Cargando…
Prenatal phenotype of Wolf–Hirschhorn syndrome: A case series and literature review
OBJECTIVE: Wolf–Hirschhorn syndrome (WHS) is a congenital malformation syndrome with poor prognosis. It is associated with a heterozygous deletion of chromosome 4p16.3. Adequate knowledge of prenatal phenotypes and proper prenatal counseling are essential for intrauterine diagnosis. METHOD: We retro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10265096/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36849216 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.2155 |
_version_ | 1785058459719303168 |
---|---|
author | Tang, Feng Zeng, Yang Wang, Li Yin, Daishu Chen, Lin Xie, Dan Wang, Jing |
author_facet | Tang, Feng Zeng, Yang Wang, Li Yin, Daishu Chen, Lin Xie, Dan Wang, Jing |
author_sort | Tang, Feng |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Wolf–Hirschhorn syndrome (WHS) is a congenital malformation syndrome with poor prognosis. It is associated with a heterozygous deletion of chromosome 4p16.3. Adequate knowledge of prenatal phenotypes and proper prenatal counseling are essential for intrauterine diagnosis. METHOD: We retrospectively analyzed 11 prenatal cases of WHS diagnosed using low‐depth whole‐genome sequencing (copy number variation sequencing) performed at our hospital from May 2017 to September 2022 and reviewed their prenatal ultrasound reports in detail. We also analyzed WHS cases (including prenatal and postnatal) with abnormal prenatal ultrasound findings in the published literature over the past 20 years. RESULTS: Among the 11 fetuses with a prenatal diagnosis of WHS in our hospital, four cases showed abnormal prenatal ultrasound findings, including shrunken kidneys, ventricular septal defect, a small stomach, fetal growth restriction (FGR), enlarged posterior fossa, and soft ultrasonic markers. Our four cases were combined with 114 published WHS cases with prenatal ultrasound abnormalities from other medical institutions. Of the 118 cases, 59.3% (70 of 118) were multiple malformations. The most frequent ultrasound features observed in all 118 cases were FGR (76.3%, 90 of 118), followed by facial anomalies (28.8%, 34 of 118), central nervous system anomalies (27.1%, 32 of 118), and soft ultrasound markers (23.7%, 28 of 118). Other less common phenotypes included cardiac anomalies (19.5%, 23 of 118), genitourinary anomalies (19.5%, 23 of 118), increased NT/NF (12.7%, 15 of 118), skeletal anomalies (11.9%, 14 of 118), a single umbilical artery (10.2%, 12 of 118), gastrointestinal anomalies (9.3%, 11 of 118), oligohydramnios (8.5%, 10 of 118), cystic hygroma (5.1%, six of 118), hydrops/pleural effusion/ascites (2.5%, three of 118), and polyhydramnios (2.5%, three of 118). CONCLUSION: This study improved our understanding of the prenatal presentation of WHS by analyzing prenatal ultrasound abnormalities. The timely identification of prenatal ultrasound abnormalities can provide accurate consultation for pregnant women, improve the prenatal detection of WHS, and enable early prenatal management and intervention of WHS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10265096 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102650962023-06-15 Prenatal phenotype of Wolf–Hirschhorn syndrome: A case series and literature review Tang, Feng Zeng, Yang Wang, Li Yin, Daishu Chen, Lin Xie, Dan Wang, Jing Mol Genet Genomic Med Original Articles OBJECTIVE: Wolf–Hirschhorn syndrome (WHS) is a congenital malformation syndrome with poor prognosis. It is associated with a heterozygous deletion of chromosome 4p16.3. Adequate knowledge of prenatal phenotypes and proper prenatal counseling are essential for intrauterine diagnosis. METHOD: We retrospectively analyzed 11 prenatal cases of WHS diagnosed using low‐depth whole‐genome sequencing (copy number variation sequencing) performed at our hospital from May 2017 to September 2022 and reviewed their prenatal ultrasound reports in detail. We also analyzed WHS cases (including prenatal and postnatal) with abnormal prenatal ultrasound findings in the published literature over the past 20 years. RESULTS: Among the 11 fetuses with a prenatal diagnosis of WHS in our hospital, four cases showed abnormal prenatal ultrasound findings, including shrunken kidneys, ventricular septal defect, a small stomach, fetal growth restriction (FGR), enlarged posterior fossa, and soft ultrasonic markers. Our four cases were combined with 114 published WHS cases with prenatal ultrasound abnormalities from other medical institutions. Of the 118 cases, 59.3% (70 of 118) were multiple malformations. The most frequent ultrasound features observed in all 118 cases were FGR (76.3%, 90 of 118), followed by facial anomalies (28.8%, 34 of 118), central nervous system anomalies (27.1%, 32 of 118), and soft ultrasound markers (23.7%, 28 of 118). Other less common phenotypes included cardiac anomalies (19.5%, 23 of 118), genitourinary anomalies (19.5%, 23 of 118), increased NT/NF (12.7%, 15 of 118), skeletal anomalies (11.9%, 14 of 118), a single umbilical artery (10.2%, 12 of 118), gastrointestinal anomalies (9.3%, 11 of 118), oligohydramnios (8.5%, 10 of 118), cystic hygroma (5.1%, six of 118), hydrops/pleural effusion/ascites (2.5%, three of 118), and polyhydramnios (2.5%, three of 118). CONCLUSION: This study improved our understanding of the prenatal presentation of WHS by analyzing prenatal ultrasound abnormalities. The timely identification of prenatal ultrasound abnormalities can provide accurate consultation for pregnant women, improve the prenatal detection of WHS, and enable early prenatal management and intervention of WHS. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10265096/ /pubmed/36849216 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.2155 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Tang, Feng Zeng, Yang Wang, Li Yin, Daishu Chen, Lin Xie, Dan Wang, Jing Prenatal phenotype of Wolf–Hirschhorn syndrome: A case series and literature review |
title | Prenatal phenotype of Wolf–Hirschhorn syndrome: A case series and literature review |
title_full | Prenatal phenotype of Wolf–Hirschhorn syndrome: A case series and literature review |
title_fullStr | Prenatal phenotype of Wolf–Hirschhorn syndrome: A case series and literature review |
title_full_unstemmed | Prenatal phenotype of Wolf–Hirschhorn syndrome: A case series and literature review |
title_short | Prenatal phenotype of Wolf–Hirschhorn syndrome: A case series and literature review |
title_sort | prenatal phenotype of wolf–hirschhorn syndrome: a case series and literature review |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10265096/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36849216 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.2155 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tangfeng prenatalphenotypeofwolfhirschhornsyndromeacaseseriesandliteraturereview AT zengyang prenatalphenotypeofwolfhirschhornsyndromeacaseseriesandliteraturereview AT wangli prenatalphenotypeofwolfhirschhornsyndromeacaseseriesandliteraturereview AT yindaishu prenatalphenotypeofwolfhirschhornsyndromeacaseseriesandliteraturereview AT chenlin prenatalphenotypeofwolfhirschhornsyndromeacaseseriesandliteraturereview AT xiedan prenatalphenotypeofwolfhirschhornsyndromeacaseseriesandliteraturereview AT wangjing prenatalphenotypeofwolfhirschhornsyndromeacaseseriesandliteraturereview |