Cargando…

Intra-prostatic gold fiducial marker insertion for image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT): five-year experience on 795 patients

INTRODUCTION: Prostate cancer is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer in males. The use of intra-prostatic fiducial markers (FM) for image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) has become widespread due to their accuracy, relatively safe use, low cost, and reproducibility. FM provides a tool to monitor pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mahdavi, Ali, Mofid, Bahram, Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farzad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10262562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37308834
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-023-01036-z
_version_ 1785058077732503552
author Mahdavi, Ali
Mofid, Bahram
Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farzad
author_facet Mahdavi, Ali
Mofid, Bahram
Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farzad
author_sort Mahdavi, Ali
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Prostate cancer is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer in males. The use of intra-prostatic fiducial markers (FM) for image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) has become widespread due to their accuracy, relatively safe use, low cost, and reproducibility. FM provides a tool to monitor prostate position and volume changes. Many studies reported low to moderate rates of complications following FM implantation. In the current study, we present our five years’ experience regarding the insertion technique, technical success, and rates of complication and migration of intraprostatic insertion of FM gold marker. METHODS: From January 2018 to January 2023, 795 patients with prostate cancer candidate for IGRT (with or without a history of radical prostatectomy) enrolled in this study. We used three fiducial markers (3*0.6 mm) inserted through an 18-gauge Chiba needle under transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) guidance. The patients were observed for complications up to seven days after the procedure. Besides, the rate of marker migration was recorded. RESULTS: All procedures were completed successfully, and all patients tolerated the procedure well with minimal discomfort. The rate of sepsis after the procedure was 1%, and transient urinary obstruction was 1.6%. Only two patients experienced marker migration shortly after insertion, and no fiducial migration was reported throughout radiotherapy. No other major complication was recorded. DISCUSSION: TRUS-guided intraprostatic FM implantation is technically feasible, safe, and well-tolerated in most patients. The FM migration can seldom occur, with negligible effects. This study can provide convincing evidence that TRUS-guided intra-prostatic FM insertion is an appropriate choice for IGRT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10262562
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102625622023-06-15 Intra-prostatic gold fiducial marker insertion for image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT): five-year experience on 795 patients Mahdavi, Ali Mofid, Bahram Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farzad BMC Med Imaging Research INTRODUCTION: Prostate cancer is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer in males. The use of intra-prostatic fiducial markers (FM) for image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) has become widespread due to their accuracy, relatively safe use, low cost, and reproducibility. FM provides a tool to monitor prostate position and volume changes. Many studies reported low to moderate rates of complications following FM implantation. In the current study, we present our five years’ experience regarding the insertion technique, technical success, and rates of complication and migration of intraprostatic insertion of FM gold marker. METHODS: From January 2018 to January 2023, 795 patients with prostate cancer candidate for IGRT (with or without a history of radical prostatectomy) enrolled in this study. We used three fiducial markers (3*0.6 mm) inserted through an 18-gauge Chiba needle under transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) guidance. The patients were observed for complications up to seven days after the procedure. Besides, the rate of marker migration was recorded. RESULTS: All procedures were completed successfully, and all patients tolerated the procedure well with minimal discomfort. The rate of sepsis after the procedure was 1%, and transient urinary obstruction was 1.6%. Only two patients experienced marker migration shortly after insertion, and no fiducial migration was reported throughout radiotherapy. No other major complication was recorded. DISCUSSION: TRUS-guided intraprostatic FM implantation is technically feasible, safe, and well-tolerated in most patients. The FM migration can seldom occur, with negligible effects. This study can provide convincing evidence that TRUS-guided intra-prostatic FM insertion is an appropriate choice for IGRT. BioMed Central 2023-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10262562/ /pubmed/37308834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-023-01036-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Mahdavi, Ali
Mofid, Bahram
Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farzad
Intra-prostatic gold fiducial marker insertion for image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT): five-year experience on 795 patients
title Intra-prostatic gold fiducial marker insertion for image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT): five-year experience on 795 patients
title_full Intra-prostatic gold fiducial marker insertion for image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT): five-year experience on 795 patients
title_fullStr Intra-prostatic gold fiducial marker insertion for image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT): five-year experience on 795 patients
title_full_unstemmed Intra-prostatic gold fiducial marker insertion for image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT): five-year experience on 795 patients
title_short Intra-prostatic gold fiducial marker insertion for image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT): five-year experience on 795 patients
title_sort intra-prostatic gold fiducial marker insertion for image-guided radiotherapy (igrt): five-year experience on 795 patients
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10262562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37308834
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-023-01036-z
work_keys_str_mv AT mahdaviali intraprostaticgoldfiducialmarkerinsertionforimageguidedradiotherapyigrtfiveyearexperienceon795patients
AT mofidbahram intraprostaticgoldfiducialmarkerinsertionforimageguidedradiotherapyigrtfiveyearexperienceon795patients
AT taghizadehhesaryfarzad intraprostaticgoldfiducialmarkerinsertionforimageguidedradiotherapyigrtfiveyearexperienceon795patients