Cargando…

Effect of endometrial thickness on obstetric and neonatal outcomes in assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to explore the relationship of endometrial thickness (EMT) with obstetric and neonatal outcomes in assisted reproductive cycles. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched for eligible studies through April 2023....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fang, Zheng, Huang, Jialyu, Mao, Jiaqin, Yu, Lamei, Wang, Xiaohong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10262454/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37312205
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-023-01105-6
_version_ 1785058058006691840
author Fang, Zheng
Huang, Jialyu
Mao, Jiaqin
Yu, Lamei
Wang, Xiaohong
author_facet Fang, Zheng
Huang, Jialyu
Mao, Jiaqin
Yu, Lamei
Wang, Xiaohong
author_sort Fang, Zheng
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to explore the relationship of endometrial thickness (EMT) with obstetric and neonatal outcomes in assisted reproductive cycles. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched for eligible studies through April 2023. Obstetric outcomes include placenta previa, placental abruption, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and cesarean section (CS). Neonatal outcomes include birthweight, low birth weight (LBW), gestational age (GA), preterm birth (PTB), small for gestational age (SGA) and large for gestational age (LGA). The effect size was estimated as odds ratio (OR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) using a random-effects model. Inter-study heterogeneity was assessed by the chi-square homogeneity test. One-study removal method was used to determine the sensitivity of the meta-analysis. RESULTS: Nineteen studies involving 76,404 cycles were included. The pooled results revealed significant differences between the thin endometrium group and the normal group in placental abruption (OR = 2.45, 95% CI: 1.11–5.38, P = 0.03; I(2) = 0%), HDP (OR = 1.72, 95% CI: 1.44–2.05, P < 0.0001; I(2) = 0%), CS (OR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.06–1.67, P = 0.01; I(2) = 77%), GA (MD = -1.27 day, 95% CI: -2.41– -1.02, P = 0.03; I(2) = 73%), PTB (OR = 1.56, 95% CI: 1.34–1.81, P < 0.0001; I(2) = 33%), birthweight (MD = -78.88 g, 95% CI: -115.79– -41.98, P < 0.0001; I(2) = 48%), LBW (OR = 1.84, 95% CI: 1.52–2.22, P < 0.00001; I(2) = 3%) and SGA (OR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.17–1.70, P = 0.0003; I(2) = 15%). No statistical differences were found in placenta previa, GDM, and LGA. CONCLUSION: Thin endometrium was associated with lower birthweight or GA and higher risks of placental abruption, HDP, CS, PTB, LBW and SGA. Therefore, these pregnancies need special attention and close follow-up by obstetricians. Due to the limited number of included studies, further studies are needed to confirm the results. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12958-023-01105-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10262454
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102624542023-06-15 Effect of endometrial thickness on obstetric and neonatal outcomes in assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis Fang, Zheng Huang, Jialyu Mao, Jiaqin Yu, Lamei Wang, Xiaohong Reprod Biol Endocrinol Review PURPOSE: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to explore the relationship of endometrial thickness (EMT) with obstetric and neonatal outcomes in assisted reproductive cycles. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched for eligible studies through April 2023. Obstetric outcomes include placenta previa, placental abruption, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and cesarean section (CS). Neonatal outcomes include birthweight, low birth weight (LBW), gestational age (GA), preterm birth (PTB), small for gestational age (SGA) and large for gestational age (LGA). The effect size was estimated as odds ratio (OR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) using a random-effects model. Inter-study heterogeneity was assessed by the chi-square homogeneity test. One-study removal method was used to determine the sensitivity of the meta-analysis. RESULTS: Nineteen studies involving 76,404 cycles were included. The pooled results revealed significant differences between the thin endometrium group and the normal group in placental abruption (OR = 2.45, 95% CI: 1.11–5.38, P = 0.03; I(2) = 0%), HDP (OR = 1.72, 95% CI: 1.44–2.05, P < 0.0001; I(2) = 0%), CS (OR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.06–1.67, P = 0.01; I(2) = 77%), GA (MD = -1.27 day, 95% CI: -2.41– -1.02, P = 0.03; I(2) = 73%), PTB (OR = 1.56, 95% CI: 1.34–1.81, P < 0.0001; I(2) = 33%), birthweight (MD = -78.88 g, 95% CI: -115.79– -41.98, P < 0.0001; I(2) = 48%), LBW (OR = 1.84, 95% CI: 1.52–2.22, P < 0.00001; I(2) = 3%) and SGA (OR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.17–1.70, P = 0.0003; I(2) = 15%). No statistical differences were found in placenta previa, GDM, and LGA. CONCLUSION: Thin endometrium was associated with lower birthweight or GA and higher risks of placental abruption, HDP, CS, PTB, LBW and SGA. Therefore, these pregnancies need special attention and close follow-up by obstetricians. Due to the limited number of included studies, further studies are needed to confirm the results. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12958-023-01105-6. BioMed Central 2023-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10262454/ /pubmed/37312205 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-023-01105-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Fang, Zheng
Huang, Jialyu
Mao, Jiaqin
Yu, Lamei
Wang, Xiaohong
Effect of endometrial thickness on obstetric and neonatal outcomes in assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Effect of endometrial thickness on obstetric and neonatal outcomes in assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Effect of endometrial thickness on obstetric and neonatal outcomes in assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Effect of endometrial thickness on obstetric and neonatal outcomes in assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effect of endometrial thickness on obstetric and neonatal outcomes in assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Effect of endometrial thickness on obstetric and neonatal outcomes in assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort effect of endometrial thickness on obstetric and neonatal outcomes in assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10262454/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37312205
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-023-01105-6
work_keys_str_mv AT fangzheng effectofendometrialthicknessonobstetricandneonataloutcomesinassistedreproductionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT huangjialyu effectofendometrialthicknessonobstetricandneonataloutcomesinassistedreproductionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT maojiaqin effectofendometrialthicknessonobstetricandneonataloutcomesinassistedreproductionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yulamei effectofendometrialthicknessonobstetricandneonataloutcomesinassistedreproductionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangxiaohong effectofendometrialthicknessonobstetricandneonataloutcomesinassistedreproductionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis