Cargando…

Efficacy of non-surgical interventions for midfoot osteoarthritis: a systematic review

This systematic review aims to investigate the efficacy of non-surgical interventions for midfoot osteoarthritis (OA). Key databases and trial registries were searched from inception to 23 February 2023. All trials investigating non-surgical interventions for midfoot OA were included. Quality assess...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lim, Polly Q. X., Lithgow, Merridy J., Kaminski, Michelle R., Landorf, Karl B., Menz, Hylton B., Munteanu, Shannon E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10261166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37093273
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00296-023-05324-3
_version_ 1785057895117750272
author Lim, Polly Q. X.
Lithgow, Merridy J.
Kaminski, Michelle R.
Landorf, Karl B.
Menz, Hylton B.
Munteanu, Shannon E.
author_facet Lim, Polly Q. X.
Lithgow, Merridy J.
Kaminski, Michelle R.
Landorf, Karl B.
Menz, Hylton B.
Munteanu, Shannon E.
author_sort Lim, Polly Q. X.
collection PubMed
description This systematic review aims to investigate the efficacy of non-surgical interventions for midfoot osteoarthritis (OA). Key databases and trial registries were searched from inception to 23 February 2023. All trials investigating non-surgical interventions for midfoot OA were included. Quality assessment was performed using the National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment Tool. Outcomes were pain, function, health-related quality of life, and adverse events. Effects (mean differences, standardised mean differences, risk ratios) were calculated where possible for the short (0 to 12 weeks), medium (> 12 to 52 weeks), and long (> 52 weeks) term. Six trials (231 participants) were included (one feasibility trial and five case series) — all were judged to be of poor methodological quality. Two trials reported arch contouring foot orthoses to exert no-to-large effects on pain in the short and medium term, and small-to-very-large effects on function in the short and medium term. Two trials reported shoe stiffening inserts to exert medium-to-huge effects on pain in the short term, and small effects on function in the short term. Two trials of image-guided intra-articular corticosteroid injections reported favourable effects on pain in the short term, small effects on pain and function in the medium term, and minimal long term effects. Two trials reported minor adverse events, and none reported health-related quality of life outcomes. The current evidence suggests that arch contouring foot orthoses, shoe stiffening inserts and corticosteroid injections may be effective for midfoot OA. Rigorous randomised trials are required to evaluate the efficacy of non-surgical interventions for midfoot OA. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00296-023-05324-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10261166
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102611662023-06-15 Efficacy of non-surgical interventions for midfoot osteoarthritis: a systematic review Lim, Polly Q. X. Lithgow, Merridy J. Kaminski, Michelle R. Landorf, Karl B. Menz, Hylton B. Munteanu, Shannon E. Rheumatol Int Systematic Review This systematic review aims to investigate the efficacy of non-surgical interventions for midfoot osteoarthritis (OA). Key databases and trial registries were searched from inception to 23 February 2023. All trials investigating non-surgical interventions for midfoot OA were included. Quality assessment was performed using the National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment Tool. Outcomes were pain, function, health-related quality of life, and adverse events. Effects (mean differences, standardised mean differences, risk ratios) were calculated where possible for the short (0 to 12 weeks), medium (> 12 to 52 weeks), and long (> 52 weeks) term. Six trials (231 participants) were included (one feasibility trial and five case series) — all were judged to be of poor methodological quality. Two trials reported arch contouring foot orthoses to exert no-to-large effects on pain in the short and medium term, and small-to-very-large effects on function in the short and medium term. Two trials reported shoe stiffening inserts to exert medium-to-huge effects on pain in the short term, and small effects on function in the short term. Two trials of image-guided intra-articular corticosteroid injections reported favourable effects on pain in the short term, small effects on pain and function in the medium term, and minimal long term effects. Two trials reported minor adverse events, and none reported health-related quality of life outcomes. The current evidence suggests that arch contouring foot orthoses, shoe stiffening inserts and corticosteroid injections may be effective for midfoot OA. Rigorous randomised trials are required to evaluate the efficacy of non-surgical interventions for midfoot OA. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00296-023-05324-3. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-04-24 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10261166/ /pubmed/37093273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00296-023-05324-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Lim, Polly Q. X.
Lithgow, Merridy J.
Kaminski, Michelle R.
Landorf, Karl B.
Menz, Hylton B.
Munteanu, Shannon E.
Efficacy of non-surgical interventions for midfoot osteoarthritis: a systematic review
title Efficacy of non-surgical interventions for midfoot osteoarthritis: a systematic review
title_full Efficacy of non-surgical interventions for midfoot osteoarthritis: a systematic review
title_fullStr Efficacy of non-surgical interventions for midfoot osteoarthritis: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of non-surgical interventions for midfoot osteoarthritis: a systematic review
title_short Efficacy of non-surgical interventions for midfoot osteoarthritis: a systematic review
title_sort efficacy of non-surgical interventions for midfoot osteoarthritis: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10261166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37093273
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00296-023-05324-3
work_keys_str_mv AT limpollyqx efficacyofnonsurgicalinterventionsformidfootosteoarthritisasystematicreview
AT lithgowmerridyj efficacyofnonsurgicalinterventionsformidfootosteoarthritisasystematicreview
AT kaminskimicheller efficacyofnonsurgicalinterventionsformidfootosteoarthritisasystematicreview
AT landorfkarlb efficacyofnonsurgicalinterventionsformidfootosteoarthritisasystematicreview
AT menzhyltonb efficacyofnonsurgicalinterventionsformidfootosteoarthritisasystematicreview
AT munteanushannone efficacyofnonsurgicalinterventionsformidfootosteoarthritisasystematicreview