Cargando…

Analysis of distributions reveals real differences on dichotic listening scores between left- and right-handers

About 95% of right-handers and 70% of left-handers have a left-hemispheric specialization for language. Dichotic listening is often used as an indirect measure of this language asymmetry. However, while it reliably produces a right-ear advantage (REA), corresponding to the left-hemispheric specializ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karlsson, Emma M, Hugdahl, Kenneth, Hirnstein, Marco, Carey, David P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10262840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37342803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/texcom/tgad009
_version_ 1785058113931444224
author Karlsson, Emma M
Hugdahl, Kenneth
Hirnstein, Marco
Carey, David P
author_facet Karlsson, Emma M
Hugdahl, Kenneth
Hirnstein, Marco
Carey, David P
author_sort Karlsson, Emma M
collection PubMed
description About 95% of right-handers and 70% of left-handers have a left-hemispheric specialization for language. Dichotic listening is often used as an indirect measure of this language asymmetry. However, while it reliably produces a right-ear advantage (REA), corresponding to the left-hemispheric specialization of language, it paradoxically often fails to obtain statistical evidence of mean differences between left- and right-handers. We hypothesized that non-normality of the underlying distributions might be in part responsible for the similarities in means. Here, we compare the mean ear advantage scores, and also contrast the distributions at multiple quantiles, in two large independent samples (Ns = 1,358 and 1,042) of right-handers and left-handers. Right-handers had an increased mean REA, and a larger proportion had an REA than in the left-handers. We also found that more left-handers are represented in the left-eared end of the distribution. These data suggest that subtle shifts in the distributions of DL scores for right- and left-handers may be at least partially responsible for the unreliability of significantly reduced mean REA in left-handers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10262840
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102628402023-06-20 Analysis of distributions reveals real differences on dichotic listening scores between left- and right-handers Karlsson, Emma M Hugdahl, Kenneth Hirnstein, Marco Carey, David P Cereb Cortex Commun Original Article About 95% of right-handers and 70% of left-handers have a left-hemispheric specialization for language. Dichotic listening is often used as an indirect measure of this language asymmetry. However, while it reliably produces a right-ear advantage (REA), corresponding to the left-hemispheric specialization of language, it paradoxically often fails to obtain statistical evidence of mean differences between left- and right-handers. We hypothesized that non-normality of the underlying distributions might be in part responsible for the similarities in means. Here, we compare the mean ear advantage scores, and also contrast the distributions at multiple quantiles, in two large independent samples (Ns = 1,358 and 1,042) of right-handers and left-handers. Right-handers had an increased mean REA, and a larger proportion had an REA than in the left-handers. We also found that more left-handers are represented in the left-eared end of the distribution. These data suggest that subtle shifts in the distributions of DL scores for right- and left-handers may be at least partially responsible for the unreliability of significantly reduced mean REA in left-handers. Oxford University Press 2023-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10262840/ /pubmed/37342803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/texcom/tgad009 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Karlsson, Emma M
Hugdahl, Kenneth
Hirnstein, Marco
Carey, David P
Analysis of distributions reveals real differences on dichotic listening scores between left- and right-handers
title Analysis of distributions reveals real differences on dichotic listening scores between left- and right-handers
title_full Analysis of distributions reveals real differences on dichotic listening scores between left- and right-handers
title_fullStr Analysis of distributions reveals real differences on dichotic listening scores between left- and right-handers
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of distributions reveals real differences on dichotic listening scores between left- and right-handers
title_short Analysis of distributions reveals real differences on dichotic listening scores between left- and right-handers
title_sort analysis of distributions reveals real differences on dichotic listening scores between left- and right-handers
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10262840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37342803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/texcom/tgad009
work_keys_str_mv AT karlssonemmam analysisofdistributionsrevealsrealdifferencesondichoticlisteningscoresbetweenleftandrighthanders
AT hugdahlkenneth analysisofdistributionsrevealsrealdifferencesondichoticlisteningscoresbetweenleftandrighthanders
AT hirnsteinmarco analysisofdistributionsrevealsrealdifferencesondichoticlisteningscoresbetweenleftandrighthanders
AT careydavidp analysisofdistributionsrevealsrealdifferencesondichoticlisteningscoresbetweenleftandrighthanders