Cargando…
Intra-prostatic gold fiducial marker insertion for image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT): five-year experience on 795 patients
INTRODUCTION: Prostate cancer is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer in males. The use of intra-prostatic fiducial markers (FM) for image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) has become widespread due to their accuracy, relatively safe use, low cost, and reproducibility. FM provides a tool to monitor pr...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10262562/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37308834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-023-01036-z |
_version_ | 1785058077732503552 |
---|---|
author | Mahdavi, Ali Mofid, Bahram Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farzad |
author_facet | Mahdavi, Ali Mofid, Bahram Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farzad |
author_sort | Mahdavi, Ali |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Prostate cancer is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer in males. The use of intra-prostatic fiducial markers (FM) for image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) has become widespread due to their accuracy, relatively safe use, low cost, and reproducibility. FM provides a tool to monitor prostate position and volume changes. Many studies reported low to moderate rates of complications following FM implantation. In the current study, we present our five years’ experience regarding the insertion technique, technical success, and rates of complication and migration of intraprostatic insertion of FM gold marker. METHODS: From January 2018 to January 2023, 795 patients with prostate cancer candidate for IGRT (with or without a history of radical prostatectomy) enrolled in this study. We used three fiducial markers (3*0.6 mm) inserted through an 18-gauge Chiba needle under transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) guidance. The patients were observed for complications up to seven days after the procedure. Besides, the rate of marker migration was recorded. RESULTS: All procedures were completed successfully, and all patients tolerated the procedure well with minimal discomfort. The rate of sepsis after the procedure was 1%, and transient urinary obstruction was 1.6%. Only two patients experienced marker migration shortly after insertion, and no fiducial migration was reported throughout radiotherapy. No other major complication was recorded. DISCUSSION: TRUS-guided intraprostatic FM implantation is technically feasible, safe, and well-tolerated in most patients. The FM migration can seldom occur, with negligible effects. This study can provide convincing evidence that TRUS-guided intra-prostatic FM insertion is an appropriate choice for IGRT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10262562 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102625622023-06-15 Intra-prostatic gold fiducial marker insertion for image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT): five-year experience on 795 patients Mahdavi, Ali Mofid, Bahram Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farzad BMC Med Imaging Research INTRODUCTION: Prostate cancer is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer in males. The use of intra-prostatic fiducial markers (FM) for image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) has become widespread due to their accuracy, relatively safe use, low cost, and reproducibility. FM provides a tool to monitor prostate position and volume changes. Many studies reported low to moderate rates of complications following FM implantation. In the current study, we present our five years’ experience regarding the insertion technique, technical success, and rates of complication and migration of intraprostatic insertion of FM gold marker. METHODS: From January 2018 to January 2023, 795 patients with prostate cancer candidate for IGRT (with or without a history of radical prostatectomy) enrolled in this study. We used three fiducial markers (3*0.6 mm) inserted through an 18-gauge Chiba needle under transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) guidance. The patients were observed for complications up to seven days after the procedure. Besides, the rate of marker migration was recorded. RESULTS: All procedures were completed successfully, and all patients tolerated the procedure well with minimal discomfort. The rate of sepsis after the procedure was 1%, and transient urinary obstruction was 1.6%. Only two patients experienced marker migration shortly after insertion, and no fiducial migration was reported throughout radiotherapy. No other major complication was recorded. DISCUSSION: TRUS-guided intraprostatic FM implantation is technically feasible, safe, and well-tolerated in most patients. The FM migration can seldom occur, with negligible effects. This study can provide convincing evidence that TRUS-guided intra-prostatic FM insertion is an appropriate choice for IGRT. BioMed Central 2023-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10262562/ /pubmed/37308834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-023-01036-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Mahdavi, Ali Mofid, Bahram Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farzad Intra-prostatic gold fiducial marker insertion for image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT): five-year experience on 795 patients |
title | Intra-prostatic gold fiducial marker insertion for image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT): five-year experience on 795 patients |
title_full | Intra-prostatic gold fiducial marker insertion for image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT): five-year experience on 795 patients |
title_fullStr | Intra-prostatic gold fiducial marker insertion for image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT): five-year experience on 795 patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Intra-prostatic gold fiducial marker insertion for image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT): five-year experience on 795 patients |
title_short | Intra-prostatic gold fiducial marker insertion for image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT): five-year experience on 795 patients |
title_sort | intra-prostatic gold fiducial marker insertion for image-guided radiotherapy (igrt): five-year experience on 795 patients |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10262562/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37308834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-023-01036-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mahdaviali intraprostaticgoldfiducialmarkerinsertionforimageguidedradiotherapyigrtfiveyearexperienceon795patients AT mofidbahram intraprostaticgoldfiducialmarkerinsertionforimageguidedradiotherapyigrtfiveyearexperienceon795patients AT taghizadehhesaryfarzad intraprostaticgoldfiducialmarkerinsertionforimageguidedradiotherapyigrtfiveyearexperienceon795patients |