Cargando…

Sex, racial, and ethnic diversity in clinical trials

Diverse representation in clinical trials is crucial to understand the efficacy and safety of drugs in minority groups. This review aims to (1) describe research participants' sex, racial, and ethnic diversity in clinical drug trials and (2) describe the sex distribution of researchers conducti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bøttern, Julie, Stage, Tore Bjerregaard, Dunvald, Ann‐Cathrine Dalgård
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10264921/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36908052
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cts.13513
_version_ 1785058427020509184
author Bøttern, Julie
Stage, Tore Bjerregaard
Dunvald, Ann‐Cathrine Dalgård
author_facet Bøttern, Julie
Stage, Tore Bjerregaard
Dunvald, Ann‐Cathrine Dalgård
author_sort Bøttern, Julie
collection PubMed
description Diverse representation in clinical trials is crucial to understand the efficacy and safety of drugs in minority groups. This review aims to (1) describe research participants' sex, racial, and ethnic diversity in clinical drug trials and (2) describe the sex distribution of researchers conducting the research. We reviewed all clinical drug trials published in the journals “Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics” and “Clinical and Translational Science” in 2000–2001 and 2020–2021 and analyzed the research participants' and researchers' demographics. We compared the race of the research participants with the concurrent race diversity of the reference population in the countries where the research was conducted. We identified 281 articles with 17,639 research participants. Approximately one‐third of the research participants were women in both 2000–2001 and 2020–2021. The representation from racial minorities of Black and Asian people increased from 2000–2001 to 2020–2021, but Asian and Native American people are still under‐represented in clinical drug trials today. The proportion of female authors increased, but female authors still made up less than 40% of the total number of authors in 2020–2021. In conclusion, men are still over‐represented in clinical pharmacology research, and some races are still vastly under‐represented. Furthermore, although the proportion of female authors increased with time, they are still under‐represented as first and last authors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10264921
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102649212023-06-15 Sex, racial, and ethnic diversity in clinical trials Bøttern, Julie Stage, Tore Bjerregaard Dunvald, Ann‐Cathrine Dalgård Clin Transl Sci Reviews Diverse representation in clinical trials is crucial to understand the efficacy and safety of drugs in minority groups. This review aims to (1) describe research participants' sex, racial, and ethnic diversity in clinical drug trials and (2) describe the sex distribution of researchers conducting the research. We reviewed all clinical drug trials published in the journals “Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics” and “Clinical and Translational Science” in 2000–2001 and 2020–2021 and analyzed the research participants' and researchers' demographics. We compared the race of the research participants with the concurrent race diversity of the reference population in the countries where the research was conducted. We identified 281 articles with 17,639 research participants. Approximately one‐third of the research participants were women in both 2000–2001 and 2020–2021. The representation from racial minorities of Black and Asian people increased from 2000–2001 to 2020–2021, but Asian and Native American people are still under‐represented in clinical drug trials today. The proportion of female authors increased, but female authors still made up less than 40% of the total number of authors in 2020–2021. In conclusion, men are still over‐represented in clinical pharmacology research, and some races are still vastly under‐represented. Furthermore, although the proportion of female authors increased with time, they are still under‐represented as first and last authors. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10264921/ /pubmed/36908052 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cts.13513 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Clinical and Translational Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Reviews
Bøttern, Julie
Stage, Tore Bjerregaard
Dunvald, Ann‐Cathrine Dalgård
Sex, racial, and ethnic diversity in clinical trials
title Sex, racial, and ethnic diversity in clinical trials
title_full Sex, racial, and ethnic diversity in clinical trials
title_fullStr Sex, racial, and ethnic diversity in clinical trials
title_full_unstemmed Sex, racial, and ethnic diversity in clinical trials
title_short Sex, racial, and ethnic diversity in clinical trials
title_sort sex, racial, and ethnic diversity in clinical trials
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10264921/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36908052
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cts.13513
work_keys_str_mv AT bøtternjulie sexracialandethnicdiversityinclinicaltrials
AT stagetorebjerregaard sexracialandethnicdiversityinclinicaltrials
AT dunvaldanncathrinedalgard sexracialandethnicdiversityinclinicaltrials