Cargando…

The role of ROX index–based intubation in COVID-19 pneumonia: a cross-sectional comparison and retrospective survival analysis

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients with acute respiratory failure who experience delayed initiation of invasive mechanical ventilation have poor outcomes. The lack of objective measures to define the timing of intubation is an area of concern. We investigated the effect of timi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vergis, Sara, Philip, Sam, Paul, Vergis, George, Manjit, Philip, Nevil C, Tomy, Mithu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10265418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37313664
http://dx.doi.org/10.4266/acc.2022.00206
_version_ 1785058526844944384
author Vergis, Sara
Philip, Sam
Paul, Vergis
George, Manjit
Philip, Nevil C
Tomy, Mithu
author_facet Vergis, Sara
Philip, Sam
Paul, Vergis
George, Manjit
Philip, Nevil C
Tomy, Mithu
author_sort Vergis, Sara
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients with acute respiratory failure who experience delayed initiation of invasive mechanical ventilation have poor outcomes. The lack of objective measures to define the timing of intubation is an area of concern. We investigated the effect of timing of intubation based on respiratory rate-oxygenation (ROX) index on the outcomes of COVID-19 pneumonia. METHODS: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study performed in a tertiary care teaching hospital in Kerala, India. Patients with COVID-19 pneumonia who were intubated were grouped into early intubation (within 12 hours of ROX index <4.88) or delayed intubation (12 hours or more hours after ROX <4.88). RESULTS: A total of 58 patients was included in the study after exclusions. Among them, 20 patients were intubated early, and 38 patients were intubated 12 hours after ROX index <4.88. The mean age of the study population was 57±14 years, and 55.0% of the patients were male; diabetes mellitus (48.3%) and hypertension (50.0%) were the most common comorbidities. The early intubation group had 88.2% successful extubation, while only 11.8% of the delayed group had successful extubation (P<0.001). Survival was also significantly more frequent in the early intubation group. CONCLUSIONS: Early intubation within 12 hours of ROX index <4.88 was associated with improved extubation and survival in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10265418
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102654182023-06-15 The role of ROX index–based intubation in COVID-19 pneumonia: a cross-sectional comparison and retrospective survival analysis Vergis, Sara Philip, Sam Paul, Vergis George, Manjit Philip, Nevil C Tomy, Mithu Acute Crit Care Original Article BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients with acute respiratory failure who experience delayed initiation of invasive mechanical ventilation have poor outcomes. The lack of objective measures to define the timing of intubation is an area of concern. We investigated the effect of timing of intubation based on respiratory rate-oxygenation (ROX) index on the outcomes of COVID-19 pneumonia. METHODS: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study performed in a tertiary care teaching hospital in Kerala, India. Patients with COVID-19 pneumonia who were intubated were grouped into early intubation (within 12 hours of ROX index <4.88) or delayed intubation (12 hours or more hours after ROX <4.88). RESULTS: A total of 58 patients was included in the study after exclusions. Among them, 20 patients were intubated early, and 38 patients were intubated 12 hours after ROX index <4.88. The mean age of the study population was 57±14 years, and 55.0% of the patients were male; diabetes mellitus (48.3%) and hypertension (50.0%) were the most common comorbidities. The early intubation group had 88.2% successful extubation, while only 11.8% of the delayed group had successful extubation (P<0.001). Survival was also significantly more frequent in the early intubation group. CONCLUSIONS: Early intubation within 12 hours of ROX index <4.88 was associated with improved extubation and survival in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine 2023-05 2023-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10265418/ /pubmed/37313664 http://dx.doi.org/10.4266/acc.2022.00206 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Vergis, Sara
Philip, Sam
Paul, Vergis
George, Manjit
Philip, Nevil C
Tomy, Mithu
The role of ROX index–based intubation in COVID-19 pneumonia: a cross-sectional comparison and retrospective survival analysis
title The role of ROX index–based intubation in COVID-19 pneumonia: a cross-sectional comparison and retrospective survival analysis
title_full The role of ROX index–based intubation in COVID-19 pneumonia: a cross-sectional comparison and retrospective survival analysis
title_fullStr The role of ROX index–based intubation in COVID-19 pneumonia: a cross-sectional comparison and retrospective survival analysis
title_full_unstemmed The role of ROX index–based intubation in COVID-19 pneumonia: a cross-sectional comparison and retrospective survival analysis
title_short The role of ROX index–based intubation in COVID-19 pneumonia: a cross-sectional comparison and retrospective survival analysis
title_sort role of rox index–based intubation in covid-19 pneumonia: a cross-sectional comparison and retrospective survival analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10265418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37313664
http://dx.doi.org/10.4266/acc.2022.00206
work_keys_str_mv AT vergissara theroleofroxindexbasedintubationincovid19pneumoniaacrosssectionalcomparisonandretrospectivesurvivalanalysis
AT philipsam theroleofroxindexbasedintubationincovid19pneumoniaacrosssectionalcomparisonandretrospectivesurvivalanalysis
AT paulvergis theroleofroxindexbasedintubationincovid19pneumoniaacrosssectionalcomparisonandretrospectivesurvivalanalysis
AT georgemanjit theroleofroxindexbasedintubationincovid19pneumoniaacrosssectionalcomparisonandretrospectivesurvivalanalysis
AT philipnevilc theroleofroxindexbasedintubationincovid19pneumoniaacrosssectionalcomparisonandretrospectivesurvivalanalysis
AT tomymithu theroleofroxindexbasedintubationincovid19pneumoniaacrosssectionalcomparisonandretrospectivesurvivalanalysis
AT vergissara roleofroxindexbasedintubationincovid19pneumoniaacrosssectionalcomparisonandretrospectivesurvivalanalysis
AT philipsam roleofroxindexbasedintubationincovid19pneumoniaacrosssectionalcomparisonandretrospectivesurvivalanalysis
AT paulvergis roleofroxindexbasedintubationincovid19pneumoniaacrosssectionalcomparisonandretrospectivesurvivalanalysis
AT georgemanjit roleofroxindexbasedintubationincovid19pneumoniaacrosssectionalcomparisonandretrospectivesurvivalanalysis
AT philipnevilc roleofroxindexbasedintubationincovid19pneumoniaacrosssectionalcomparisonandretrospectivesurvivalanalysis
AT tomymithu roleofroxindexbasedintubationincovid19pneumoniaacrosssectionalcomparisonandretrospectivesurvivalanalysis