Cargando…
Expansion of Telehealth Availability for Mental Health Care After State-Level Policy Changes From 2019 to 2022
IMPORTANCE: Although telehealth services expanded rapidly during the COVID-19 pandemic, the association between state policies and telehealth availability has been insufficiently characterized. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the associations between 4 state policies and telehealth availability at outpati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Medical Association
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10265313/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37310741 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.18045 |
_version_ | 1785058506658807808 |
---|---|
author | McBain, Ryan K. Schuler, Megan S. Qureshi, Nabeel Matthews, Samantha Kofner, Aaron Breslau, Joshua Cantor, Jonathan H. |
author_facet | McBain, Ryan K. Schuler, Megan S. Qureshi, Nabeel Matthews, Samantha Kofner, Aaron Breslau, Joshua Cantor, Jonathan H. |
author_sort | McBain, Ryan K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | IMPORTANCE: Although telehealth services expanded rapidly during the COVID-19 pandemic, the association between state policies and telehealth availability has been insufficiently characterized. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the associations between 4 state policies and telehealth availability at outpatient mental health treatment facilities throughout the US. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study measured whether mental health treatment facilities offered telehealth services each quarter from April 2019 through September 2022. The sample comprised facilities with outpatient services that were not part of the US Department of Veterans Affairs system. Four state policies were identified from 4 different sources. Data were analyzed in January 2023. EXPOSURES: For each quarter, implementation of the following policies was indexed by state: (1) payment parity for telehealth services among private insurers; (2) authorization of audio-only telehealth services for Medicaid and Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) beneficiaries; (3) participation in the Interstate Medical Licensure Compact (IMLC), permitting psychiatrists to provide telehealth services across state lines; and (4) participation in the Psychology Interjurisdictional Compact (PSYPACT), permitting clinical psychologists to provide telehealth services across state lines. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was the probability of a mental health treatment facility offering telehealth services in each quarter for each study year (2019-2022). Information on the facilities was obtained from the Mental Health and Addiction Treatment Tracking Repository based on the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Behavioral Health Treatment Service Locator. Separate multivariable fixed-effects regression models were used to estimate the difference in the probability of offering telehealth services after vs before policy implementation, adjusting for characteristics of the facility and county in which the facility was located. RESULTS: A total of 12 828 mental health treatment facilities were included. Overall, 88.1% of facilities offered telehealth services in September 2022 compared with 39.4% of facilities in April 2019. All 4 policies were associated with increased odds of telehealth availability: payment parity for telehealth services (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.11; 95% CI, 1.03-1.19), reimbursement for audio-only telehealth services (AOR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.64-1.81), IMLC participation (AOR, 1.40, 95% CI, 1.24-1.59), and PSYPACT participation (AOR, 1.21, 95% CI, 1.12-1.31). Facilities that accepted Medicaid as a form of payment had lower odds of offering telehealth services (AOR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.65-0.86) over the study period, as did facilities in counties with a higher proportion (>20%) of Black residents (AOR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.50-0.68). Facilities in rural counties had higher odds of offering telehealth services (AOR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.48-1.88). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Results of this study suggest that 4 state policies that were introduced during the COVID-19 pandemic were associated with marked expansion of telehealth availability for mental health care at mental health treatment facilities throughout the US. Despite these policies, telehealth services were less likely to be offered in counties with a greater proportion of Black residents and in facilities that accepted Medicaid and CHIP. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10265313 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | American Medical Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102653132023-06-15 Expansion of Telehealth Availability for Mental Health Care After State-Level Policy Changes From 2019 to 2022 McBain, Ryan K. Schuler, Megan S. Qureshi, Nabeel Matthews, Samantha Kofner, Aaron Breslau, Joshua Cantor, Jonathan H. JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Although telehealth services expanded rapidly during the COVID-19 pandemic, the association between state policies and telehealth availability has been insufficiently characterized. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the associations between 4 state policies and telehealth availability at outpatient mental health treatment facilities throughout the US. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study measured whether mental health treatment facilities offered telehealth services each quarter from April 2019 through September 2022. The sample comprised facilities with outpatient services that were not part of the US Department of Veterans Affairs system. Four state policies were identified from 4 different sources. Data were analyzed in January 2023. EXPOSURES: For each quarter, implementation of the following policies was indexed by state: (1) payment parity for telehealth services among private insurers; (2) authorization of audio-only telehealth services for Medicaid and Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) beneficiaries; (3) participation in the Interstate Medical Licensure Compact (IMLC), permitting psychiatrists to provide telehealth services across state lines; and (4) participation in the Psychology Interjurisdictional Compact (PSYPACT), permitting clinical psychologists to provide telehealth services across state lines. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was the probability of a mental health treatment facility offering telehealth services in each quarter for each study year (2019-2022). Information on the facilities was obtained from the Mental Health and Addiction Treatment Tracking Repository based on the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Behavioral Health Treatment Service Locator. Separate multivariable fixed-effects regression models were used to estimate the difference in the probability of offering telehealth services after vs before policy implementation, adjusting for characteristics of the facility and county in which the facility was located. RESULTS: A total of 12 828 mental health treatment facilities were included. Overall, 88.1% of facilities offered telehealth services in September 2022 compared with 39.4% of facilities in April 2019. All 4 policies were associated with increased odds of telehealth availability: payment parity for telehealth services (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.11; 95% CI, 1.03-1.19), reimbursement for audio-only telehealth services (AOR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.64-1.81), IMLC participation (AOR, 1.40, 95% CI, 1.24-1.59), and PSYPACT participation (AOR, 1.21, 95% CI, 1.12-1.31). Facilities that accepted Medicaid as a form of payment had lower odds of offering telehealth services (AOR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.65-0.86) over the study period, as did facilities in counties with a higher proportion (>20%) of Black residents (AOR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.50-0.68). Facilities in rural counties had higher odds of offering telehealth services (AOR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.48-1.88). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Results of this study suggest that 4 state policies that were introduced during the COVID-19 pandemic were associated with marked expansion of telehealth availability for mental health care at mental health treatment facilities throughout the US. Despite these policies, telehealth services were less likely to be offered in counties with a greater proportion of Black residents and in facilities that accepted Medicaid and CHIP. American Medical Association 2023-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10265313/ /pubmed/37310741 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.18045 Text en Copyright 2023 McBain RK et al. JAMA Network Open. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. |
spellingShingle | Original Investigation McBain, Ryan K. Schuler, Megan S. Qureshi, Nabeel Matthews, Samantha Kofner, Aaron Breslau, Joshua Cantor, Jonathan H. Expansion of Telehealth Availability for Mental Health Care After State-Level Policy Changes From 2019 to 2022 |
title | Expansion of Telehealth Availability for Mental Health Care After State-Level Policy Changes From 2019 to 2022 |
title_full | Expansion of Telehealth Availability for Mental Health Care After State-Level Policy Changes From 2019 to 2022 |
title_fullStr | Expansion of Telehealth Availability for Mental Health Care After State-Level Policy Changes From 2019 to 2022 |
title_full_unstemmed | Expansion of Telehealth Availability for Mental Health Care After State-Level Policy Changes From 2019 to 2022 |
title_short | Expansion of Telehealth Availability for Mental Health Care After State-Level Policy Changes From 2019 to 2022 |
title_sort | expansion of telehealth availability for mental health care after state-level policy changes from 2019 to 2022 |
topic | Original Investigation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10265313/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37310741 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.18045 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcbainryank expansionoftelehealthavailabilityformentalhealthcareafterstatelevelpolicychangesfrom2019to2022 AT schulermegans expansionoftelehealthavailabilityformentalhealthcareafterstatelevelpolicychangesfrom2019to2022 AT qureshinabeel expansionoftelehealthavailabilityformentalhealthcareafterstatelevelpolicychangesfrom2019to2022 AT matthewssamantha expansionoftelehealthavailabilityformentalhealthcareafterstatelevelpolicychangesfrom2019to2022 AT kofneraaron expansionoftelehealthavailabilityformentalhealthcareafterstatelevelpolicychangesfrom2019to2022 AT breslaujoshua expansionoftelehealthavailabilityformentalhealthcareafterstatelevelpolicychangesfrom2019to2022 AT cantorjonathanh expansionoftelehealthavailabilityformentalhealthcareafterstatelevelpolicychangesfrom2019to2022 |