Cargando…

Virtual family-centered rounds: a quality improvement initiative to adapt inpatient care during COVID-19 using a human-centred participatory design approach

BACKGROUND: Family-centered rounds (FCR) are fundamental to pediatric inpatient care. During the COVID-19 pandemic, we aimed to design and implement a virtual family-centered rounds (vFCR) process that allowed continuation of inpatient rounds while following physical distancing guidelines and preser...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buba, Melanie, Dulude, Catherine, O’Donnell, Roisin, Rowan-Legg, Anne, Sloan, Megan, Nelson, Matthew, King, W. James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10261833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37312074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-023-04091-1
_version_ 1785057953538113536
author Buba, Melanie
Dulude, Catherine
O’Donnell, Roisin
Rowan-Legg, Anne
Sloan, Megan
Nelson, Matthew
King, W. James
author_facet Buba, Melanie
Dulude, Catherine
O’Donnell, Roisin
Rowan-Legg, Anne
Sloan, Megan
Nelson, Matthew
King, W. James
author_sort Buba, Melanie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Family-centered rounds (FCR) are fundamental to pediatric inpatient care. During the COVID-19 pandemic, we aimed to design and implement a virtual family-centered rounds (vFCR) process that allowed continuation of inpatient rounds while following physical distancing guidelines and preserving personal protective equipment (PPE). METHODS: A multidisciplinary team developed the vFCR process using a participatory design approach. From April through July 2020, quality improvement methods were used to iteratively evaluate and improve the process. Outcome measures included satisfaction, perceived effectiveness, and perceived usefulness of vFCR. Data were collected via questionnaire distributed to patients, families, staff and medical staff, and analyzed using descriptive statistics and content analysis. Virtual auditors monitored time per patient round and transition time between patients as balancing measures. RESULTS: Seventy-four percent (51/69) of health care providers surveyed and 79% (26/33) of patients and families were satisfied or very satisfied with vFCR. Eighty eight percent (61/69) of health care providers and 88% (29/33) of patients and families felt vFCR were useful. Audits revealed an average vFCR duration of 8.4 min (SD = 3.9) for a single patient round and transition time between patients averaged 2.9 min (SD = 2.6). CONCLUSION: Virtual family-centered rounds are an acceptable alternative to in-person FCR in a pandemic scenario, yielding high levels of stakeholder satisfaction and support. We believe vFCR are a useful method to support inpatient rounds, physical distancing, and preservation of PPE that may also be valuable beyond the pandemic. A rigorous process evaluation of vFCR is underway. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12887-023-04091-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10261833
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102618332023-06-14 Virtual family-centered rounds: a quality improvement initiative to adapt inpatient care during COVID-19 using a human-centred participatory design approach Buba, Melanie Dulude, Catherine O’Donnell, Roisin Rowan-Legg, Anne Sloan, Megan Nelson, Matthew King, W. James BMC Pediatr Research BACKGROUND: Family-centered rounds (FCR) are fundamental to pediatric inpatient care. During the COVID-19 pandemic, we aimed to design and implement a virtual family-centered rounds (vFCR) process that allowed continuation of inpatient rounds while following physical distancing guidelines and preserving personal protective equipment (PPE). METHODS: A multidisciplinary team developed the vFCR process using a participatory design approach. From April through July 2020, quality improvement methods were used to iteratively evaluate and improve the process. Outcome measures included satisfaction, perceived effectiveness, and perceived usefulness of vFCR. Data were collected via questionnaire distributed to patients, families, staff and medical staff, and analyzed using descriptive statistics and content analysis. Virtual auditors monitored time per patient round and transition time between patients as balancing measures. RESULTS: Seventy-four percent (51/69) of health care providers surveyed and 79% (26/33) of patients and families were satisfied or very satisfied with vFCR. Eighty eight percent (61/69) of health care providers and 88% (29/33) of patients and families felt vFCR were useful. Audits revealed an average vFCR duration of 8.4 min (SD = 3.9) for a single patient round and transition time between patients averaged 2.9 min (SD = 2.6). CONCLUSION: Virtual family-centered rounds are an acceptable alternative to in-person FCR in a pandemic scenario, yielding high levels of stakeholder satisfaction and support. We believe vFCR are a useful method to support inpatient rounds, physical distancing, and preservation of PPE that may also be valuable beyond the pandemic. A rigorous process evaluation of vFCR is underway. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12887-023-04091-1. BioMed Central 2023-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10261833/ /pubmed/37312074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-023-04091-1 Text en © Crown 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Buba, Melanie
Dulude, Catherine
O’Donnell, Roisin
Rowan-Legg, Anne
Sloan, Megan
Nelson, Matthew
King, W. James
Virtual family-centered rounds: a quality improvement initiative to adapt inpatient care during COVID-19 using a human-centred participatory design approach
title Virtual family-centered rounds: a quality improvement initiative to adapt inpatient care during COVID-19 using a human-centred participatory design approach
title_full Virtual family-centered rounds: a quality improvement initiative to adapt inpatient care during COVID-19 using a human-centred participatory design approach
title_fullStr Virtual family-centered rounds: a quality improvement initiative to adapt inpatient care during COVID-19 using a human-centred participatory design approach
title_full_unstemmed Virtual family-centered rounds: a quality improvement initiative to adapt inpatient care during COVID-19 using a human-centred participatory design approach
title_short Virtual family-centered rounds: a quality improvement initiative to adapt inpatient care during COVID-19 using a human-centred participatory design approach
title_sort virtual family-centered rounds: a quality improvement initiative to adapt inpatient care during covid-19 using a human-centred participatory design approach
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10261833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37312074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-023-04091-1
work_keys_str_mv AT bubamelanie virtualfamilycenteredroundsaqualityimprovementinitiativetoadaptinpatientcareduringcovid19usingahumancentredparticipatorydesignapproach
AT duludecatherine virtualfamilycenteredroundsaqualityimprovementinitiativetoadaptinpatientcareduringcovid19usingahumancentredparticipatorydesignapproach
AT odonnellroisin virtualfamilycenteredroundsaqualityimprovementinitiativetoadaptinpatientcareduringcovid19usingahumancentredparticipatorydesignapproach
AT rowanlegganne virtualfamilycenteredroundsaqualityimprovementinitiativetoadaptinpatientcareduringcovid19usingahumancentredparticipatorydesignapproach
AT sloanmegan virtualfamilycenteredroundsaqualityimprovementinitiativetoadaptinpatientcareduringcovid19usingahumancentredparticipatorydesignapproach
AT nelsonmatthew virtualfamilycenteredroundsaqualityimprovementinitiativetoadaptinpatientcareduringcovid19usingahumancentredparticipatorydesignapproach
AT kingwjames virtualfamilycenteredroundsaqualityimprovementinitiativetoadaptinpatientcareduringcovid19usingahumancentredparticipatorydesignapproach