Cargando…

A randomized controlled trial of pulsed field ablation versus standard-of-care ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: The ADVENT trial rationale and design

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an effective treatment for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). However, potential complications can occur due to the propagation of thermal energy into nontarget tissues adjacent to the targeted myocardium. Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a novel ablati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reddy, Vivek Y., Lehmann, John W., Gerstenfeld, Edward P., Mugglin, Andrew S., Schneider, Christopher W., Achyutha, Anitha B., Mansour, Moussa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10264259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37323994
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hroo.2023.03.001
_version_ 1785058287478112256
author Reddy, Vivek Y.
Lehmann, John W.
Gerstenfeld, Edward P.
Mugglin, Andrew S.
Schneider, Christopher W.
Achyutha, Anitha B.
Mansour, Moussa
author_facet Reddy, Vivek Y.
Lehmann, John W.
Gerstenfeld, Edward P.
Mugglin, Andrew S.
Schneider, Christopher W.
Achyutha, Anitha B.
Mansour, Moussa
author_sort Reddy, Vivek Y.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an effective treatment for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). However, potential complications can occur due to the propagation of thermal energy into nontarget tissues adjacent to the targeted myocardium. Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a novel ablation modality with the potential for preferential myocardial tissue ablation to minimize damage to collateral cardiac structures. A multielectrode pentaspline catheter has demonstrated safety and efficacy in treating PAF in single-arm, first-in-human studies. OBJECTIVE: The study sought to perform a randomized clinical trial to directly compare this PFA catheter with conventional ablation—either radiofrequency or cryoballoon ablation. METHODS: The ADVENT (Randomized Controlled Trial for Pulsed Field Ablation versus Standard of Care Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation) trial is a multicenter, prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled trial to compare PVI using PFA vs conventional thermal ablation for drug-resistant PAF—with each site employing either (but not both) cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation as a control condition. The sample size is adaptively determined based on Bayesian statistical methods. All patients will undergo PVI, and be followed for 12 months. RESULTS: The primary effectiveness endpoint is a composite of acute procedural success and freedom from any documented atrial arrhythmia recurrence, repeat ablation, or use of antiarrhythmic drugs after a 3-month postablation blanking period. The primary safety endpoint is a composite of defined acute and chronic device- and procedure-related serious adverse events. Both primary endpoints will be evaluated for noninferiority of the novel PFA system compared with standard-of-care thermal ablation. CONCLUSIONS: By providing objective, comparative data, this study aims to scientifically determine whether the pentaspline PFA catheter is safe and effective for PVI ablation to treat drug-resistant PAF.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10264259
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102642592023-06-15 A randomized controlled trial of pulsed field ablation versus standard-of-care ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: The ADVENT trial rationale and design Reddy, Vivek Y. Lehmann, John W. Gerstenfeld, Edward P. Mugglin, Andrew S. Schneider, Christopher W. Achyutha, Anitha B. Mansour, Moussa Heart Rhythm O2 Design Paper BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an effective treatment for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). However, potential complications can occur due to the propagation of thermal energy into nontarget tissues adjacent to the targeted myocardium. Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a novel ablation modality with the potential for preferential myocardial tissue ablation to minimize damage to collateral cardiac structures. A multielectrode pentaspline catheter has demonstrated safety and efficacy in treating PAF in single-arm, first-in-human studies. OBJECTIVE: The study sought to perform a randomized clinical trial to directly compare this PFA catheter with conventional ablation—either radiofrequency or cryoballoon ablation. METHODS: The ADVENT (Randomized Controlled Trial for Pulsed Field Ablation versus Standard of Care Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation) trial is a multicenter, prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled trial to compare PVI using PFA vs conventional thermal ablation for drug-resistant PAF—with each site employing either (but not both) cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation as a control condition. The sample size is adaptively determined based on Bayesian statistical methods. All patients will undergo PVI, and be followed for 12 months. RESULTS: The primary effectiveness endpoint is a composite of acute procedural success and freedom from any documented atrial arrhythmia recurrence, repeat ablation, or use of antiarrhythmic drugs after a 3-month postablation blanking period. The primary safety endpoint is a composite of defined acute and chronic device- and procedure-related serious adverse events. Both primary endpoints will be evaluated for noninferiority of the novel PFA system compared with standard-of-care thermal ablation. CONCLUSIONS: By providing objective, comparative data, this study aims to scientifically determine whether the pentaspline PFA catheter is safe and effective for PVI ablation to treat drug-resistant PAF. Elsevier 2023-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10264259/ /pubmed/37323994 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hroo.2023.03.001 Text en © 2023 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Design Paper
Reddy, Vivek Y.
Lehmann, John W.
Gerstenfeld, Edward P.
Mugglin, Andrew S.
Schneider, Christopher W.
Achyutha, Anitha B.
Mansour, Moussa
A randomized controlled trial of pulsed field ablation versus standard-of-care ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: The ADVENT trial rationale and design
title A randomized controlled trial of pulsed field ablation versus standard-of-care ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: The ADVENT trial rationale and design
title_full A randomized controlled trial of pulsed field ablation versus standard-of-care ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: The ADVENT trial rationale and design
title_fullStr A randomized controlled trial of pulsed field ablation versus standard-of-care ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: The ADVENT trial rationale and design
title_full_unstemmed A randomized controlled trial of pulsed field ablation versus standard-of-care ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: The ADVENT trial rationale and design
title_short A randomized controlled trial of pulsed field ablation versus standard-of-care ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: The ADVENT trial rationale and design
title_sort randomized controlled trial of pulsed field ablation versus standard-of-care ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: the advent trial rationale and design
topic Design Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10264259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37323994
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hroo.2023.03.001
work_keys_str_mv AT reddyviveky arandomizedcontrolledtrialofpulsedfieldablationversusstandardofcareablationforparoxysmalatrialfibrillationtheadventtrialrationaleanddesign
AT lehmannjohnw arandomizedcontrolledtrialofpulsedfieldablationversusstandardofcareablationforparoxysmalatrialfibrillationtheadventtrialrationaleanddesign
AT gerstenfeldedwardp arandomizedcontrolledtrialofpulsedfieldablationversusstandardofcareablationforparoxysmalatrialfibrillationtheadventtrialrationaleanddesign
AT mugglinandrews arandomizedcontrolledtrialofpulsedfieldablationversusstandardofcareablationforparoxysmalatrialfibrillationtheadventtrialrationaleanddesign
AT schneiderchristopherw arandomizedcontrolledtrialofpulsedfieldablationversusstandardofcareablationforparoxysmalatrialfibrillationtheadventtrialrationaleanddesign
AT achyuthaanithab arandomizedcontrolledtrialofpulsedfieldablationversusstandardofcareablationforparoxysmalatrialfibrillationtheadventtrialrationaleanddesign
AT mansourmoussa arandomizedcontrolledtrialofpulsedfieldablationversusstandardofcareablationforparoxysmalatrialfibrillationtheadventtrialrationaleanddesign
AT reddyviveky randomizedcontrolledtrialofpulsedfieldablationversusstandardofcareablationforparoxysmalatrialfibrillationtheadventtrialrationaleanddesign
AT lehmannjohnw randomizedcontrolledtrialofpulsedfieldablationversusstandardofcareablationforparoxysmalatrialfibrillationtheadventtrialrationaleanddesign
AT gerstenfeldedwardp randomizedcontrolledtrialofpulsedfieldablationversusstandardofcareablationforparoxysmalatrialfibrillationtheadventtrialrationaleanddesign
AT mugglinandrews randomizedcontrolledtrialofpulsedfieldablationversusstandardofcareablationforparoxysmalatrialfibrillationtheadventtrialrationaleanddesign
AT schneiderchristopherw randomizedcontrolledtrialofpulsedfieldablationversusstandardofcareablationforparoxysmalatrialfibrillationtheadventtrialrationaleanddesign
AT achyuthaanithab randomizedcontrolledtrialofpulsedfieldablationversusstandardofcareablationforparoxysmalatrialfibrillationtheadventtrialrationaleanddesign
AT mansourmoussa randomizedcontrolledtrialofpulsedfieldablationversusstandardofcareablationforparoxysmalatrialfibrillationtheadventtrialrationaleanddesign