Cargando…

Clinical utility of geriatric assessment tools in older patients with gastrointestinal cancer

BACKGROUND: Geriatric 8 (G8) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) are recommended to predict overall survival (OS) or risk of serious adverse events (SAEs) in older cancer patients. However, the clinical utility is relatively unknown in older patients suffering malnutrition with gastro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Doi, Ayako, Mizukami, Takuro, Takeda, Hiroyuki, Umemoto, Kumiko, Arai, Hiroyuki, Horie, Yoshiki, Izawa, Naoki, Ogura, Takashi, Sunakawa, Yu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10264801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37324017
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1110236
_version_ 1785058404297867264
author Doi, Ayako
Mizukami, Takuro
Takeda, Hiroyuki
Umemoto, Kumiko
Arai, Hiroyuki
Horie, Yoshiki
Izawa, Naoki
Ogura, Takashi
Sunakawa, Yu
author_facet Doi, Ayako
Mizukami, Takuro
Takeda, Hiroyuki
Umemoto, Kumiko
Arai, Hiroyuki
Horie, Yoshiki
Izawa, Naoki
Ogura, Takashi
Sunakawa, Yu
author_sort Doi, Ayako
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Geriatric 8 (G8) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) are recommended to predict overall survival (OS) or risk of serious adverse events (SAEs) in older cancer patients. However, the clinical utility is relatively unknown in older patients suffering malnutrition with gastrointestinal (GI) cancer, including gastric cancer (GC) and pancreatic cancer (PC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively included patients aged ≥65 years with GC, PC, and colorectal cancer (CRC) who received a G8 questionnaire at first visit from April 2018 to March 2020. The associations between G8/IADL and safety or OS were assessed in patients with advanced/unresectable tumors. RESULTS: Of 207 patients (median age: 75 years), the median G8 score was 10.5 and normal G8 score rate was 6.8%. Both the median G8 score and normal G8 (>14) score rate numerically increased in the order of GC < PC < CRC. There was no clear association between the G8 standard cutoff value of 14 and SAEs or OS. However, OS was significantly longer in patients with G8 >11 than in those with G8 ≤11 (19.3 vs. 10.5 months, p = 0.0017). Furthermore, OS was significantly better in patients with normal IADL than in those with abnormal IADL (17.6 vs. 11.4 months, p = 0.049). CONCLUSION: The G8 cutoff value of 14 would not be clinically useful in patients with GI cancer for predicting OS or SAEs; however, the cutoff value of 11 and IADL may be useful to predict OS for older patients with GI cancers including GC and PC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10264801
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102648012023-06-15 Clinical utility of geriatric assessment tools in older patients with gastrointestinal cancer Doi, Ayako Mizukami, Takuro Takeda, Hiroyuki Umemoto, Kumiko Arai, Hiroyuki Horie, Yoshiki Izawa, Naoki Ogura, Takashi Sunakawa, Yu Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: Geriatric 8 (G8) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) are recommended to predict overall survival (OS) or risk of serious adverse events (SAEs) in older cancer patients. However, the clinical utility is relatively unknown in older patients suffering malnutrition with gastrointestinal (GI) cancer, including gastric cancer (GC) and pancreatic cancer (PC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively included patients aged ≥65 years with GC, PC, and colorectal cancer (CRC) who received a G8 questionnaire at first visit from April 2018 to March 2020. The associations between G8/IADL and safety or OS were assessed in patients with advanced/unresectable tumors. RESULTS: Of 207 patients (median age: 75 years), the median G8 score was 10.5 and normal G8 score rate was 6.8%. Both the median G8 score and normal G8 (>14) score rate numerically increased in the order of GC < PC < CRC. There was no clear association between the G8 standard cutoff value of 14 and SAEs or OS. However, OS was significantly longer in patients with G8 >11 than in those with G8 ≤11 (19.3 vs. 10.5 months, p = 0.0017). Furthermore, OS was significantly better in patients with normal IADL than in those with abnormal IADL (17.6 vs. 11.4 months, p = 0.049). CONCLUSION: The G8 cutoff value of 14 would not be clinically useful in patients with GI cancer for predicting OS or SAEs; however, the cutoff value of 11 and IADL may be useful to predict OS for older patients with GI cancers including GC and PC. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10264801/ /pubmed/37324017 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1110236 Text en Copyright © 2023 Doi, Mizukami, Takeda, Umemoto, Arai, Horie, Izawa, Ogura and Sunakawa https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Doi, Ayako
Mizukami, Takuro
Takeda, Hiroyuki
Umemoto, Kumiko
Arai, Hiroyuki
Horie, Yoshiki
Izawa, Naoki
Ogura, Takashi
Sunakawa, Yu
Clinical utility of geriatric assessment tools in older patients with gastrointestinal cancer
title Clinical utility of geriatric assessment tools in older patients with gastrointestinal cancer
title_full Clinical utility of geriatric assessment tools in older patients with gastrointestinal cancer
title_fullStr Clinical utility of geriatric assessment tools in older patients with gastrointestinal cancer
title_full_unstemmed Clinical utility of geriatric assessment tools in older patients with gastrointestinal cancer
title_short Clinical utility of geriatric assessment tools in older patients with gastrointestinal cancer
title_sort clinical utility of geriatric assessment tools in older patients with gastrointestinal cancer
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10264801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37324017
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1110236
work_keys_str_mv AT doiayako clinicalutilityofgeriatricassessmenttoolsinolderpatientswithgastrointestinalcancer
AT mizukamitakuro clinicalutilityofgeriatricassessmenttoolsinolderpatientswithgastrointestinalcancer
AT takedahiroyuki clinicalutilityofgeriatricassessmenttoolsinolderpatientswithgastrointestinalcancer
AT umemotokumiko clinicalutilityofgeriatricassessmenttoolsinolderpatientswithgastrointestinalcancer
AT araihiroyuki clinicalutilityofgeriatricassessmenttoolsinolderpatientswithgastrointestinalcancer
AT horieyoshiki clinicalutilityofgeriatricassessmenttoolsinolderpatientswithgastrointestinalcancer
AT izawanaoki clinicalutilityofgeriatricassessmenttoolsinolderpatientswithgastrointestinalcancer
AT oguratakashi clinicalutilityofgeriatricassessmenttoolsinolderpatientswithgastrointestinalcancer
AT sunakawayu clinicalutilityofgeriatricassessmenttoolsinolderpatientswithgastrointestinalcancer