Cargando…

Non-rigorous versus rigorous home confinement differently impacts mental health, quality of life and behaviors. Which one was better? A cross-sectional study with older Brazilian adults during covid-19 first wave

BACKGROUND: The implementation of social distancing measures during covid-19 influenced health outcomes and population´s behaviors, and its rigidity was very different across countries. We aimed to verify the association between the rigidity of social distancing measures of covid-19 first wave with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bohn, Lucimere, Abdalla, Pedro Pugliesi, Gomide, Euripedes Barsanulfo Gonçalves, da Silva, Leonardo Santos Lopes, dos Santos, André Pereira
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10265552/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37316863
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13690-023-01106-2
_version_ 1785058556287909888
author Bohn, Lucimere
Abdalla, Pedro Pugliesi
Gomide, Euripedes Barsanulfo Gonçalves
da Silva, Leonardo Santos Lopes
dos Santos, André Pereira
author_facet Bohn, Lucimere
Abdalla, Pedro Pugliesi
Gomide, Euripedes Barsanulfo Gonçalves
da Silva, Leonardo Santos Lopes
dos Santos, André Pereira
author_sort Bohn, Lucimere
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The implementation of social distancing measures during covid-19 influenced health outcomes and population´s behaviors, and its rigidity was very different across countries. We aimed to verify the association between the rigidity of social distancing measures of covid-19 first wave with depression symptoms, quality of life and sleep quality in older adults. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study including 1023 older adults (90% women; 67.68 ± 5.92 years old) of a community-based program in Fortaleza (Brazil). Dependent variables (depression symptoms, sleep quality, and quality of life) were measured through phone calls along June 2020, during the first covid-19 wave. Confinement rigidity (non-rigorous and rigorous) was considered as independent variable. Sociodemographic characteristics (sex, marital status, scholarity, and ethnicity), number of health conditions, nutritional status, movement behavior (physical activity and sitting time), technological skills, and pet ownership were considered as confounding variables. A binomial logistic regression (odds ratio [OR]) was performed to verify the association of confinement rigidity and depression symptoms, sleep quality, and quality of life, adjusted by confounding variables. RESULTS: Older adults who adopted a less rigid lockdown had a higher frequency of depression symptoms, worse perception of quality of life, and bad sleep quality (p < 0.001). Confinement rigidity was able to explain the probability of depression symptoms occurrence (OR: 2.067 [95% CI: 1.531–2.791]; p < 0.001), worse quality of life (OR: 1.488 [95% CI: 1.139–1.944]; p < 0.05), and bad sleep quality (OR: 1.839 [95% CI: 1.412–2.395]; p < 0.001). Even adjusted by confounding variables, confinement rigidity was able to explain the poor outcomes analyzed in older adults. CONCLUSION: Our findings showed that less rigid lockdown was associated with a superior frequency of depression symptoms, worse sleep quality, and lower perception of quality of life in older adults. Therefore, our study could improve comprehension regarding the impact of social distancing measures rigidity in health-related conditions and in the context of covid-19 and other similar pandemic situations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13690-023-01106-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10265552
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102655522023-06-14 Non-rigorous versus rigorous home confinement differently impacts mental health, quality of life and behaviors. Which one was better? A cross-sectional study with older Brazilian adults during covid-19 first wave Bohn, Lucimere Abdalla, Pedro Pugliesi Gomide, Euripedes Barsanulfo Gonçalves da Silva, Leonardo Santos Lopes dos Santos, André Pereira Arch Public Health Research BACKGROUND: The implementation of social distancing measures during covid-19 influenced health outcomes and population´s behaviors, and its rigidity was very different across countries. We aimed to verify the association between the rigidity of social distancing measures of covid-19 first wave with depression symptoms, quality of life and sleep quality in older adults. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study including 1023 older adults (90% women; 67.68 ± 5.92 years old) of a community-based program in Fortaleza (Brazil). Dependent variables (depression symptoms, sleep quality, and quality of life) were measured through phone calls along June 2020, during the first covid-19 wave. Confinement rigidity (non-rigorous and rigorous) was considered as independent variable. Sociodemographic characteristics (sex, marital status, scholarity, and ethnicity), number of health conditions, nutritional status, movement behavior (physical activity and sitting time), technological skills, and pet ownership were considered as confounding variables. A binomial logistic regression (odds ratio [OR]) was performed to verify the association of confinement rigidity and depression symptoms, sleep quality, and quality of life, adjusted by confounding variables. RESULTS: Older adults who adopted a less rigid lockdown had a higher frequency of depression symptoms, worse perception of quality of life, and bad sleep quality (p < 0.001). Confinement rigidity was able to explain the probability of depression symptoms occurrence (OR: 2.067 [95% CI: 1.531–2.791]; p < 0.001), worse quality of life (OR: 1.488 [95% CI: 1.139–1.944]; p < 0.05), and bad sleep quality (OR: 1.839 [95% CI: 1.412–2.395]; p < 0.001). Even adjusted by confounding variables, confinement rigidity was able to explain the poor outcomes analyzed in older adults. CONCLUSION: Our findings showed that less rigid lockdown was associated with a superior frequency of depression symptoms, worse sleep quality, and lower perception of quality of life in older adults. Therefore, our study could improve comprehension regarding the impact of social distancing measures rigidity in health-related conditions and in the context of covid-19 and other similar pandemic situations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13690-023-01106-2. BioMed Central 2023-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10265552/ /pubmed/37316863 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13690-023-01106-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Bohn, Lucimere
Abdalla, Pedro Pugliesi
Gomide, Euripedes Barsanulfo Gonçalves
da Silva, Leonardo Santos Lopes
dos Santos, André Pereira
Non-rigorous versus rigorous home confinement differently impacts mental health, quality of life and behaviors. Which one was better? A cross-sectional study with older Brazilian adults during covid-19 first wave
title Non-rigorous versus rigorous home confinement differently impacts mental health, quality of life and behaviors. Which one was better? A cross-sectional study with older Brazilian adults during covid-19 first wave
title_full Non-rigorous versus rigorous home confinement differently impacts mental health, quality of life and behaviors. Which one was better? A cross-sectional study with older Brazilian adults during covid-19 first wave
title_fullStr Non-rigorous versus rigorous home confinement differently impacts mental health, quality of life and behaviors. Which one was better? A cross-sectional study with older Brazilian adults during covid-19 first wave
title_full_unstemmed Non-rigorous versus rigorous home confinement differently impacts mental health, quality of life and behaviors. Which one was better? A cross-sectional study with older Brazilian adults during covid-19 first wave
title_short Non-rigorous versus rigorous home confinement differently impacts mental health, quality of life and behaviors. Which one was better? A cross-sectional study with older Brazilian adults during covid-19 first wave
title_sort non-rigorous versus rigorous home confinement differently impacts mental health, quality of life and behaviors. which one was better? a cross-sectional study with older brazilian adults during covid-19 first wave
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10265552/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37316863
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13690-023-01106-2
work_keys_str_mv AT bohnlucimere nonrigorousversusrigoroushomeconfinementdifferentlyimpactsmentalhealthqualityoflifeandbehaviorswhichonewasbetteracrosssectionalstudywitholderbrazilianadultsduringcovid19firstwave
AT abdallapedropugliesi nonrigorousversusrigoroushomeconfinementdifferentlyimpactsmentalhealthqualityoflifeandbehaviorswhichonewasbetteracrosssectionalstudywitholderbrazilianadultsduringcovid19firstwave
AT gomideeuripedesbarsanulfogoncalves nonrigorousversusrigoroushomeconfinementdifferentlyimpactsmentalhealthqualityoflifeandbehaviorswhichonewasbetteracrosssectionalstudywitholderbrazilianadultsduringcovid19firstwave
AT dasilvaleonardosantoslopes nonrigorousversusrigoroushomeconfinementdifferentlyimpactsmentalhealthqualityoflifeandbehaviorswhichonewasbetteracrosssectionalstudywitholderbrazilianadultsduringcovid19firstwave
AT dossantosandrepereira nonrigorousversusrigoroushomeconfinementdifferentlyimpactsmentalhealthqualityoflifeandbehaviorswhichonewasbetteracrosssectionalstudywitholderbrazilianadultsduringcovid19firstwave