
Montgomery, Robert N.
Carter, Kailee
Struckle, Katelyn
Billinger, Sandra A.
Force sensor reduced measurement error compared with verbal command during sit‐to‐stand assessment of cerebral autoregulation
title Force sensor reduced measurement error compared with verbal command during sit‐to‐stand assessment of cerebral autoregulation
title_full Force sensor reduced measurement error compared with verbal command during sit‐to‐stand assessment of cerebral autoregulation
title_fullStr Force sensor reduced measurement error compared with verbal command during sit‐to‐stand assessment of cerebral autoregulation
title_full_unstemmed Force sensor reduced measurement error compared with verbal command during sit‐to‐stand assessment of cerebral autoregulation
title_short Force sensor reduced measurement error compared with verbal command during sit‐to‐stand assessment of cerebral autoregulation
title_sort force sensor reduced measurement error compared with verbal command during sit‐to‐stand assessment of cerebral autoregulation
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10260377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37308311
http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.15750
work_keys_str_mv AT whitakeralicena forcesensorreducedmeasurementerrorcomparedwithverbalcommandduringsittostandassessmentofcerebralautoregulation
AT vidoniericd forcesensorreducedmeasurementerrorcomparedwithverbalcommandduringsittostandassessmentofcerebralautoregulation
AT montgomeryrobertn forcesensorreducedmeasurementerrorcomparedwithverbalcommandduringsittostandassessmentofcerebralautoregulation
AT carterkailee forcesensorreducedmeasurementerrorcomparedwithverbalcommandduringsittostandassessmentofcerebralautoregulation
AT strucklekatelyn forcesensorreducedmeasurementerrorcomparedwithverbalcommandduringsittostandassessmentofcerebralautoregulation
AT billingersandraa forcesensorreducedmeasurementerrorcomparedwithverbalcommandduringsittostandassessmentofcerebralautoregulation