Cargando…

The value of sonication in the differential diagnosis of septic and aseptic femoral and tibial shaft nonunion in comparison to conventional tissue culture and histopathology: a prospective multicenter clinical study

BACKGROUND: Septic and aseptic nonunion require different therapeutic strategies. However, differential diagnosis is challenging, as low-grade infections and biofilm-bound bacteria often remain undetected. Therefore, the examination of biofilm on implants by sonication and the evaluation of its valu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Trenkwalder, Katharina, Erichsen, Sandra, Weisemann, Ferdinand, Augat, Peter, Militz, Matthias, von Rüden, Christian, Hentschel, Tobias, Hackl, Simon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10260706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37308767
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10195-023-00708-4
_version_ 1785057860519985152
author Trenkwalder, Katharina
Erichsen, Sandra
Weisemann, Ferdinand
Augat, Peter
Militz, Matthias
von Rüden, Christian
Hentschel, Tobias
Hackl, Simon
author_facet Trenkwalder, Katharina
Erichsen, Sandra
Weisemann, Ferdinand
Augat, Peter
Militz, Matthias
von Rüden, Christian
Hentschel, Tobias
Hackl, Simon
author_sort Trenkwalder, Katharina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Septic and aseptic nonunion require different therapeutic strategies. However, differential diagnosis is challenging, as low-grade infections and biofilm-bound bacteria often remain undetected. Therefore, the examination of biofilm on implants by sonication and the evaluation of its value for differentiating between femoral or tibial shaft septic and aseptic nonunion in comparison to tissue culture and histopathology was the focus of this study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Osteosynthesis material for sonication and tissue samples for long-term culture and histopathologic examination from 53 patients with aseptic nonunion, 42 with septic nonunion and 32 with regular healed fractures were obtained during surgery. Sonication fluid was concentrated by membrane filtration and colony-forming units (CFU) were quantified after aerobic and anaerobic incubation. CFU cut-off values for differentiating between septic and aseptic nonunion or regular healers were determined by receiver operating characteristic analysis. The performances of the different diagnostic methods were calculated using cross-tabulation. RESULTS: The cut-off value for differentiating between septic and aseptic nonunion was ≥ 13.6 CFU/10 ml sonication fluid. With a sensitivity of 52% and a specificity of 93%, the diagnostic performance of membrane filtration was lower than that of tissue culture (69%, 96%) but higher than that of histopathology (14%, 87%). Considering two criteria for infection diagnosis, the sensitivity was similar for one tissue culture with the same pathogen in broth-cultured sonication fluid and two positive tissue cultures (55%). The combination of tissue culture and membrane-filtrated sonication fluid had a sensitivity of 50%, which increased up to 62% when using a lower CFU cut-off determined from regular healers. Furthermore, membrane filtration demonstrated a significantly higher polymicrobial detection rate compared to tissue culture and sonication fluid broth culture. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support a multimodal approach for the differential diagnosis of nonunion, with sonication demonstrating substantial usefulness. Level of Evidence: Level 2 Trial registration DRKS00014657 (date of registration: 2018/04/26)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10260706
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102607062023-06-15 The value of sonication in the differential diagnosis of septic and aseptic femoral and tibial shaft nonunion in comparison to conventional tissue culture and histopathology: a prospective multicenter clinical study Trenkwalder, Katharina Erichsen, Sandra Weisemann, Ferdinand Augat, Peter Militz, Matthias von Rüden, Christian Hentschel, Tobias Hackl, Simon J Orthop Traumatol Original Article BACKGROUND: Septic and aseptic nonunion require different therapeutic strategies. However, differential diagnosis is challenging, as low-grade infections and biofilm-bound bacteria often remain undetected. Therefore, the examination of biofilm on implants by sonication and the evaluation of its value for differentiating between femoral or tibial shaft septic and aseptic nonunion in comparison to tissue culture and histopathology was the focus of this study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Osteosynthesis material for sonication and tissue samples for long-term culture and histopathologic examination from 53 patients with aseptic nonunion, 42 with septic nonunion and 32 with regular healed fractures were obtained during surgery. Sonication fluid was concentrated by membrane filtration and colony-forming units (CFU) were quantified after aerobic and anaerobic incubation. CFU cut-off values for differentiating between septic and aseptic nonunion or regular healers were determined by receiver operating characteristic analysis. The performances of the different diagnostic methods were calculated using cross-tabulation. RESULTS: The cut-off value for differentiating between septic and aseptic nonunion was ≥ 13.6 CFU/10 ml sonication fluid. With a sensitivity of 52% and a specificity of 93%, the diagnostic performance of membrane filtration was lower than that of tissue culture (69%, 96%) but higher than that of histopathology (14%, 87%). Considering two criteria for infection diagnosis, the sensitivity was similar for one tissue culture with the same pathogen in broth-cultured sonication fluid and two positive tissue cultures (55%). The combination of tissue culture and membrane-filtrated sonication fluid had a sensitivity of 50%, which increased up to 62% when using a lower CFU cut-off determined from regular healers. Furthermore, membrane filtration demonstrated a significantly higher polymicrobial detection rate compared to tissue culture and sonication fluid broth culture. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support a multimodal approach for the differential diagnosis of nonunion, with sonication demonstrating substantial usefulness. Level of Evidence: Level 2 Trial registration DRKS00014657 (date of registration: 2018/04/26) Springer International Publishing 2023-06-12 2023-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10260706/ /pubmed/37308767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10195-023-00708-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Trenkwalder, Katharina
Erichsen, Sandra
Weisemann, Ferdinand
Augat, Peter
Militz, Matthias
von Rüden, Christian
Hentschel, Tobias
Hackl, Simon
The value of sonication in the differential diagnosis of septic and aseptic femoral and tibial shaft nonunion in comparison to conventional tissue culture and histopathology: a prospective multicenter clinical study
title The value of sonication in the differential diagnosis of septic and aseptic femoral and tibial shaft nonunion in comparison to conventional tissue culture and histopathology: a prospective multicenter clinical study
title_full The value of sonication in the differential diagnosis of septic and aseptic femoral and tibial shaft nonunion in comparison to conventional tissue culture and histopathology: a prospective multicenter clinical study
title_fullStr The value of sonication in the differential diagnosis of septic and aseptic femoral and tibial shaft nonunion in comparison to conventional tissue culture and histopathology: a prospective multicenter clinical study
title_full_unstemmed The value of sonication in the differential diagnosis of septic and aseptic femoral and tibial shaft nonunion in comparison to conventional tissue culture and histopathology: a prospective multicenter clinical study
title_short The value of sonication in the differential diagnosis of septic and aseptic femoral and tibial shaft nonunion in comparison to conventional tissue culture and histopathology: a prospective multicenter clinical study
title_sort value of sonication in the differential diagnosis of septic and aseptic femoral and tibial shaft nonunion in comparison to conventional tissue culture and histopathology: a prospective multicenter clinical study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10260706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37308767
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10195-023-00708-4
work_keys_str_mv AT trenkwalderkatharina thevalueofsonicationinthedifferentialdiagnosisofsepticandasepticfemoralandtibialshaftnonunionincomparisontoconventionaltissuecultureandhistopathologyaprospectivemulticenterclinicalstudy
AT erichsensandra thevalueofsonicationinthedifferentialdiagnosisofsepticandasepticfemoralandtibialshaftnonunionincomparisontoconventionaltissuecultureandhistopathologyaprospectivemulticenterclinicalstudy
AT weisemannferdinand thevalueofsonicationinthedifferentialdiagnosisofsepticandasepticfemoralandtibialshaftnonunionincomparisontoconventionaltissuecultureandhistopathologyaprospectivemulticenterclinicalstudy
AT augatpeter thevalueofsonicationinthedifferentialdiagnosisofsepticandasepticfemoralandtibialshaftnonunionincomparisontoconventionaltissuecultureandhistopathologyaprospectivemulticenterclinicalstudy
AT militzmatthias thevalueofsonicationinthedifferentialdiagnosisofsepticandasepticfemoralandtibialshaftnonunionincomparisontoconventionaltissuecultureandhistopathologyaprospectivemulticenterclinicalstudy
AT vonrudenchristian thevalueofsonicationinthedifferentialdiagnosisofsepticandasepticfemoralandtibialshaftnonunionincomparisontoconventionaltissuecultureandhistopathologyaprospectivemulticenterclinicalstudy
AT hentscheltobias thevalueofsonicationinthedifferentialdiagnosisofsepticandasepticfemoralandtibialshaftnonunionincomparisontoconventionaltissuecultureandhistopathologyaprospectivemulticenterclinicalstudy
AT thevalueofsonicationinthedifferentialdiagnosisofsepticandasepticfemoralandtibialshaftnonunionincomparisontoconventionaltissuecultureandhistopathologyaprospectivemulticenterclinicalstudy
AT hacklsimon thevalueofsonicationinthedifferentialdiagnosisofsepticandasepticfemoralandtibialshaftnonunionincomparisontoconventionaltissuecultureandhistopathologyaprospectivemulticenterclinicalstudy
AT trenkwalderkatharina valueofsonicationinthedifferentialdiagnosisofsepticandasepticfemoralandtibialshaftnonunionincomparisontoconventionaltissuecultureandhistopathologyaprospectivemulticenterclinicalstudy
AT erichsensandra valueofsonicationinthedifferentialdiagnosisofsepticandasepticfemoralandtibialshaftnonunionincomparisontoconventionaltissuecultureandhistopathologyaprospectivemulticenterclinicalstudy
AT weisemannferdinand valueofsonicationinthedifferentialdiagnosisofsepticandasepticfemoralandtibialshaftnonunionincomparisontoconventionaltissuecultureandhistopathologyaprospectivemulticenterclinicalstudy
AT augatpeter valueofsonicationinthedifferentialdiagnosisofsepticandasepticfemoralandtibialshaftnonunionincomparisontoconventionaltissuecultureandhistopathologyaprospectivemulticenterclinicalstudy
AT militzmatthias valueofsonicationinthedifferentialdiagnosisofsepticandasepticfemoralandtibialshaftnonunionincomparisontoconventionaltissuecultureandhistopathologyaprospectivemulticenterclinicalstudy
AT vonrudenchristian valueofsonicationinthedifferentialdiagnosisofsepticandasepticfemoralandtibialshaftnonunionincomparisontoconventionaltissuecultureandhistopathologyaprospectivemulticenterclinicalstudy
AT hentscheltobias valueofsonicationinthedifferentialdiagnosisofsepticandasepticfemoralandtibialshaftnonunionincomparisontoconventionaltissuecultureandhistopathologyaprospectivemulticenterclinicalstudy
AT valueofsonicationinthedifferentialdiagnosisofsepticandasepticfemoralandtibialshaftnonunionincomparisontoconventionaltissuecultureandhistopathologyaprospectivemulticenterclinicalstudy
AT hacklsimon valueofsonicationinthedifferentialdiagnosisofsepticandasepticfemoralandtibialshaftnonunionincomparisontoconventionaltissuecultureandhistopathologyaprospectivemulticenterclinicalstudy