Cargando…
Comparative efficacy and safety of multitarget angiogenesis inhibitor combined with immune checkpoint inhibitor and nivolumab monotherapy as second-line or beyond for advanced lung adenocarcinoma in driver-negative patients: a retrospective comparative cohort study
BACKGROUND: The efficacy of immune monotherapy is not satisfactory in patients with advanced, treated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Combining antiangiogenic agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can counteract the immunosuppression and confer synergistic therapeutic benefits. We explo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10261869/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37323173 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-23-260 |
_version_ | 1785057962182574080 |
---|---|
author | Yu, Lian Xu, Jianlin Qiao, Rong Zhong, Hua Brueckl, Wolfgang M. Zhong, Runbo |
author_facet | Yu, Lian Xu, Jianlin Qiao, Rong Zhong, Hua Brueckl, Wolfgang M. Zhong, Runbo |
author_sort | Yu, Lian |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The efficacy of immune monotherapy is not satisfactory in patients with advanced, treated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Combining antiangiogenic agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can counteract the immunosuppression and confer synergistic therapeutic benefits. We explored the efficacy and safety of anlotinib and ICIs as a second- and subsequent-line treatment for advanced lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) in patients without oncogenic driver alterations. METHODS: We reviewed patients with driver-negative LUAD who had received anlotinib, a multityrosine kinase inhibitor affecting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR), platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) and c-Kit, in combination with ICIs from October 2018 to July 2021 at Shanghai Chest Hospital as second- and subsequent-line treatment. Patients with advanced driver-negative LUAD who received nivolumab monotherapy as second-line treatment were included as a control group. RESULTS: In this study, 71 patients were included who had received anlotinib and programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) blockade combination therapy as second- and subsequent-line treatment, and 63 patients who had received nivolumab monotherapy as second-line therapy were included as controls, most of whom were male smokers at stage IV. The median progression-free survival (PFS) of the combination therapy and nivolumab monotherapy groups were 6.00 and 3.41 months, respectively (P<0.001). The median overall survival (OS) of the combination therapy and nivolumab monotherapy groups were 16.13 and 11.88 months, respectively (P=0.046). Twenty-nine patients (40.8%) in the combination group underwent previous immunotherapy (15 of whom were in first line), and they also achieved good survival (median OS: 25.67 months). The adverse reactions in the combination therapy group were mainly associated with either anlotinib or ICI administration, and there was a low incidence of grade 3 adverse events, all of which were resolved after intervention or discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of the multitargeting tyrosine kinase inhibitor anlotinib and PD-1 blockade demonstrated significant benefits as the second- and subsequent-line treatment in driver-negative patients with advanced LUAD, even in those who underwent previous immunotherapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10261869 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102618692023-06-15 Comparative efficacy and safety of multitarget angiogenesis inhibitor combined with immune checkpoint inhibitor and nivolumab monotherapy as second-line or beyond for advanced lung adenocarcinoma in driver-negative patients: a retrospective comparative cohort study Yu, Lian Xu, Jianlin Qiao, Rong Zhong, Hua Brueckl, Wolfgang M. Zhong, Runbo Transl Lung Cancer Res Original Article BACKGROUND: The efficacy of immune monotherapy is not satisfactory in patients with advanced, treated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Combining antiangiogenic agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can counteract the immunosuppression and confer synergistic therapeutic benefits. We explored the efficacy and safety of anlotinib and ICIs as a second- and subsequent-line treatment for advanced lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) in patients without oncogenic driver alterations. METHODS: We reviewed patients with driver-negative LUAD who had received anlotinib, a multityrosine kinase inhibitor affecting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR), platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) and c-Kit, in combination with ICIs from October 2018 to July 2021 at Shanghai Chest Hospital as second- and subsequent-line treatment. Patients with advanced driver-negative LUAD who received nivolumab monotherapy as second-line treatment were included as a control group. RESULTS: In this study, 71 patients were included who had received anlotinib and programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) blockade combination therapy as second- and subsequent-line treatment, and 63 patients who had received nivolumab monotherapy as second-line therapy were included as controls, most of whom were male smokers at stage IV. The median progression-free survival (PFS) of the combination therapy and nivolumab monotherapy groups were 6.00 and 3.41 months, respectively (P<0.001). The median overall survival (OS) of the combination therapy and nivolumab monotherapy groups were 16.13 and 11.88 months, respectively (P=0.046). Twenty-nine patients (40.8%) in the combination group underwent previous immunotherapy (15 of whom were in first line), and they also achieved good survival (median OS: 25.67 months). The adverse reactions in the combination therapy group were mainly associated with either anlotinib or ICI administration, and there was a low incidence of grade 3 adverse events, all of which were resolved after intervention or discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of the multitargeting tyrosine kinase inhibitor anlotinib and PD-1 blockade demonstrated significant benefits as the second- and subsequent-line treatment in driver-negative patients with advanced LUAD, even in those who underwent previous immunotherapy. AME Publishing Company 2023-05-24 2023-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10261869/ /pubmed/37323173 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-23-260 Text en 2023 Translational Lung Cancer Research. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Yu, Lian Xu, Jianlin Qiao, Rong Zhong, Hua Brueckl, Wolfgang M. Zhong, Runbo Comparative efficacy and safety of multitarget angiogenesis inhibitor combined with immune checkpoint inhibitor and nivolumab monotherapy as second-line or beyond for advanced lung adenocarcinoma in driver-negative patients: a retrospective comparative cohort study |
title | Comparative efficacy and safety of multitarget angiogenesis inhibitor combined with immune checkpoint inhibitor and nivolumab monotherapy as second-line or beyond for advanced lung adenocarcinoma in driver-negative patients: a retrospective comparative cohort study |
title_full | Comparative efficacy and safety of multitarget angiogenesis inhibitor combined with immune checkpoint inhibitor and nivolumab monotherapy as second-line or beyond for advanced lung adenocarcinoma in driver-negative patients: a retrospective comparative cohort study |
title_fullStr | Comparative efficacy and safety of multitarget angiogenesis inhibitor combined with immune checkpoint inhibitor and nivolumab monotherapy as second-line or beyond for advanced lung adenocarcinoma in driver-negative patients: a retrospective comparative cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative efficacy and safety of multitarget angiogenesis inhibitor combined with immune checkpoint inhibitor and nivolumab monotherapy as second-line or beyond for advanced lung adenocarcinoma in driver-negative patients: a retrospective comparative cohort study |
title_short | Comparative efficacy and safety of multitarget angiogenesis inhibitor combined with immune checkpoint inhibitor and nivolumab monotherapy as second-line or beyond for advanced lung adenocarcinoma in driver-negative patients: a retrospective comparative cohort study |
title_sort | comparative efficacy and safety of multitarget angiogenesis inhibitor combined with immune checkpoint inhibitor and nivolumab monotherapy as second-line or beyond for advanced lung adenocarcinoma in driver-negative patients: a retrospective comparative cohort study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10261869/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37323173 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-23-260 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yulian comparativeefficacyandsafetyofmultitargetangiogenesisinhibitorcombinedwithimmunecheckpointinhibitorandnivolumabmonotherapyassecondlineorbeyondforadvancedlungadenocarcinomaindrivernegativepatientsaretrospectivecomparativecohortstudy AT xujianlin comparativeefficacyandsafetyofmultitargetangiogenesisinhibitorcombinedwithimmunecheckpointinhibitorandnivolumabmonotherapyassecondlineorbeyondforadvancedlungadenocarcinomaindrivernegativepatientsaretrospectivecomparativecohortstudy AT qiaorong comparativeefficacyandsafetyofmultitargetangiogenesisinhibitorcombinedwithimmunecheckpointinhibitorandnivolumabmonotherapyassecondlineorbeyondforadvancedlungadenocarcinomaindrivernegativepatientsaretrospectivecomparativecohortstudy AT zhonghua comparativeefficacyandsafetyofmultitargetangiogenesisinhibitorcombinedwithimmunecheckpointinhibitorandnivolumabmonotherapyassecondlineorbeyondforadvancedlungadenocarcinomaindrivernegativepatientsaretrospectivecomparativecohortstudy AT bruecklwolfgangm comparativeefficacyandsafetyofmultitargetangiogenesisinhibitorcombinedwithimmunecheckpointinhibitorandnivolumabmonotherapyassecondlineorbeyondforadvancedlungadenocarcinomaindrivernegativepatientsaretrospectivecomparativecohortstudy AT zhongrunbo comparativeefficacyandsafetyofmultitargetangiogenesisinhibitorcombinedwithimmunecheckpointinhibitorandnivolumabmonotherapyassecondlineorbeyondforadvancedlungadenocarcinomaindrivernegativepatientsaretrospectivecomparativecohortstudy |