Cargando…
The best way of preventing device–device interactions may be avoiding implanting 2 devices in the first place
Extensive testing during the second device implantation was required to best program the devices in order to decrease these negative interactions. Unfortunately, these programming changes were not always successful at preventing device–device interactions during clinical follow-up.
Autor principal: | Verdino, Ralph J. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10265181/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37324973 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrcr.2023.02.018 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Cardiac implantable device recalls: consequences, and management
por: El-Chami, Mikhael F.
Publicado: (2021) -
Atrial Septal Occluder Device Embolization is Avoidable
por: Devarakonda, Bhargava V., et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Apps for immunization: Leveraging mobile devices to place the individual at the center of care
por: Wilson, Kumanan, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices and Consumer Electronic Devices: The Proof Is in the Front Pocket
por: Ellis, Christopher R., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Pars plana implantation of glaucoma drainage devices - The way to succeed in refractory glaucoma
por: Kumar, Harsh, et al.
Publicado: (2021)