Cargando…
FIXATION METHODS IN LATARJET: BIOMECHANICAL COMPARISON OF SCREW TYPES AND PLATE FIXATION
OBJECTIVE: Latarjet procedure is often preferred in recurrent shoulder dislocations accompanied by glenoid bone loss. It is observed that the superiority of bone graft fixation methods is still controversial. The aim of this study is to biomechanically compare the bone graft fixation methods in the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
ATHA EDITORA
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10263413/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37323153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220233102e260966 |
_version_ | 1785058235648049152 |
---|---|
author | ARZU, UFUK ERSIN, MEHMET CHODZA, MEHMET ŞAHIN, KORAY KILIÇOĞLU, ÖNDER ERŞEN, ALI |
author_facet | ARZU, UFUK ERSIN, MEHMET CHODZA, MEHMET ŞAHIN, KORAY KILIÇOĞLU, ÖNDER ERŞEN, ALI |
author_sort | ARZU, UFUK |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Latarjet procedure is often preferred in recurrent shoulder dislocations accompanied by glenoid bone loss. It is observed that the superiority of bone graft fixation methods is still controversial. The aim of this study is to biomechanically compare the bone graft fixation methods in the Latarjet procedure. METHODS: 15 third-generation scapula bone models were divided into 3 groups. Graft was fixated in the first group with fully-threaded cortical screws of 3.5mm diameter, in the second group two 16 mm partially-threaded cannulated screws of 4.5mm diameter, and in the third group via a mini plate and screw. The hemispherical humeral head was placed on the tip of the cyclic charge device, and thus, the charge applied to the coracoid graft was homogeneous. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was found between paired comparisons (p>0.05). The forces in 5 mm displacement in total vary between 502-857N. Total stiffness measurements ranged between 105 and 625; the mean value was 258.13±53.54 with no statistically significant difference by groups (p = 0.958). CONCLUSION: This biomechanical study showed that there is no difference between three coracoid fixation options in terms of fixation strength. Unlike previous assumptions, plate fixation is not biomechanically superior to screw fixation. Surgeons should consider their personal preferences and experience in choosing fixation methods. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10263413 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | ATHA EDITORA |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102634132023-06-15 FIXATION METHODS IN LATARJET: BIOMECHANICAL COMPARISON OF SCREW TYPES AND PLATE FIXATION ARZU, UFUK ERSIN, MEHMET CHODZA, MEHMET ŞAHIN, KORAY KILIÇOĞLU, ÖNDER ERŞEN, ALI Acta Ortop Bras Original Article OBJECTIVE: Latarjet procedure is often preferred in recurrent shoulder dislocations accompanied by glenoid bone loss. It is observed that the superiority of bone graft fixation methods is still controversial. The aim of this study is to biomechanically compare the bone graft fixation methods in the Latarjet procedure. METHODS: 15 third-generation scapula bone models were divided into 3 groups. Graft was fixated in the first group with fully-threaded cortical screws of 3.5mm diameter, in the second group two 16 mm partially-threaded cannulated screws of 4.5mm diameter, and in the third group via a mini plate and screw. The hemispherical humeral head was placed on the tip of the cyclic charge device, and thus, the charge applied to the coracoid graft was homogeneous. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was found between paired comparisons (p>0.05). The forces in 5 mm displacement in total vary between 502-857N. Total stiffness measurements ranged between 105 and 625; the mean value was 258.13±53.54 with no statistically significant difference by groups (p = 0.958). CONCLUSION: This biomechanical study showed that there is no difference between three coracoid fixation options in terms of fixation strength. Unlike previous assumptions, plate fixation is not biomechanically superior to screw fixation. Surgeons should consider their personal preferences and experience in choosing fixation methods. ATHA EDITORA 2023-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10263413/ /pubmed/37323153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220233102e260966 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article ARZU, UFUK ERSIN, MEHMET CHODZA, MEHMET ŞAHIN, KORAY KILIÇOĞLU, ÖNDER ERŞEN, ALI FIXATION METHODS IN LATARJET: BIOMECHANICAL COMPARISON OF SCREW TYPES AND PLATE FIXATION |
title | FIXATION METHODS IN LATARJET: BIOMECHANICAL COMPARISON OF SCREW TYPES AND PLATE FIXATION |
title_full | FIXATION METHODS IN LATARJET: BIOMECHANICAL COMPARISON OF SCREW TYPES AND PLATE FIXATION |
title_fullStr | FIXATION METHODS IN LATARJET: BIOMECHANICAL COMPARISON OF SCREW TYPES AND PLATE FIXATION |
title_full_unstemmed | FIXATION METHODS IN LATARJET: BIOMECHANICAL COMPARISON OF SCREW TYPES AND PLATE FIXATION |
title_short | FIXATION METHODS IN LATARJET: BIOMECHANICAL COMPARISON OF SCREW TYPES AND PLATE FIXATION |
title_sort | fixation methods in latarjet: biomechanical comparison of screw types and plate fixation |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10263413/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37323153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220233102e260966 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT arzuufuk fixationmethodsinlatarjetbiomechanicalcomparisonofscrewtypesandplatefixation AT ersinmehmet fixationmethodsinlatarjetbiomechanicalcomparisonofscrewtypesandplatefixation AT chodzamehmet fixationmethodsinlatarjetbiomechanicalcomparisonofscrewtypesandplatefixation AT sahinkoray fixationmethodsinlatarjetbiomechanicalcomparisonofscrewtypesandplatefixation AT kilicogluonder fixationmethodsinlatarjetbiomechanicalcomparisonofscrewtypesandplatefixation AT ersenali fixationmethodsinlatarjetbiomechanicalcomparisonofscrewtypesandplatefixation |