Cargando…

Knowledge, attitude and practice of infection prevention and control precautions among laboratory staff: a mixed-methods systematic review

BACKGROUND: Clinical laboratories provide diagnostic testing services to support the effective delivery of care in today’s complex healthcare systems. Processing clinical material and the use of chemicals or radiation presents potential hazard to laboratory workers, from both biological and chemical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aldhamy, Haifa, Maniatopoulos, Gregory, McCune, Victoria L., Mansi, Ilaf, Althaqafy, Majid, Pearce, Mark S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10262112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37312142
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-023-01257-5
_version_ 1785058003455574016
author Aldhamy, Haifa
Maniatopoulos, Gregory
McCune, Victoria L.
Mansi, Ilaf
Althaqafy, Majid
Pearce, Mark S.
author_facet Aldhamy, Haifa
Maniatopoulos, Gregory
McCune, Victoria L.
Mansi, Ilaf
Althaqafy, Majid
Pearce, Mark S.
author_sort Aldhamy, Haifa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clinical laboratories provide diagnostic testing services to support the effective delivery of care in today’s complex healthcare systems. Processing clinical material and the use of chemicals or radiation presents potential hazard to laboratory workers, from both biological and chemical sources. Nevertheless, the laboratory should be a safe workplace if the identification of possible hazards, clear guidelines, safety rules and infection prevention and control (IPC) precautions are applied and followed. The main aim of this systematic review was to identify, critically appraise and synthesise the research evidence to gain a clear explanation of the implementation and knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) of IPC guidelines among hospital laboratory staff. METHODS: For this systematic review we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus and CINAHL (EBSCO), PubMed, grey literature, reference lists and citations for studies published between database inception and November, 2021. All qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods studies whose aim was to explore risk perception and KAP of IPC guidelines among laboratory staff in any healthcare setting were included, without language or date restrictions. Evidence was narratively synthesised into group of themes. The quality of the evidence was assessed with Joanna Briggs Institutes Critical Appraisal Tools. RESULTS: After the full-text screening, a total of 34 articles remained and were included in the final review. Thirty papers were considered to be of high quality and the remaining four were considered to be of low quality. The available evidence shows that there was good knowledge, good attitudes and moderate immunisation status, but there was still poor practice of IPC precautions and an inadequate level of training among laboratory workers. CONCLUSION: There is a gap among KAP related to the implementation of IPC guidelines, which indicates that laboratory staff may be at high risk of acquiring infections in the workplace. These findings suggest that training (including IPC precautions, safety policies, safety equipment and materials, safety activities, initial biohazard handling, ongoing monitoring and potential exposure) of laboratory staff to increase their knowledge about IPC precautions could improve their use of these precautions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13756-023-01257-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10262112
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102621122023-06-14 Knowledge, attitude and practice of infection prevention and control precautions among laboratory staff: a mixed-methods systematic review Aldhamy, Haifa Maniatopoulos, Gregory McCune, Victoria L. Mansi, Ilaf Althaqafy, Majid Pearce, Mark S. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Review BACKGROUND: Clinical laboratories provide diagnostic testing services to support the effective delivery of care in today’s complex healthcare systems. Processing clinical material and the use of chemicals or radiation presents potential hazard to laboratory workers, from both biological and chemical sources. Nevertheless, the laboratory should be a safe workplace if the identification of possible hazards, clear guidelines, safety rules and infection prevention and control (IPC) precautions are applied and followed. The main aim of this systematic review was to identify, critically appraise and synthesise the research evidence to gain a clear explanation of the implementation and knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) of IPC guidelines among hospital laboratory staff. METHODS: For this systematic review we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus and CINAHL (EBSCO), PubMed, grey literature, reference lists and citations for studies published between database inception and November, 2021. All qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods studies whose aim was to explore risk perception and KAP of IPC guidelines among laboratory staff in any healthcare setting were included, without language or date restrictions. Evidence was narratively synthesised into group of themes. The quality of the evidence was assessed with Joanna Briggs Institutes Critical Appraisal Tools. RESULTS: After the full-text screening, a total of 34 articles remained and were included in the final review. Thirty papers were considered to be of high quality and the remaining four were considered to be of low quality. The available evidence shows that there was good knowledge, good attitudes and moderate immunisation status, but there was still poor practice of IPC precautions and an inadequate level of training among laboratory workers. CONCLUSION: There is a gap among KAP related to the implementation of IPC guidelines, which indicates that laboratory staff may be at high risk of acquiring infections in the workplace. These findings suggest that training (including IPC precautions, safety policies, safety equipment and materials, safety activities, initial biohazard handling, ongoing monitoring and potential exposure) of laboratory staff to increase their knowledge about IPC precautions could improve their use of these precautions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13756-023-01257-5. BioMed Central 2023-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10262112/ /pubmed/37312142 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-023-01257-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Aldhamy, Haifa
Maniatopoulos, Gregory
McCune, Victoria L.
Mansi, Ilaf
Althaqafy, Majid
Pearce, Mark S.
Knowledge, attitude and practice of infection prevention and control precautions among laboratory staff: a mixed-methods systematic review
title Knowledge, attitude and practice of infection prevention and control precautions among laboratory staff: a mixed-methods systematic review
title_full Knowledge, attitude and practice of infection prevention and control precautions among laboratory staff: a mixed-methods systematic review
title_fullStr Knowledge, attitude and practice of infection prevention and control precautions among laboratory staff: a mixed-methods systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Knowledge, attitude and practice of infection prevention and control precautions among laboratory staff: a mixed-methods systematic review
title_short Knowledge, attitude and practice of infection prevention and control precautions among laboratory staff: a mixed-methods systematic review
title_sort knowledge, attitude and practice of infection prevention and control precautions among laboratory staff: a mixed-methods systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10262112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37312142
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-023-01257-5
work_keys_str_mv AT aldhamyhaifa knowledgeattitudeandpracticeofinfectionpreventionandcontrolprecautionsamonglaboratorystaffamixedmethodssystematicreview
AT maniatopoulosgregory knowledgeattitudeandpracticeofinfectionpreventionandcontrolprecautionsamonglaboratorystaffamixedmethodssystematicreview
AT mccunevictorial knowledgeattitudeandpracticeofinfectionpreventionandcontrolprecautionsamonglaboratorystaffamixedmethodssystematicreview
AT mansiilaf knowledgeattitudeandpracticeofinfectionpreventionandcontrolprecautionsamonglaboratorystaffamixedmethodssystematicreview
AT althaqafymajid knowledgeattitudeandpracticeofinfectionpreventionandcontrolprecautionsamonglaboratorystaffamixedmethodssystematicreview
AT pearcemarks knowledgeattitudeandpracticeofinfectionpreventionandcontrolprecautionsamonglaboratorystaffamixedmethodssystematicreview