Cargando…

Posterior Flange Cyclic Loading in a Novel Total Elbow Arthroplasty

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to test the static and dynamic strength and loosening resistance of the posterior flange of a novel total elbow arthroplasty. We also examined the forces experienced by the ulnohumeral joint and the posterior olecranon during expected elbow use. METHODS: Static st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gibbs, Christopher M., Nelson, Brody, Combs, Taylor, Moody, Devon, Kaufmann, Robert A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10264840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37323979
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsg.2022.12.008
_version_ 1785058411336957952
author Gibbs, Christopher M.
Nelson, Brody
Combs, Taylor
Moody, Devon
Kaufmann, Robert A.
author_facet Gibbs, Christopher M.
Nelson, Brody
Combs, Taylor
Moody, Devon
Kaufmann, Robert A.
author_sort Gibbs, Christopher M.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to test the static and dynamic strength and loosening resistance of the posterior flange of a novel total elbow arthroplasty. We also examined the forces experienced by the ulnohumeral joint and the posterior olecranon during expected elbow use. METHODS: Static stress analysis was performed for 3 flange sizes. Failure testing was conducted on 5 flanges (1 medium size and 4 small sizes). Loading occurred to reach 10,000 cycles. If this was accomplished, the cyclic load was increased until failure occurred. If failure occurred before 10,000 cycles, a lower force was employed. The safety factor for each implant size was calculated, and implant failure or loosening was observed. RESULTS: Static testing revealed a safety factor of 6.6, 5.74, and 4.53 for the small, medium, and large flanges, respectively. The medium-sized flange completed 10,000 cycles with 1,000 N at 1 Hz, and then the force was increased until it failed at 23,000 cycles. Two small-sized flanges failed at 2,345 and 2,453 cycles, respectively, when loaded with 1,000 N. Two more small flanges were loaded with 729 N for 10,000 cycles, and then the cyclic load was continued until they failed at 17,000 and 17,340 cycles, respectively. No screw loosening was noted in any specimens. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the posterior flange withstood static and dynamic forces greater than what is expected during in vivo use of a novel total elbow arthroplasty design. Static strength calculation and cyclic loading demonstrate that the medium-sized posterior flange is stronger than the small-sized posterior flange. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Ensuring that the ulnar body component and the posterior flange maintain secure connectivity with the polyethylene wear component may be beneficial to the proper function of a novel nonmechanically linked total elbow arthroplasty.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10264840
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102648402023-06-15 Posterior Flange Cyclic Loading in a Novel Total Elbow Arthroplasty Gibbs, Christopher M. Nelson, Brody Combs, Taylor Moody, Devon Kaufmann, Robert A. J Hand Surg Glob Online Original Research PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to test the static and dynamic strength and loosening resistance of the posterior flange of a novel total elbow arthroplasty. We also examined the forces experienced by the ulnohumeral joint and the posterior olecranon during expected elbow use. METHODS: Static stress analysis was performed for 3 flange sizes. Failure testing was conducted on 5 flanges (1 medium size and 4 small sizes). Loading occurred to reach 10,000 cycles. If this was accomplished, the cyclic load was increased until failure occurred. If failure occurred before 10,000 cycles, a lower force was employed. The safety factor for each implant size was calculated, and implant failure or loosening was observed. RESULTS: Static testing revealed a safety factor of 6.6, 5.74, and 4.53 for the small, medium, and large flanges, respectively. The medium-sized flange completed 10,000 cycles with 1,000 N at 1 Hz, and then the force was increased until it failed at 23,000 cycles. Two small-sized flanges failed at 2,345 and 2,453 cycles, respectively, when loaded with 1,000 N. Two more small flanges were loaded with 729 N for 10,000 cycles, and then the cyclic load was continued until they failed at 17,000 and 17,340 cycles, respectively. No screw loosening was noted in any specimens. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the posterior flange withstood static and dynamic forces greater than what is expected during in vivo use of a novel total elbow arthroplasty design. Static strength calculation and cyclic loading demonstrate that the medium-sized posterior flange is stronger than the small-sized posterior flange. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Ensuring that the ulnar body component and the posterior flange maintain secure connectivity with the polyethylene wear component may be beneficial to the proper function of a novel nonmechanically linked total elbow arthroplasty. Elsevier 2023-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10264840/ /pubmed/37323979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsg.2022.12.008 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Gibbs, Christopher M.
Nelson, Brody
Combs, Taylor
Moody, Devon
Kaufmann, Robert A.
Posterior Flange Cyclic Loading in a Novel Total Elbow Arthroplasty
title Posterior Flange Cyclic Loading in a Novel Total Elbow Arthroplasty
title_full Posterior Flange Cyclic Loading in a Novel Total Elbow Arthroplasty
title_fullStr Posterior Flange Cyclic Loading in a Novel Total Elbow Arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed Posterior Flange Cyclic Loading in a Novel Total Elbow Arthroplasty
title_short Posterior Flange Cyclic Loading in a Novel Total Elbow Arthroplasty
title_sort posterior flange cyclic loading in a novel total elbow arthroplasty
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10264840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37323979
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsg.2022.12.008
work_keys_str_mv AT gibbschristopherm posteriorflangecyclicloadinginanoveltotalelbowarthroplasty
AT nelsonbrody posteriorflangecyclicloadinginanoveltotalelbowarthroplasty
AT combstaylor posteriorflangecyclicloadinginanoveltotalelbowarthroplasty
AT moodydevon posteriorflangecyclicloadinginanoveltotalelbowarthroplasty
AT kaufmannroberta posteriorflangecyclicloadinginanoveltotalelbowarthroplasty