Cargando…
Robotic-assisted mitral valve surgery without aortic cross-clamping: a safe and feasible technique
BACKGROUND: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of robotic-assisted mitral valve surgery without aortic cross-clamping. METHODS: From January 2010 to September 2022, 28 patients underwent robotic-assisted mitral valve surgery without aortic cross-clamping i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10264847/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37324626 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1111496 |
_version_ | 1785058413025165312 |
---|---|
author | Ökten, Eyüp Murat Özcan, Zeynep Sıla Arslanhan, Gökhan Şenay, Şahin Güllü, Ahmet Ümit Koçyiğit, Muharrem Değirmencioğlu, Aleks Alhan, Cem |
author_facet | Ökten, Eyüp Murat Özcan, Zeynep Sıla Arslanhan, Gökhan Şenay, Şahin Güllü, Ahmet Ümit Koçyiğit, Muharrem Değirmencioğlu, Aleks Alhan, Cem |
author_sort | Ökten, Eyüp Murat |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of robotic-assisted mitral valve surgery without aortic cross-clamping. METHODS: From January 2010 to September 2022, 28 patients underwent robotic-assisted mitral valve surgery without aortic cross-clamping in our center using DaVinci Robotic Systems. Clinical data during the perioperative period and early outcomes of the patients were recorded. RESULTS: Most patients were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II and III. Mean age and EuroScore II of the patients were 71.5 ± 13.5 and 8.4 ± 3.7 respectively. The patients underwent either mitral valve replacement (n = 16, 57.1%) or mitral valve repair (n = 12, 42.9%). Concomitant procedures were performed including tricuspid valve repair, tricuspid valve replacement, PFO closure, left atrial appendage ligation, left atrial appendage thrombectomy and cryoablation for atrial fibrillation. Mean CPB times were 140.9 ± 44.6 and mean fibrillatory arrest duration was 76.6 ± 18.4. Mean duration of ICU stay was 32.5 ± 28.8 h and mean duration of hospital stay 9.8 ± 8.3 days. One patient (3.6%) underwent revision due to bleeding. New onset renal failure was observed in one (3.6%) patient and postoperative stroke in one (3.6%) patient. Postoperative early mortality was observed in two (7.1%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic-assisted mitral valve surgery without cross-clamping is a safe and feasible technique in high-risk patients undergoing redo mitral surgery with severe adhesions as well as in primary mitral valve cases that are complicated with ascending aortic calcification. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10264847 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102648472023-06-15 Robotic-assisted mitral valve surgery without aortic cross-clamping: a safe and feasible technique Ökten, Eyüp Murat Özcan, Zeynep Sıla Arslanhan, Gökhan Şenay, Şahin Güllü, Ahmet Ümit Koçyiğit, Muharrem Değirmencioğlu, Aleks Alhan, Cem Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine BACKGROUND: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of robotic-assisted mitral valve surgery without aortic cross-clamping. METHODS: From January 2010 to September 2022, 28 patients underwent robotic-assisted mitral valve surgery without aortic cross-clamping in our center using DaVinci Robotic Systems. Clinical data during the perioperative period and early outcomes of the patients were recorded. RESULTS: Most patients were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II and III. Mean age and EuroScore II of the patients were 71.5 ± 13.5 and 8.4 ± 3.7 respectively. The patients underwent either mitral valve replacement (n = 16, 57.1%) or mitral valve repair (n = 12, 42.9%). Concomitant procedures were performed including tricuspid valve repair, tricuspid valve replacement, PFO closure, left atrial appendage ligation, left atrial appendage thrombectomy and cryoablation for atrial fibrillation. Mean CPB times were 140.9 ± 44.6 and mean fibrillatory arrest duration was 76.6 ± 18.4. Mean duration of ICU stay was 32.5 ± 28.8 h and mean duration of hospital stay 9.8 ± 8.3 days. One patient (3.6%) underwent revision due to bleeding. New onset renal failure was observed in one (3.6%) patient and postoperative stroke in one (3.6%) patient. Postoperative early mortality was observed in two (7.1%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic-assisted mitral valve surgery without cross-clamping is a safe and feasible technique in high-risk patients undergoing redo mitral surgery with severe adhesions as well as in primary mitral valve cases that are complicated with ascending aortic calcification. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10264847/ /pubmed/37324626 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1111496 Text en © 2023 Ökten, Özcan, Arslanhan, Şenay, Güllü, Koçyiğit, Değirmencioğlu and Alhan. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Cardiovascular Medicine Ökten, Eyüp Murat Özcan, Zeynep Sıla Arslanhan, Gökhan Şenay, Şahin Güllü, Ahmet Ümit Koçyiğit, Muharrem Değirmencioğlu, Aleks Alhan, Cem Robotic-assisted mitral valve surgery without aortic cross-clamping: a safe and feasible technique |
title | Robotic-assisted mitral valve surgery without aortic cross-clamping: a safe and feasible technique |
title_full | Robotic-assisted mitral valve surgery without aortic cross-clamping: a safe and feasible technique |
title_fullStr | Robotic-assisted mitral valve surgery without aortic cross-clamping: a safe and feasible technique |
title_full_unstemmed | Robotic-assisted mitral valve surgery without aortic cross-clamping: a safe and feasible technique |
title_short | Robotic-assisted mitral valve surgery without aortic cross-clamping: a safe and feasible technique |
title_sort | robotic-assisted mitral valve surgery without aortic cross-clamping: a safe and feasible technique |
topic | Cardiovascular Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10264847/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37324626 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1111496 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT okteneyupmurat roboticassistedmitralvalvesurgerywithoutaorticcrossclampingasafeandfeasibletechnique AT ozcanzeynepsıla roboticassistedmitralvalvesurgerywithoutaorticcrossclampingasafeandfeasibletechnique AT arslanhangokhan roboticassistedmitralvalvesurgerywithoutaorticcrossclampingasafeandfeasibletechnique AT senaysahin roboticassistedmitralvalvesurgerywithoutaorticcrossclampingasafeandfeasibletechnique AT gulluahmetumit roboticassistedmitralvalvesurgerywithoutaorticcrossclampingasafeandfeasibletechnique AT kocyigitmuharrem roboticassistedmitralvalvesurgerywithoutaorticcrossclampingasafeandfeasibletechnique AT degirmencioglualeks roboticassistedmitralvalvesurgerywithoutaorticcrossclampingasafeandfeasibletechnique AT alhancem roboticassistedmitralvalvesurgerywithoutaorticcrossclampingasafeandfeasibletechnique |