Cargando…

Evaluation of primary wound healing and potential complications after perioperative infiltration with lidocaine without adrenaline in surgical incisions in dogs and cats

BACKGROUND: Pre-emptive local analgesia with the use of lidocaine is practised increasingly in veterinary medicine as part of applied multimodal analgesia, despite its controversial impact on wound healing. The purpose of this prospective, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Herlofson, Erica Anna Gumpert, Tavola, Francesca, Engdahl, Karolina Siri, Bergström, Annika Filippa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10265759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37312211
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13028-023-00686-x
_version_ 1785058599655964672
author Herlofson, Erica Anna Gumpert
Tavola, Francesca
Engdahl, Karolina Siri
Bergström, Annika Filippa
author_facet Herlofson, Erica Anna Gumpert
Tavola, Francesca
Engdahl, Karolina Siri
Bergström, Annika Filippa
author_sort Herlofson, Erica Anna Gumpert
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pre-emptive local analgesia with the use of lidocaine is practised increasingly in veterinary medicine as part of applied multimodal analgesia, despite its controversial impact on wound healing. The purpose of this prospective, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical study was to evaluate if preoperative subcutaneous infiltration of lidocaine has a negative impact on primary wound healing of surgical incisions. Fifty-two companion animals (3 cats and 49 dogs) were enrolled in the study. The inclusion criteria were as follows: American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) score I or II, a minimum body weight of 5 kg, and a planned incisional length of at least 4 cm. Surgical incisions were infiltrated subcutaneously with lidocaine without adrenaline or NaCl (placebo). Follow-up questionnaires for owners and veterinarians and thermography of the surgical wound were used to assess wound healing. Antimicrobial use was documented. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in either the total score or the individual assessment points between the treatment and the placebo group on the owner or the veterinary questionnaires in regard to primary wound healing (P > 0.05 for all comparisons). No significant difference was found between the thermography results of the treatment and placebo group (P = 0.78), and there was no significant correlation between the total score from the veterinary protocol and thermography results (Spearman’s correlation coefficient − 0.10, P = 0.51). Surgical site infections developed in 5/53 (9.4%) surgeries and its occurrence varied significantly between the treatment and the placebo group as all cases of infection were in the placebo group (P = 0.05). CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that lidocaine used as a local anaesthetic did not affect wound healing in patients with ASA scores I-II. The results suggest that lidocaine infiltration in surgical incisions can be safely used to reduce pain. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13028-023-00686-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10265759
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102657592023-06-15 Evaluation of primary wound healing and potential complications after perioperative infiltration with lidocaine without adrenaline in surgical incisions in dogs and cats Herlofson, Erica Anna Gumpert Tavola, Francesca Engdahl, Karolina Siri Bergström, Annika Filippa Acta Vet Scand Research BACKGROUND: Pre-emptive local analgesia with the use of lidocaine is practised increasingly in veterinary medicine as part of applied multimodal analgesia, despite its controversial impact on wound healing. The purpose of this prospective, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical study was to evaluate if preoperative subcutaneous infiltration of lidocaine has a negative impact on primary wound healing of surgical incisions. Fifty-two companion animals (3 cats and 49 dogs) were enrolled in the study. The inclusion criteria were as follows: American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) score I or II, a minimum body weight of 5 kg, and a planned incisional length of at least 4 cm. Surgical incisions were infiltrated subcutaneously with lidocaine without adrenaline or NaCl (placebo). Follow-up questionnaires for owners and veterinarians and thermography of the surgical wound were used to assess wound healing. Antimicrobial use was documented. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in either the total score or the individual assessment points between the treatment and the placebo group on the owner or the veterinary questionnaires in regard to primary wound healing (P > 0.05 for all comparisons). No significant difference was found between the thermography results of the treatment and placebo group (P = 0.78), and there was no significant correlation between the total score from the veterinary protocol and thermography results (Spearman’s correlation coefficient − 0.10, P = 0.51). Surgical site infections developed in 5/53 (9.4%) surgeries and its occurrence varied significantly between the treatment and the placebo group as all cases of infection were in the placebo group (P = 0.05). CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that lidocaine used as a local anaesthetic did not affect wound healing in patients with ASA scores I-II. The results suggest that lidocaine infiltration in surgical incisions can be safely used to reduce pain. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13028-023-00686-x. BioMed Central 2023-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10265759/ /pubmed/37312211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13028-023-00686-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Herlofson, Erica Anna Gumpert
Tavola, Francesca
Engdahl, Karolina Siri
Bergström, Annika Filippa
Evaluation of primary wound healing and potential complications after perioperative infiltration with lidocaine without adrenaline in surgical incisions in dogs and cats
title Evaluation of primary wound healing and potential complications after perioperative infiltration with lidocaine without adrenaline in surgical incisions in dogs and cats
title_full Evaluation of primary wound healing and potential complications after perioperative infiltration with lidocaine without adrenaline in surgical incisions in dogs and cats
title_fullStr Evaluation of primary wound healing and potential complications after perioperative infiltration with lidocaine without adrenaline in surgical incisions in dogs and cats
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of primary wound healing and potential complications after perioperative infiltration with lidocaine without adrenaline in surgical incisions in dogs and cats
title_short Evaluation of primary wound healing and potential complications after perioperative infiltration with lidocaine without adrenaline in surgical incisions in dogs and cats
title_sort evaluation of primary wound healing and potential complications after perioperative infiltration with lidocaine without adrenaline in surgical incisions in dogs and cats
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10265759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37312211
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13028-023-00686-x
work_keys_str_mv AT herlofsonericaannagumpert evaluationofprimarywoundhealingandpotentialcomplicationsafterperioperativeinfiltrationwithlidocainewithoutadrenalineinsurgicalincisionsindogsandcats
AT tavolafrancesca evaluationofprimarywoundhealingandpotentialcomplicationsafterperioperativeinfiltrationwithlidocainewithoutadrenalineinsurgicalincisionsindogsandcats
AT engdahlkarolinasiri evaluationofprimarywoundhealingandpotentialcomplicationsafterperioperativeinfiltrationwithlidocainewithoutadrenalineinsurgicalincisionsindogsandcats
AT bergstromannikafilippa evaluationofprimarywoundhealingandpotentialcomplicationsafterperioperativeinfiltrationwithlidocainewithoutadrenalineinsurgicalincisionsindogsandcats