Cargando…
A systematic review to identify and collate factors influencing patient journeys through clinical trials
Patient-centred trial design and delivery; improves recruitment and retention; increases participant satisfaction; encourages participation by a more representative cohort; and allows researchers to better meet participants’ needs. Research in this area mostly focusses on narrow facets of trial part...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10262634/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37325779 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20542704231166621 |
_version_ | 1785058091556929536 |
---|---|
author | Dobra, Rebecca Wilson, Gemma Matthews, Jessie Boeri, Marco Elborn, Stuart Kee, Frank Davies, Jane C Madge, Susan |
author_facet | Dobra, Rebecca Wilson, Gemma Matthews, Jessie Boeri, Marco Elborn, Stuart Kee, Frank Davies, Jane C Madge, Susan |
author_sort | Dobra, Rebecca |
collection | PubMed |
description | Patient-centred trial design and delivery; improves recruitment and retention; increases participant satisfaction; encourages participation by a more representative cohort; and allows researchers to better meet participants’ needs. Research in this area mostly focusses on narrow facets of trial participation. We aimed to systematically identify the breadth of patient-centred factors influencing participation and engagement in trials, and collate them into a framework. Through this we hoped to assist researchers to identify factors that could improve patient-centred trial design and delivery. Robust qualitative and mixed methods systematic reviews are becoming increasingly common in health research. The protocol for this review was prospectively registered on PROSPERO, CRD42020184886. We used the SPIDER (Sample, Phenomenon of Interest, Design, Evaluation, Research Type) framework as a standardised systematic search strategy tool. 3 databases were searched as well as references checking, and thematic synthesis was conducted. Screening agreement was performed and code and theme checking were conducted by 2 independent researchers. Data were drawn from 285 peer-reviewed articles. 300 discrete factors were identified, and sorted into 13 themes and subthemes. The full catalogue of factors is included in the Supplementary Material. A summary framework is included in the body of the article. This paper focusses on outlining common ground that themes share, highlighting critical features, and exploring interesting points from the data. Through this, we hope researchers from multiple specialities may be better able to meet patients’ needs, protect patients’ psychosocial wellbeing, and optimise trial recruitment and retention, with direct positive impact on research time and cost efficiency. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10262634 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102626342023-06-15 A systematic review to identify and collate factors influencing patient journeys through clinical trials Dobra, Rebecca Wilson, Gemma Matthews, Jessie Boeri, Marco Elborn, Stuart Kee, Frank Davies, Jane C Madge, Susan JRSM Open Research Paper Patient-centred trial design and delivery; improves recruitment and retention; increases participant satisfaction; encourages participation by a more representative cohort; and allows researchers to better meet participants’ needs. Research in this area mostly focusses on narrow facets of trial participation. We aimed to systematically identify the breadth of patient-centred factors influencing participation and engagement in trials, and collate them into a framework. Through this we hoped to assist researchers to identify factors that could improve patient-centred trial design and delivery. Robust qualitative and mixed methods systematic reviews are becoming increasingly common in health research. The protocol for this review was prospectively registered on PROSPERO, CRD42020184886. We used the SPIDER (Sample, Phenomenon of Interest, Design, Evaluation, Research Type) framework as a standardised systematic search strategy tool. 3 databases were searched as well as references checking, and thematic synthesis was conducted. Screening agreement was performed and code and theme checking were conducted by 2 independent researchers. Data were drawn from 285 peer-reviewed articles. 300 discrete factors were identified, and sorted into 13 themes and subthemes. The full catalogue of factors is included in the Supplementary Material. A summary framework is included in the body of the article. This paper focusses on outlining common ground that themes share, highlighting critical features, and exploring interesting points from the data. Through this, we hope researchers from multiple specialities may be better able to meet patients’ needs, protect patients’ psychosocial wellbeing, and optimise trial recruitment and retention, with direct positive impact on research time and cost efficiency. SAGE Publications 2023-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10262634/ /pubmed/37325779 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20542704231166621 Text en © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Dobra, Rebecca Wilson, Gemma Matthews, Jessie Boeri, Marco Elborn, Stuart Kee, Frank Davies, Jane C Madge, Susan A systematic review to identify and collate factors influencing patient journeys through clinical trials |
title | A systematic review to identify and collate factors influencing patient journeys through clinical trials |
title_full | A systematic review to identify and collate factors influencing patient journeys through clinical trials |
title_fullStr | A systematic review to identify and collate factors influencing patient journeys through clinical trials |
title_full_unstemmed | A systematic review to identify and collate factors influencing patient journeys through clinical trials |
title_short | A systematic review to identify and collate factors influencing patient journeys through clinical trials |
title_sort | systematic review to identify and collate factors influencing patient journeys through clinical trials |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10262634/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37325779 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20542704231166621 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dobrarebecca asystematicreviewtoidentifyandcollatefactorsinfluencingpatientjourneysthroughclinicaltrials AT wilsongemma asystematicreviewtoidentifyandcollatefactorsinfluencingpatientjourneysthroughclinicaltrials AT matthewsjessie asystematicreviewtoidentifyandcollatefactorsinfluencingpatientjourneysthroughclinicaltrials AT boerimarco asystematicreviewtoidentifyandcollatefactorsinfluencingpatientjourneysthroughclinicaltrials AT elbornstuart asystematicreviewtoidentifyandcollatefactorsinfluencingpatientjourneysthroughclinicaltrials AT keefrank asystematicreviewtoidentifyandcollatefactorsinfluencingpatientjourneysthroughclinicaltrials AT daviesjanec asystematicreviewtoidentifyandcollatefactorsinfluencingpatientjourneysthroughclinicaltrials AT madgesusan asystematicreviewtoidentifyandcollatefactorsinfluencingpatientjourneysthroughclinicaltrials AT dobrarebecca systematicreviewtoidentifyandcollatefactorsinfluencingpatientjourneysthroughclinicaltrials AT wilsongemma systematicreviewtoidentifyandcollatefactorsinfluencingpatientjourneysthroughclinicaltrials AT matthewsjessie systematicreviewtoidentifyandcollatefactorsinfluencingpatientjourneysthroughclinicaltrials AT boerimarco systematicreviewtoidentifyandcollatefactorsinfluencingpatientjourneysthroughclinicaltrials AT elbornstuart systematicreviewtoidentifyandcollatefactorsinfluencingpatientjourneysthroughclinicaltrials AT keefrank systematicreviewtoidentifyandcollatefactorsinfluencingpatientjourneysthroughclinicaltrials AT daviesjanec systematicreviewtoidentifyandcollatefactorsinfluencingpatientjourneysthroughclinicaltrials AT madgesusan systematicreviewtoidentifyandcollatefactorsinfluencingpatientjourneysthroughclinicaltrials |