Cargando…
Analysis of distributions reveals real differences on dichotic listening scores between left- and right-handers
About 95% of right-handers and 70% of left-handers have a left-hemispheric specialization for language. Dichotic listening is often used as an indirect measure of this language asymmetry. However, while it reliably produces a right-ear advantage (REA), corresponding to the left-hemispheric specializ...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10262840/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37342803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/texcom/tgad009 |
_version_ | 1785058113931444224 |
---|---|
author | Karlsson, Emma M Hugdahl, Kenneth Hirnstein, Marco Carey, David P |
author_facet | Karlsson, Emma M Hugdahl, Kenneth Hirnstein, Marco Carey, David P |
author_sort | Karlsson, Emma M |
collection | PubMed |
description | About 95% of right-handers and 70% of left-handers have a left-hemispheric specialization for language. Dichotic listening is often used as an indirect measure of this language asymmetry. However, while it reliably produces a right-ear advantage (REA), corresponding to the left-hemispheric specialization of language, it paradoxically often fails to obtain statistical evidence of mean differences between left- and right-handers. We hypothesized that non-normality of the underlying distributions might be in part responsible for the similarities in means. Here, we compare the mean ear advantage scores, and also contrast the distributions at multiple quantiles, in two large independent samples (Ns = 1,358 and 1,042) of right-handers and left-handers. Right-handers had an increased mean REA, and a larger proportion had an REA than in the left-handers. We also found that more left-handers are represented in the left-eared end of the distribution. These data suggest that subtle shifts in the distributions of DL scores for right- and left-handers may be at least partially responsible for the unreliability of significantly reduced mean REA in left-handers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10262840 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102628402023-06-20 Analysis of distributions reveals real differences on dichotic listening scores between left- and right-handers Karlsson, Emma M Hugdahl, Kenneth Hirnstein, Marco Carey, David P Cereb Cortex Commun Original Article About 95% of right-handers and 70% of left-handers have a left-hemispheric specialization for language. Dichotic listening is often used as an indirect measure of this language asymmetry. However, while it reliably produces a right-ear advantage (REA), corresponding to the left-hemispheric specialization of language, it paradoxically often fails to obtain statistical evidence of mean differences between left- and right-handers. We hypothesized that non-normality of the underlying distributions might be in part responsible for the similarities in means. Here, we compare the mean ear advantage scores, and also contrast the distributions at multiple quantiles, in two large independent samples (Ns = 1,358 and 1,042) of right-handers and left-handers. Right-handers had an increased mean REA, and a larger proportion had an REA than in the left-handers. We also found that more left-handers are represented in the left-eared end of the distribution. These data suggest that subtle shifts in the distributions of DL scores for right- and left-handers may be at least partially responsible for the unreliability of significantly reduced mean REA in left-handers. Oxford University Press 2023-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10262840/ /pubmed/37342803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/texcom/tgad009 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Karlsson, Emma M Hugdahl, Kenneth Hirnstein, Marco Carey, David P Analysis of distributions reveals real differences on dichotic listening scores between left- and right-handers |
title | Analysis of distributions reveals real differences on dichotic listening scores between left- and right-handers |
title_full | Analysis of distributions reveals real differences on dichotic listening scores between left- and right-handers |
title_fullStr | Analysis of distributions reveals real differences on dichotic listening scores between left- and right-handers |
title_full_unstemmed | Analysis of distributions reveals real differences on dichotic listening scores between left- and right-handers |
title_short | Analysis of distributions reveals real differences on dichotic listening scores between left- and right-handers |
title_sort | analysis of distributions reveals real differences on dichotic listening scores between left- and right-handers |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10262840/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37342803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/texcom/tgad009 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT karlssonemmam analysisofdistributionsrevealsrealdifferencesondichoticlisteningscoresbetweenleftandrighthanders AT hugdahlkenneth analysisofdistributionsrevealsrealdifferencesondichoticlisteningscoresbetweenleftandrighthanders AT hirnsteinmarco analysisofdistributionsrevealsrealdifferencesondichoticlisteningscoresbetweenleftandrighthanders AT careydavidp analysisofdistributionsrevealsrealdifferencesondichoticlisteningscoresbetweenleftandrighthanders |